We evaluated the sensitivity and time resolution of a technique for photochemical reaction monitoring based on the interferometric detection of the deformation of liquid films. The reaction products change the local surface tension and induce Marangoni flow in the liquid film. As a model system, we consider the irradiation of the aliphatic hydrocarbon squalane with broadband deep-UV light. We developed a numerical model that quantitatively reproduces the flow patterns observed in the experiments. Moreover, we present self-similarity solutions that elucidate the mechanisms governing different stages of the dynamics and their parametric dependence. Surface tension changes as small as Δγ = 10-6 N/m can be detected, and time resolutions of <1 s can be achieved.
We evaluated the sensitivity and time resolution of a technique for photochemical reaction monitoring based on the interferometric detection of the deformation of liquid films. The reaction products change the local surface tension and induce Marangoni flow in the liquid film. As a model system, we consider the irradiation of the aliphatic hydrocarbon squalane with broadband deep-UV light. We developed a numerical model that quantitatively reproduces the flow patterns observed in the experiments. Moreover, we present self-similarity solutions that elucidate the mechanisms governing different stages of the dynamics and their parametric dependence. Surface tension changes as small as Δγ = 10-6 N/m can be detected, and time resolutions of <1 s can be achieved.
Photochemical
reactions induced by irradiation with ultraviolet
(UV) light are utilized in a large variety of applications such as
surface cleaning,[1−8] antiviral and bactericidal surface disinfection,[9] air and water purification,[10−14] photochemical surface modification,[15−23] wettability alteration,[24−31] material deposition,[32−38] surface charging,[39−41] photolithography,[42,43] and the patterning
of self-assembled monolayers.[44−50] The photopatterning of polymer layers due to photoisomerization
reactions of azobenzene groups has been studied intensively.[51−65]Chowdhury et al.[66] reported on
experiments
regarding UV-induced photopolymerization reactions of aniline films
floating on water. Golovin and Volpert[67,68] studied the
Marangoni instability of a thin liquid layer subject to uniform illumination
that triggers a reversible photochemical reaction. They performed
a linear stability analysis as well as numerical simulations of the
evolution equations for the height and reactant concentration profiles.
Dun et al. studied the laser-pulse-induced deformation of 50-nm-thick
Sb2Te3 films due to a competition between thermocapillary
and solutocapillary effects.[70] A displacement
of material out of the laser spot was observed for low powers, whereas
material accumulation in the laser spot occurred for higher powers.
Verma et al. irradiated polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate)
layers with intense near-UV radiation at 355 nm, which caused local
melting of the polymer. Using various apertures, they were able to
induce relief patterns in the polymer films with a single laser pulse
(∼100 ns).[69] Katzenstein et al.
studied pattern formation after UV illumination of a solid polymer
through a mask and subsequent heating above the glass-transition temperature.[71,72]Arshad et al. presented a perturbation analysis of a coupled
convection-diffusion
model for UV-induced polymer surface deformations and achieved good
agreement with experimental results using polystyrene layers.[73] Kim et al. used a photosensitizer to enhance
the UV-photopatterning effect and concluded that an endoperoxide of
the photosensitizer is a critical reaction intermediate.[74] Adding a photobase generator to a polymer film,
Kim et al. demonstrated that UV-induced material redistribution could
be directed toward either the irradiated or the nonilluminated regions
depending on the mode of exposure using either low-intensity and wavelength-selective
or high-intensity and broad-band illumination. The authors identified
decarboxylation and dehydrogenation reactions as the chemical processes
driving the flow.[75]In this article,
we report on the irradiation of aliphatic, liquid
hydrocarbon films on stationary substrates with deep-UV light through
a mask (Figure a).
