Literature DB >> 28319717

Land use regression modelling of air pollution in high density high rise cities: A case study in Hong Kong.

Martha Lee1, Michael Brauer2, Paulina Wong3, Robert Tang4, Tsz Him Tsui4, Crystal Choi4, Wei Cheng3, Poh-Chin Lai3, Linwei Tian4, Thuan-Quoc Thach4, Ryan Allen5, Benjamin Barratt6.   

Abstract

Land use regression (LUR) is a common method of predicting spatial variability of air pollution to estimate exposure. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), nitric oxide (NO), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and black carbon (BC) concentrations were measured during two sampling campaigns (April-May and November-January) in Hong Kong (a prototypical high-density high-rise city). Along with 365 potential geospatial predictor variables, these concentrations were used to build two-dimensional land use regression (LUR) models for the territory. Summary statistics for combined measurements over both campaigns were: a) NO2 (Mean=106μg/m3, SD=38.5, N=95), b) NO (M=147μg/m3, SD=88.9, N=40), c) PM2.5 (M=35μg/m3, SD=6.3, N=64), and BC (M=10.6μg/m3, SD=5.3, N=76). Final LUR models had the following statistics: a) NO2 (R2=0.46, RMSE=28μg/m3) b) NO (R2=0.50, RMSE=62μg/m3), c) PM2.5 (R2=0.59; RMSE=4μg/m3), and d) BC (R2=0.50, RMSE=4μg/m3). Traditional LUR predictors such as road length, car park density, and land use types were included in most models. The NO2 prediction surface values were highest in Kowloon and the northern region of Hong Kong Island (downtown Hong Kong). NO showed a similar pattern in the built-up region. Both PM2.5 and BC predictions exhibited a northwest-southeast gradient, with higher concentrations in the north (close to mainland China). For BC, the port was also an area of elevated predicted concentrations. The results matched with existing literature on spatial variation in concentrations of air pollutants and in relation to important emission sources in Hong Kong. The success of these models suggests LUR is appropriate in high-density, high-rise cities.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air pollution; Exposure assessment; GIS; Land use regression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28319717     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  10 in total

1.  Land use regression for spatial distribution of urban particulate matter (PM10) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) in a heavily polluted city in Northeast China.

Authors:  Hehua Zhang; Yuhong Zhao
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Spatialization and Prediction of Seasonal NO2 Pollution Due to Climate Change in the Korean Capital Area through Land Use Regression Modeling.

Authors:  No Ol Lim; Jinhoo Hwang; Sung-Joo Lee; Youngjae Yoo; Yuyoung Choi; Seongwoo Jeon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Application of land use regression to assess exposure and identify potential sources in PM2.5, BC, NO2 concentrations.

Authors:  Jing Cai; Yihui Ge; Huichu Li; Changyuan Yang; Cong Liu; Xia Meng; Weidong Wang; Can Niu; Lena Kan; Tamara Schikowski; Beizhan Yan; Steven N Chillrud; Haidong Kan; Li Jin
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  The associations between social, built and geophysical environment and age-specific dementia mortality among older adults in a high-density Asian city.

Authors:  Hung Chak Ho; Kenneth N K Fong; Ta-Chien Chan; Yuan Shi
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.918

5.  Effects of Urban Green Space on Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomarkers in Chinese Adults: Panel Study Using Digital Tracking Devices.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Ka Long Chan; John W M Yuen; Frances K Y Wong; Lefei Han; Hung Chak Ho; Katherine K P Chang; Yuen Shan Ho; Judy Yuen-Man Siu; Linwei Tian; Man Sing Wong
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2021-12-30

6.  Analysis of changes in air pollution quality and impact of COVID-19 on environmental health in Iran: application of interpolation models and spatial autocorrelation.

Authors:  Mostafa Keshtkar; Hamed Heidari; Niloofar Moazzeni; Hossein Azadi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.190

7.  Air Quality Forecast by Statistical Methods: Application to Portugal and Macao.

Authors:  Luísa Mendes; Joana Monjardino; Francisco Ferreira
Journal:  Front Big Data       Date:  2022-03-10

8.  Impact of China's Rural Land Marketization on Ecological Environment Quality Based on Remote Sensing.

Authors:  Zihao Li; Xihang Xie; Xinyue Yan; Tingting Bai; Dong Xu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 4.614

9.  International Mind, Activities and Urban Places (iMAP) study: methods of a cohort study on environmental and lifestyle influences on brain and cognitive health.

Authors:  Ester Cerin; Anthony Barnett; Basile Chaix; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Karen Caeyenberghs; Bin Jalaludin; Takemi Sugiyama; James F Sallis; Nicola T Lautenschlager; Michael Y Ni; Govinda Poudel; David Donaire-Gonzalez; Rachel Tham; Amanda J Wheeler; Luke Knibbs; Linwei Tian; Yih-Kai Chan; David W Dunstan; Alison Carver; Kaarin J Anstey
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  High-resolution spatiotemporal measurement of air and environmental noise pollution in Sub-Saharan African cities: Pathways to Equitable Health Cities Study protocol for Accra, Ghana.

Authors:  Sierra N Clark; Abosede S Alli; Michael Brauer; Majid Ezzati; Jill Baumgartner; Mireille B Toledano; Allison F Hughes; James Nimo; Josephine Bedford Moses; Solomon Terkpertey; Jose Vallarino; Samuel Agyei-Mensah; Ernest Agyemang; Ricky Nathvani; Emily Muller; James Bennett; Jiayuan Wang; Andrew Beddows; Frank Kelly; Benjamin Barratt; Sean Beevers; Raphael E Arku
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.