Literature DB >> 28319495

Endoscopic Stapes Surgery: A Comparison With Microscopic Surgery.

Rhona Sproat1, Constantina Yiannakis, Arunachalam Iyer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate postoperative audiological outcomes and complication rates for fully endoscopic and microscopic stapes surgery carried out by a single surgeon in one center. PATIENTS: All patients having undergone endoscopic and non-endoscopic stapes surgery for otosclerosis from September 2009 to August 2016 under a single surgeon. INTERVENTION(S): Stapedotomy using either an operating microscope or endoscope for visualization. Stapedotomy was carried out using a standard approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pre- and postoperative audiometry and complications.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients who underwent endoscopic stapes surgery and 47 patients who underwent non-endoscopic stapes surgery were included in this study. Seventy-nine percent of both endoscopic and non-endoscopic groups had the average air-bone gap closed to less than 10 dBHL, respectively; the difference was not significant (p = 0.940, χ test). No patients with sensorineural hearing loss, vertigo, or facial nerve paresis were reported. Two of 34 patients (6%) of the endoscopic group had the chorda tympani cut intraoperatively for access compared with 11 of 47 patients (23%) of the non-endoscopic group. Sixteen of 47 patients (34%) required an endaural incision for access in the non-endoscopic group; no endaural incisions were made in the endoscopic group.
CONCLUSION: Air-bone gap closure and patient complications did not vary significantly between endoscopic and non-endoscopic groups in this study of 34 endoscopic procedures. There is a requirement for further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to fully gauge the safety and effectiveness of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28319495     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  7 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic stapes surgery outcomes and complication rates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ricardo Bartel; Juan Jose Sanz; Ignacio Clemente; Gabriela Simonetti; Guillem Viscacillas; Laura Palomino; Isabel Asarta; Xavier Lao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Does endoscopic stapedotomy increase hearing restoration rates comparing to microscopic? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tsetsos Nikolaos; Tsentemeidou Aikaterini; Daskalakis Dimitrios; Blioskas Sarantis; Goudakos John; Tzoi Eleana; Markou Konstantinos
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The role of endoscopic stapes surgery in difficult oval window niche anatomy.

Authors:  Ignacio Javier Fernandez; Marco Bonali; Matteo Fermi; Michael Ghirelli; Domenico Villari; Livio Presutti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  The pre-chorda and post-chorda tympani approach in endoscopic stapes surgery based on the chorda tympani nerve classification.

Authors:  Masahiro Takahashi; Masaomi Motegi; Kazuhisa Yamamoto; Yutaka Yamamoto; Hiromi Kojima
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.236

5.  Endoscopic stapedotomy: safety and audiological results in 150 patients.

Authors:  Luca Bianconi; Luca Gazzini; Elisa Laura; Stefano De Rossi; Alessandro Conti; Daniele Marchioni
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Endoscopic stapedotomy: Merits and demerits.

Authors:  Waleed Moneir; Ahmed Musaad Abd El-Fattah; Eslam Mahmoud; Mohamed Elshaer
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2017-12-13

7.  A comparative study of changes in audiological characteristics when using endoscopic and microscopic stapes surgery in patients with otosclerosis.

Authors:  Yiyang Tang; Minqian Gao; Tao Zhang; Haidi Yang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.