Because of photochemical reactions, the chemical composition of the
liquid and thus its surface tension are altered and become spatially
nonuniform. As a consequence, so-called solutocapillary Marangoni
flows[76−98] are induced that redistribute the liquid film. We demonstrate that
measuring the liquid deformation is a sensitive means of monitoring
minute composition changes. We developed a numerical model that quantitatively
reproduces the morphological and dynamical features observed in the
experiments. Moreover, we determined self-similar solutions that illustrate
the mechanisms governing different stages of the dynamics and their
parametric dependence.
Figure 1
(a) Deep-UV radiation from a deuterium lamp is partially
blocked
by a metal mask and partially transmitted to an aliphatic liquid hydrocarbon
film. Because of photochemical reactions, the surface tension increases,
which induces flow toward the illuminated regions and the formation
of a film thickness maximum underneath the unmasked areas. (b) Example
of thin liquid film deformation induced by deep-UV irradiation through
a rectangular aperture of dimensions 0.9 × 10 mm2 (indicated
by the red dashed line). The light and dark optical interference fringes
allow monitoring of the film thickness distribution. Initial film
thickness h0 = 4.8 μm. Image height
4.5 mm.
(a) Deep-UV radiation from a deuterium lamp is partially
blocked
by a metal mask and partially transmitted to an aliphatic liquid hydrocarbon
film. Because of photochemical reactions, the surface tension increases,
which induces flow toward the illuminated regions and the formation
of a film thickness maximum underneath the unmasked areas. (b) Example
of thin liquid film deformation induced by deep-UV irradiation through
a rectangular aperture of dimensions 0.9 × 10 mm2 (indicated
by the red dashed line). The light and dark optical interference fringes
allow monitoring of the film thickness distribution. Initial film
thickness h0 = 4.8 μm. Image height
4.5 mm.
Experimental
Methods
We deposited a thin liquid film of the essentially
nonvolatile
liquid squalane (purity 99%, Aldrich, product number 234311) onto
flat and rigid substrates using spin-coating (Brewer Scientific, model
CEE200). The initial film thickness was varied in the range from 2
to 5 μm. The substrates consisted of sapphire wafers (Precision
Micro-optics, product number PWSP-113112) of thickness dsub = 430 μm and diameter 5 cm. Sapphire is optically
transparent and exhibits a high thermal conductivity of k ≈ 25 W/(mK), which helps to suppress the potential occurrence
of temperature gradients that might mask the effects of concentration
gradients.The viscosity of squalane at 23 °C is μliq = 31.9 mPa s, the surface tension[99] is
γ = 28.15 mN/m, the density[100] is
ρ = 805 kg/m3, and the refractive index is nD = 1.452. The self-diffusion coefficient of
squalane[101] is Ds ≈ 3 × 10–11 m2/s. Kowert
and Watson studied the diffusion of organic solutes in squalane.[102]Deep-UV irradiation was performed with
a 30 W deuterium lamp (Newport,
model number 63163). The effective source diameter is approximately
0.5 mm and is located approximately 20 mm above the squalane film.
