Patrick Braun1, Monica Drago2, Diana Fanti2, Hervé Fleury3, Jörg Hofmann4, Jacques Izopet5, Sebastian Kühn4, Alessandra Lombardi6, Valeria Micheli6, Karine Sauné5, Pascale Trimoulet3, Duncan Whittaker7, Alain Artus8, Daniel Rhodes9. 1. Laboratory Dr. Knechten, Medical Center for HIV and Hepatits, Aachen, Germany. 2. Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology Laboratories, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy. 3. Virology Department, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU Bordeaux, France. 4. Virology Department, Labor Berlin - Charité Vivantes GmbH, Berlin, Germany. 5. Department of Virology, Federative Institute of Biology, CHU Toulouse, France. 6. Clinical Microbiology, Virology and Bioemergence Diagnosis, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy. 7. Laboratory Medicine Building, North Lane, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK. 8. Beckman Coulter, Immunotech, Marseille, France. 9. Beckman Coulter, Immunotech, Marseille, France. Electronic address: dwrhodes@beckman.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Beckman Coulter has developed the VERIS HCV Assay for use on the new fully automated DxN VERIS Molecular Diagnostic System¥ for HCV viral load monitoring. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the clinical performance of the new quantitative VERIS HCV Assay. STUDY DESIGN: Comparison was performed on 279 plasma specimens from HCV infected patients tested with the VERIS HCV Assay and COBAS® Ampliprep/COBAS® Taqman® HCV Test and 369 specimens tested with the VERIS HCV Assay and RealTime HCV Assay. Patient monitoring sample results from four time points were also compared. RESULTS: The average bias between the VERIS HCV Assay and the COBAS® Ampliprep/COBAS® Taqman® HCV Test was 0.04 log10IU/mL, while between the VERIS HCV Assay and the RealTime HCV Assay average bias was 0.21 log10IU/mL. Bias, however, was not consistent across the measuring range. Analysis at the lower end of quantification levels 50, 100, and 1000IU/mL showed a predicted bias for VERIS HCV Assay versus COBAS® Ampliprep/COBAS® Taqman® HCV Test between -0.42 and -0.22 log10IU/mL and for VERIS HCV Assay versus RealTime HCV Assay between 0.00 and 0.13 log10IU/mL. Patient monitoring of HCV viral load over time demonstrated similar levels between VERIS HCV Assay results and COBAS® Ampliprep/COBAS® Taqman® HCV Test (52 samples from 13 patients) and RealTime HCV Assay (112 samples from 28 patients). CONCLUSIONS: VERIS HCV Assay for use on the DxN VERIS Molecular Diagnostic System represents a reliable new tool for easy sample to result HCV RNA viral load monitoring.
BACKGROUND: Beckman Coulter has developed the VERIS HCV Assay for use on the new fully automated DxN VERIS Molecular Diagnostic System¥ for HCV viral load monitoring. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the clinical performance of the new quantitative VERIS HCV Assay. STUDY DESIGN: Comparison was performed on 279 plasma specimens from HCV infectedpatients tested with the VERIS HCV Assay and COBAS® Ampliprep/COBAS® Taqman® HCV Test and 369 specimens tested with the VERIS HCV Assay and RealTime HCV Assay. Patient monitoring sample results from four time points were also compared. RESULTS: The average bias between the VERIS HCV Assay and the COBAS® Ampliprep/COBAS® Taqman® HCV Test was 0.04 log10IU/mL, while between the VERIS HCV Assay and the RealTime HCV Assay average bias was 0.21 log10IU/mL. Bias, however, was not consistent across the measuring range. Analysis at the lower end of quantification levels 50, 100, and 1000IU/mL showed a predicted bias for VERIS HCV Assay versus COBAS® Ampliprep/COBAS® Taqman® HCV Test between -0.42 and -0.22 log10IU/mL and for VERIS HCV Assay versus RealTime HCV Assay between 0.00 and 0.13 log10IU/mL. Patient monitoring of HCV viral load over time demonstrated similar levels between VERIS HCV Assay results and COBAS® Ampliprep/COBAS® Taqman® HCV Test (52 samples from 13 patients) and RealTime HCV Assay (112 samples from 28 patients). CONCLUSIONS: VERIS HCV Assay for use on the DxN VERIS Molecular Diagnostic System represents a reliable new tool for easy sample to result HCV RNA viral load monitoring.