Literature DB >> 28319587

Sedentary Behavior, Physical Activity, and Fitness-The Maastricht Study.

Jeroen H P M VAN DER Velde1, Annemarie Koster, Julianne D VAN DER Berg, Simone J S Sep, Carla J H VAN DER Kallen, Pieter C Dagnelie, Miranda T Schram, Ronald M A Henry, Simone J P M Eussen, Martien C J M VAN Dongen, Coen D A Stehouwer, Nicolaas C Schaper, Hans H C M Savelberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This cross-sectional study examined the mutual independent associations of sedentary behavior, lower intensity physical activity (LPA) and higher intensity physical activity (HPA) (an approximation of moderate to vigorous physical activity with cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF).
METHODS: Two thousand twenty-four participants were included from The Maastricht Study (mean ± SD age, 59.7 ± 8.1 yr; 49.6% men). With the activPAL3 activity monitor, we assessed sedentary time (ST), sedentary pattern variables (number of sedentary breaks, average sedentary bout duration, and number of prolonged sedentary bouts [≥30 min]), LPA, and HPA. CRF was calculated as maximum power output per kilogram body mass (Wmax·kg) estimated from a submaximal cycle ergometer test. Linear regression analyses and isotemporal substitution analyses were used to examine associations of ST, sedentary pattern variables, and HPA with CRF. Analyses were stratified by sex.
RESULTS: One hour of ST per day was associated with a lower Wmax·kg: Bmen = -0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.05 to -0.01) and Bwomen = -0.02 (95% CI, -0.04 to 0.00), independent of HPA. No statistically significant associations between sedentary patterns variables and CRF were observed. LPA was associated with a higher Wmax·kg: Bmen = 0.12 (95% CI, 0.07-0.17) and Bwomen = 0.12 (95% CI, 0.07-0.18). HPA was associated with a higher Wmax·kg: Bmen = 0.48 (95% CI, 0.38-0.58) and Bwomen = 0.27 (95% CI, 0.18-0.36). Replacing ST with LPA (Bmen, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.14; Bwomen, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.05-0.16) or with HPA (Bmen, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39-0.59; Bwomen = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19-0.36), but not with standing was associated with higher CRF.
CONCLUSIONS: Modest associations between sedentary behavior and CRF were observed. Replacing ST with LPA was associated with higher CRF, which could be of particular importance for individuals who cannot engage in HPA. Nonetheless, replacing ST with HPA was associated with greatest estimated change in CRF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28319587     DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  17 in total

1.  The Relationship of Accelerometer-Assessed Standing Time With and Without Ambulation and Mortality: The WHI OPACH Study.

Authors:  Purva Jain; John Bellettiere; Nicole Glass; Michael J LaMonte; Chongzhi Di; Robert A Wild; Kelly R Evenson; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Acute Effects of Sedentary Behavior on Ankle Torque Assessed with a Custom-Made Electronic Dynamometer.

Authors:  Iulia Iovanca Dragoi; Florina Georgeta Popescu; Teodor Petrita; Florin Alexa; Sorin Barac; Cosmina Ioana Bondor; Elena-Ana Pauncu; Frank L Bowling; Neil D Reeves; Mihai Ionac
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  Sitting, squatting, and the evolutionary biology of human inactivity.

Authors:  David A Raichlen; Herman Pontzer; Theodore W Zderic; Jacob A Harris; Audax Z P Mabulla; Marc T Hamilton; Brian M Wood
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Health outcomes associated with reallocations of time between sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity: a systematic scoping review of isotemporal substitution studies.

Authors:  Jozo Grgic; Dorothea Dumuid; Enrique Garcia Bengoechea; Nipun Shrestha; Adrian Bauman; Timothy Olds; Zeljko Pedisic
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Screen-based sedentary behavior during adolescence and pulmonary function in a birth cohort.

Authors:  Bruna Gonçalves C da Silva; Ana M B Menezes; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Fernando C Barros; Michael Pratt
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 6.457

6.  The Association Between β-Blocker Use and Cardiorespiratory Fitness: The Maastricht Study.

Authors:  Johannes T H Nielen; Frank de Vries; Jeroen H P M van der Velde; Hans H C M Savelberg; Nicolaas C Schaper; Pieter C Dagnelie; Ronald M A Henry; Miranda Schram; Coen D A Stehouwer; Annelies Boonen; Annemarie Koster; Bart J F van den Bemt
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.457

7.  Which is more important for cardiometabolic health: sedentary time, higher intensity physical activity or cardiorespiratory fitness? The Maastricht Study.

Authors:  Jeroen H P M van der Velde; Nicolaas C Schaper; Coen D A Stehouwer; Carla J H van der Kallen; Simone J S Sep; Miranda T Schram; Ronald M A Henry; Pieter C Dagnelie; Simone J P M Eussen; Martien C J M van Dongen; Hans H C M Savelberg; Annemarie Koster
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Inducing Physical Inactivity in Mice: Preventing Climbing and Reducing Cage Size Negatively Affect Physical Fitness and Body Composition.

Authors:  Peter Roemers; Yasmin Hulst; Steffen van Heijningen; Gertjan van Dijk; Marieke J G van Heuvelen; Peter P De Deyn; Eddy A van der Zee
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 9.  Correlates and Determinants of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Adults: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Johannes Zeiher; Katherine J Ombrellaro; Nita Perumal; Thomas Keil; Gert B M Mensink; Jonas D Finger
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2019-09-03

10.  Isotemporal substitution of sedentary behavior for physical activity on cardiorespiratory fitness in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Xiaojian Yin; Yuqiang Li; Cunjian Bi; Ming Li; Xiaofang Yang; Ting Zhang; Feng Zhang; Junfang Cao; Yaru Guo; Ting Yang; Ge Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.