The exit window is made from synthetic quartz in order to minimize
the absorption of deep-UV radiation. The effective emission wavelengths
range approximately from 160 to 400 nm. The lamp output does not exhibit
any significant start-up effects for illumination times of less than
1 min. A steady-state value of the intensity is reached within 0.25
s of switching it on, after which the intensity remains constant to
within ±2%.The experiments were performed in either an
air environment or
a chamber flushed with either dry nitrogen or Ar gas. The aperture
consisted of a rectangular slit approximately 1 mm wide and 10 mm
long in a 2-mm-thick Al plate. The separation between the underside
of the Al plate and the squalane film was approximately 0.5 mm. The
effective path length of the deep-UV light from the exit window of
the lamp to the surface of the squalane film was approximately 7.5
mm. The illumination time tUV was varied
between 10 and 60 s. A video of a typical experiment is part of the Supporting Information.For live visualization
of the time evolution of the liquid height
profile h(x, y, t) during and after UV exposure, we used optical interferometry
in a transmission geometry. A high-speed camera (Photron SA-4) fitted
with protective optical filters, a lens system, and a microscope objective
(Leitz Wetzlar NPL 5×, NA = 0.09) was mounted underneath the
substrate. Because the camera was blinded by the broadband illumination,
we introduced a chopper (Thorlabs, model number MC2000) with its blade
(Thorlabs, model number MC1F2) rotating at a frequency of 2 rps. When
the illumination was blocked by the blade, interferometry images were
recorded using an LED light source (Roithner, center wavelength λ
= 625 nm). Figure b shows an example of an interference image. The height difference
represented by two consecutive constructive or destructive interference
fringes corresponds to Δint = λ/(2nD) ≈ 215
nm. The total film thickness modulation is then determined by evaluating
the number of interference fringes between the maximum and minimum
positions indicated by the solid lines in Figure 1b and multiplication by Δint.Interferometry using a single wavelength allows
only the determination
of changes in film thickness, not absolute values. Therefore, we measured
the initial film thickness h0 using a
home-built spectral reflectance system comprising a spectrometer (Ocean
Optics, model USB4000) and a tungsten-halogen broadband light source
(Ocean Optics, model LS-1-LL).
Theoretical Model
It is likely that a number of different chemical species result
from the reaction. In the following text, however, we account for
the photogenerated species by means of a single concentration variable c and assume that surface tension has a linear dependencewith a constant coefficient
of ∂γ/∂c > 0. This is typically
a realistic assumption for nonaqueous
systems as long as the total photochemical conversion is low.Furthermore, we assume that the photoreaction leads to an increase
in the photoproduct concentration at a constant rate proportional
to the local light intensity. This may occur at the liquid–air
interface, z = h, if the absorption
depth is small, α–1 ≪ h0, or homogeneously throughout the thickness of the thin
liquid film if α–1 ≫ h0. Here, α(λ) is the absorption coefficient
of the photochemically active UV radiation. The time scale of the
experiments typically ranges from 10 to 600 s, which by far exceeds
the diffusive time scale s. Consequently, in both cases the concentration
distribution can be assumed to be vertically equilibrated. Thus, we
need to consider only the height-averaged concentration defined aswhich depends
only on the lateral coordinates x and y.The flow of thin, nonvolatile liquid films is governed by
the so-called
lubrication equation[103]whereare the volumetric flow rates,are the Marangoni stresses[86] along the x and y directions
andis the augmented
pressure, representing capillary
and hydrostatic pressure contributions. Here, g =
9.81 m/s2 is the gravitational acceleration. The terms
containing τ and τ represent Marangoni fluxes in response to surface
tension gradients, which are caused by gradients in concentration C of the photoproducts owing to eq . Generally, the direction of Marangoni flow
in thin liquid films is from regions of lower toward regions of higher
surface tension. The nonuniform species distribution that sets up
the surface tension gradients, however, changes continuously because
of diffusion and convection. Therefore, eq is coupled to a convection–diffusion-reaction
equation[104−106] that governs the dynamics of C(x, y, t)The term Rreact(x, y, t) is the
height-integrated photochemical conversion rate with units of length
× concentration/time. We distinguish two different cases: surface-dominated
and bulk-dominated reactions. In the case of a bulk-dominated reaction,
the conversion occurs essentially uniformly across the film thickness.
We set Rreact = hjbulkI(x, y, t), where the factor h stems
from the height integration. Here, jbulk is a constant and I(x, y, t) is the scaled UV intensity distribution
on the substrate. This implicitly requires the film to be optically
thin (αh0 ≪ 1). In the case
of a surface-dominated reaction, the conversion occurs only in a thin
layer adjacent to the liquid–gas interface. The integration
of the reaction rate across the film thickness is therefore independent
of h, and we set Rreact = JsurfI(x, y, t), where Jsurf is assumed to be constant. This includes the cases
of optically thick films (αh0 ≫
1) and reactions that are truly interface-driven.In both cases,
we assume the reaction rate to be proportional to
the light intensity, which is known as the Bunsen–Roscoe law
of reciprocity, which holds for many systems.[107−112] By approximation, the reactant and photoproduct concentrations do
not enter into Rreact because at low conversion
the former essentially remains constant and the latter remains very
small. The parameters jbulk and Jsurf contain the intrinsic rate constant of
the photochemical reaction. We note that these expressions for Rreact with constant parameters jbulk and Jsurf are valid only
for conversions far below 100%, which is appropriate for our experiments.The shape function I(x, y, t) of the UV intensity distribution
depends on the beam profile as well as the aperture shape. We assume
that it is time-independent during the illumination period of 0 ≤ t ≤ tUV and zero afterward.
This means that in the model we neglect the presence of the chopper
in the illumination system. Given that the effective illumination
frequency is 4 Hz and the time scale of typical experiments by far
exceeds 1 s, such a time-averaging procedure is permissible (Supporting Information). We approximated the
shape function aswhere Θ denotes
a smoothed
Heaviside function,[113]w and w are the aperture widths in the x and y directions, and Δt = 1 ms.We solved the set of eqs –7 numerically using the
finite
element software Comsol 3.5a. The dimensions of the computational
domain (0 ≤ x ≤ L, 0 ≤ y ≤ L) are typically 10 times the
aperture width. The boundary conditions were chosen asat x = 0 and x = L andat y = 0
and y = L, all of which represent mirror symmetries. The boundaries
at x = L and y = L are sufficiently remote from the aperture such that the surface
deformation does not reach it within the typical duration of an experiment.The initial conditions are a film of uniform thickness h(x, y, t = 0) = h0 and a uniform photoproduct
concentration C(x, y, t = 0) = 0.
Results
and Discussion
Figure a shows
a typical intensity profile I(x)
corresponding to an infinitely long and 1-mm-wide aperture, i.e.,
for w → ∞
and w = 1 mm. Figure b shows the corresponding
film thickness profiles at different times after commencing deep-UV
irradiation. The initially flat film develops two dimples just outside
and two local maxima just inside the illuminated region. As time progresses,
the dimples deepen and the maxima grow. At t ≈
80 s, the two maxima coalesce into a single maximum located at x = 0. Figure b also contains the definitions of various parameters that quantify
the film thickness modulation: the maximum film thickness increase Δhmax ≡ max[h]
– h0, the maximum film thickness
reduction Δhmin ≡ h0 – min[h], the total
film thickness modulation Δhtot ≡
|Δhmax| + |Δhmin|, and the peak-to-peak film thickness modulation Δhpp.
Figure 2
(a) Intensity distribution I(x) for w = 1 mm and Δw = 0.2 mm. (b) Numerical
simulations of film thickness
profiles h(x, t) at different times t = 0, 20, 50, 80, 120, and
325 s for parameters h0 = 3 μm, w = 1 mm, w = ∞, Δw = 0.2 mm, tUV = 60 s, D = 5 × 10–11 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s). The violet-shaded region
denotes the irradiated area. (c, d) Numerical simulations of the maximum
film thickness increase Δhmax(t) ≡ max[h] – h0 as a function of time for the same parameters as in
panel b. Panels c and d contain the same data in logarithmic and linear
representations, respectively.
(a) Intensity distribution I(x) for w = 1 mm and Δw = 0.2 mm. (b) Numerical
simulations of film thickness
profiles h(x, t) at different times t = 0, 20, 50, 80, 120, and
325 s for parameters h0 = 3 μm, w = 1 mm, w = ∞, Δw = 0.2 mm, tUV = 60 s, D = 5 × 10–11 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s). The violet-shaded region
denotes the irradiated area. (c, d) Numerical simulations of the maximum
film thickness increase Δhmax(t) ≡ max[h] – h0 as a function of time for the same parameters as in
panel b. Panels c and d contain the same data in logarithmic and linear
representations, respectively.Figure c
shows
numerical simulations of Δhmax(t) as a function of time. For t < tUV, we observe to good approximation a power
law time dependence of Δhmax ∼ t1.57 (dashed line). The coalescence of the two
maxima at t ≈ 80 s manifests itself in a steeper
increase in Δhmax. At later times,
the rate of increase of Δhmax slows
down and a peak is reached, after which Δhmax slowly decreases. This is primarily due to lateral diffusion,
which eventually leads to the disappearance of the concentration gradients
that drive Marangoni flow.In Figure , we
present experimental data for the dependence of the total film thickness
modulation Δhtot on the exposure
time tUV. The film thickness modulation Δhtot was evaluated between the central
maximum and one of the minima indicated in Figure b. A higher value of tUV generally leads to a higher concentration of reaction products
and hence to a larger film deformation. The experimental data for tUV = 10 and 20 s are generally very well reproduced
by the two-dimensional model calculations, but those for 40 s are
slightly overestimated. There is a striking difference between experiments
performed in a dry nitrogen environment (filled circles in Figure ) or in an air atmosphere
(open diamonds), with the latter case resulting in a much smaller
thickness modulation. We have also repeated the experiments in an
Ar atmosphere and found that the thickness modulation is comparable
to the experiments in air. We have also done experiments with the
liquid film facing down, i.e., where the UV light is transmitted through
the sapphire substrate before it interacts with squalane. The observed
thickness modulation was only slightly reduced by about 20%. This
small difference is most likely due to absorption losses in the substrate
and increased reflection losses at its two surfaces.
Figure 3
Total film thickness
modulation Δhtot as a function of
time for h0 = 3.6 μm
and three different values of tUV = 10,
20, and 40 s. Filled circles correspond to experimental data obtained
in a nitrogen atmosphere, and the solid lines correspond to two-dimensional
numerical simulations using D = 3 × 10–11 m2/s, w = 0.9 mm, w = 10 mm, Δw = 0.28 mm, and Jsurf(∂γ/∂C) = 3.6 × 10–12 N/s. Open diamonds correspond to experimental data
obtained in an air atmosphere for tUV =
60 s, and the dotted line corresponds to two-dimensional numerical
simulations using D = 3 × 10–11 m2/s, w = 0.9 mm, w = 10 mm, Δw = 0.28 mm, and Jsurf(∂γ/∂C) = 1.2 × 10–13 N/s.
Total film thickness
modulation Δhtot as a function of
time for h0 = 3.6 μm
and three different values of tUV = 10,
20, and 40 s. Filled circles correspond to experimental data obtained
in a nitrogen atmosphere, and the solid lines correspond to two-dimensional
numerical simulations using D = 3 × 10–11 m2/s, w = 0.9 mm, w = 10 mm, Δw = 0.28 mm, and Jsurf(∂γ/∂C) = 3.6 × 10–12 N/s. Open diamonds correspond to experimental data
obtained in an air atmosphere for tUV =
60 s, and the dotted line corresponds to two-dimensional numerical
simulations using D = 3 × 10–11 m2/s, w = 0.9 mm, w = 10 mm, Δw = 0.28 mm, and Jsurf(∂γ/∂C) = 1.2 × 10–13 N/s.In Figure , we
present experimental data for the separation of the film thickness
minima Δxmin as a function of time.
For larger values of h0 and shorter values
of tUV, Δxmin tends to increase in time, whereas it decreases for thin
films and longer irradiation times. The reason for the narrowing in
the latter case is that Marangoni stresses are then strong enough
to further contract the film thickness maximum against opposing capillary
pressure gradients. For sufficiently long times, lateral diffusion
removes concentration gradients and Δxmin increases as a result of capillary pressure relaxation.
The solid lines correspond to numerical 2D simulations using the surface-dominated
reaction model, which reproduce the experimental data quite well.
Figure 4
Separation
of the film thickness minima Δxmin as a function of time for three different values of h0 = 2.3, 3.6, and 4.8 μm and of tUV = 10, 20, or 40 s. Symbols correspond to
experimental data obtained in a nitrogen atmosphere, and the solid
lines correspond to two-dimensional numerical simulations using the
surface-dominated reaction model and parameter values D = 3 × 10–11 m2/s, w = 0.9 mm, w = 10 mm, Δw = 0.28 mm, and Jsurf(∂γ/∂C) = 3.6 × 10–12 N/s.
Separation
of the film thickness minima Δxmin as a function of time for three different values of h0 = 2.3, 3.6, and 4.8 μm and of tUV = 10, 20, or 40 s. Symbols correspond to
experimental data obtained in a nitrogen atmosphere, and the solid
lines correspond to two-dimensional numerical simulations using the
surface-dominated reaction model and parameter values D = 3 × 10–11 m2/s, w = 0.9 mm, w = 10 mm, Δw = 0.28 mm, and Jsurf(∂γ/∂C) = 3.6 × 10–12 N/s.Experimental data for the dependence of the deformation amplitude
on the initial film thickness are depicted in Figure a. Smaller values of h0 give rise to larger values of Δhpp. Numerical data for the film thickness modulation as a function
of h0 evaluated at fixed times are plotted
in Figure b,c on the
basis of the surface- and bulk-dominated reaction models, respectively.
Two different effects are at play. On the one hand, a greater film
thickness translates to a higher mobility of the liquid and thus less
resistance to deformation, thereby promoting an increase in modulation.
Moreover, for bulk-dominated reactions, a greater film thickness implies
a larger quantity of reaction products in the irradiated region. Thus,
we expect that a larger value of h0 thus
tends to amplify the deformation amplitude. This expectation is confirmed
in Figure c, where Δhmax increases monotonically with h0. The “wiggles” are due to the
coalescence phenomenon discussed in the context of Figure b,c, which occurs at later
times for thinner films. The dotted line in Figure c corresponds to a power law of Δhmax ∼ h02/3.
Figure 5
(a) Peak-to-peak film
thickness modulation Δhpp as a function
of time for tUV = 10 s and h0 = 2.3, 3.6, and 4.8 μm.
Symbols represent experimental data obtained in a nitrogen atmosphere,
and solid lines represent 2D numerical simulations using the same
parameters as in Figure . (b, c) One-dimensional simulations of the film thickness modulation
as a function of h0 for surface- (b) and
bulk-dominated (c) reactions. The parameters that were not varied
in panel b were w =
1 mm, w = ∞, Δw = 0.4 mm, tUV = 60
s, D = 3 × 10–11 m2/s, and Jsurf(∂γ/∂C) = 1.8 × 10–12 N/s. The parameters
that were not varied in panel c were w = 1 mm, w = ∞, Δw = 0.2 mm, tUV = 60 s, D = 5 × 10–11 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s).
(a) Peak-to-peak film
thickness modulation Δhpp as a function
of time for tUV = 10 s and h0 = 2.3, 3.6, and 4.8 μm.
Symbols represent experimental data obtained in a nitrogen atmosphere,
and solid lines represent 2D numerical simulations using the same
parameters as in Figure . (b, c) One-dimensional simulations of the film thickness modulation
as a function of h0 for surface- (b) and
bulk-dominated (c) reactions. The parameters that were not varied
in panel b were w =
1 mm, w = ∞, Δw = 0.4 mm, tUV = 60
s, D = 3 × 10–11 m2/s, and Jsurf(∂γ/∂C) = 1.8 × 10–12 N/s. The parameters
that were not varied in panel c were w = 1 mm, w = ∞, Δw = 0.2 mm, tUV = 60 s, D = 5 × 10–11 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s).On the other hand, in the context of the surface-dominated
model,
the photochemical reaction occurs only in a surface layer much thinner
than h0, and the liquid underneath it
serves only to dilute the reaction products. In this case, we expect
a higher value of h0 to reduce the effective
concentration and contribute to a decrease in Δhmax. This behavior is observed in Figure b for initial film thicknesses above approximately
3 μm. For h0 ≲ 3 μm,
the Marangoni stresses are so strong that the film thins almost completely,
i.e., |Δhmin| approaches its maximum
possible value h0. The dashed–dotted
line in Figure b corresponds
to a power law of Δhtot ∼ h01/2.The solid lines in Figure a corresponding to 2D simulations according to the
surface-dominated
reaction model reproduce the experimental data well. We conclude that
the surface-dominated model is relevant to our experimental system
of squalane irradiated by a deuterium lamp. This could mean that the
penetration depth of the photoactive wavelengths is much smaller than h0 or that the reaction is governed by processes
primarily occurring at the interface, after which the reaction products
diffuse into the bulk.Figure a–c
illustrates the sensitivity of the main experimental observable Δhmax(t) with respect
to variations in three key parameters: the photochemically induced
rate of change of surface tension jbulk(∂γ/∂C), the diffusion coefficient D, and the aperture width w. A larger surface tension increase will lead to
a higher Marangoni flow and thus a higher film thickness increase.
The dashed line in Figure a corresponds to a proportionality relation Δhmax ∼ jbulk(∂γ/∂C), whereas the dotted line corresponds to the power law Δhmax ∼ [jbulk(∂γ/∂C)]1/3.
Figure 6
(a) Numerical simulations of Δhmax as a function of the rate of increase of surface tension jbulk(∂γ/∂C) at different times t = 20, 40, 80, 130, 300, and
1000 s. (b) Δhmax as a function
of the diffusion coefficient D at different times t = 20, 40, 80, 130, and 1000 s. The dashed vertical line
indicates the self-diffusion coefficient of squalane. (c) Δhmax as a function of aperture width w at different times t = 20, 40, 80, 130, 300, and 1000 s. The parameters that
were not varied in panel a–c were h0 = 3 μm, w =
1 mm, w = ∞, Δw = 0.2 mm, tUV = 60
s, D = 5 × 10–11 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s). The bulk-dominated
reaction model was used.
(a) Numerical simulations of Δhmax as a function of the rate of increase of surface tension jbulk(∂γ/∂C) at different times t = 20, 40, 80, 130, 300, and
1000 s. (b) Δhmax as a function
of the diffusion coefficient D at different times t = 20, 40, 80, 130, and 1000 s. The dashed vertical line
indicates the self-diffusion coefficient of squalane. (c) Δhmax as a function of aperture width w at different times t = 20, 40, 80, 130, 300, and 1000 s. The parameters that
were not varied in panel a–c were h0 = 3 μm, w =
1 mm, w = ∞, Δw = 0.2 mm, tUV = 60
s, D = 5 × 10–11 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s). The bulk-dominated
reaction model was used.A larger diffusion coefficient leads to a faster broadening
of
the concentration profile, which reduces the Marangoni stress and
tends to decrease Δhmax. The effect
of D on Δhmax depicted
in Figure b is relatively
weak, especially for short times t ≲ 100 s
and small values of D ≲ 5 × 10–11m2/s. The diffusion coefficient becomes more important
for times t comparable to the diffusive time scale w2/D ≈ 2 × 104s.A larger value of w leads to a longer coalescence time tcoa of the initially separate film thickness maxima (about
80 s in Figure b).
This implies
that for a fixed instance of time t ≪ tcoa, the local height profile near the perimeter
of the aperture essentially corresponds to that of an infinitely wide
aperture. Thus, Δhmax becomes independent
of w in Figure c for sufficiently large w. For very small values of w, the overall quantity of
photogenerated species decreases, leading to a decrease in Δhmax with decreasing w. The dashed–dotted line in Figure c corresponds to
the power law relation Δhmax ∼ w1/2.There is little qualitative difference
between the two reaction
models as far as the dependencies on ∂γ/∂c, D, and w are concerned. Data analogous to that presented
in Figure a–c
but obtained with the surface-dominated model are presented as part
of the Supporting Information.
Self-Similar Behavior
To elucidate
the dominant mechanisms that govern different stages of the redistribution
process, we derived self-similar solutions of the governing equations
(eqs and 7). A finite value of the aperture width w constitutes an imposed length scale,
which leads to the coalescence phenomenon discussed in the context
of Figure b and precludes
self-similar behavior. Therefore, we consider here the local dynamics
at the perimeter of very wide (i.e., semi-infinite) apertures. Although
we can eliminate w from
the problem in this fashion, we do have the other (imposed) length
scale Δw to consider. Consequently, we can
identify only self-similar solutions that are restricted in their
validity to certain time intervals, when the solution is either no
longer or not yet affected by the value of Δw.We assume that locallyholds and first consider
shallow transitions, i.e., large values of Δw. In this case, the concentration gradients are small, and species
redistribution due to both Marangoni convection and diffusion in eq can be neglected compared
to the photochemical production. This is the limit of large Damköhler
numbers. Thus, for the bulk-dominated reaction model, one expects C to increase linearly in time with a rate equal to jbulkFigure a compares the prediction of eq with full numerical solutions
of C′ ≡ C/(jbulkt) as a function of x/Δw for 1 × 10–3 ≤ t ≤ 4 × 101 s,
i.e., more than 4 orders of magnitude in time. The curves indeed all
collapse, indicating that eq is an excellent approximation. Consequently, the surface
tension gradient can be written in the formFor large values of Δw, flow due to capillary pressure gradients can be neglected compared
to Marangoni flow in the illuminated region. Moreover, for the initially
small deformation amplitudes Δh ≡ h – h0 ≪ h0, flow due to hydrostatic pressure gradients
can also be neglected. In this case, eq becomes separable and the Ansatz yieldsin the limit of Δh ≪ h0. This solution is represented by the black
solid line in Figure b, which is an excellent approximation to the full numerical solution
of the full equations (eqs and 7).
Figure 7
(a) Comparison of eq (red solid line) with
corresponding numerical solutions of the full
nonlinear equations (eqs and 7) (blue symbols) for times 10–3 ≤ t ≤ 40 s. For the latter, the relevant
parameter values were h0 = 3 μm, Δw = 2 mm, tUV = 600 s, D = 5 × 10–11 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s). (b) Film thickness modulation Δhmax(t) for two examples
of a very shallow (Δw = 2 mm, tUV = 600 s, D = 5 × 10–11m2/s) and a very abrupt (Δw = 2
μm, tUV = 10 s, D = 5 × 10–13m2/s) transition. The
other parameter values were h0 = 3 μm
and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s). (c) Self-similar
solution of eq (solid
line) as well as corresponding numerical solutions (symbols) of the
full nonlinear equations (eqs and 7) for times 0.01 ≤ t ≤ 10 s. For the latter, the relevant parameter
values were h0 = 3 μm, Δw = 2 μm, tUV = 60 s, D = 5 × 10–11 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s). (d) Self-similar solutions
ϕon (κ = 1, solid line) and −ϕoff (κ = 0, dashed line) of eq as well as corresponding numerical solutions
(symbols) of the full nonlinear equations (eqs and 7) for times 10–4 ≤ t ≤ 10 s (green
circles) and 40 ≤ t ≤ 1000 s (red squares),
respectively. For the latter, the relevant parameter values were h0 = 3 μm, Δw =
2 μm, tUV = 10 s, D = 5 × 10–13 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s).
(a) Comparison of eq (red solid line) with
corresponding numerical solutions of the full
nonlinear equations (eqs and 7) (blue symbols) for times 10–3 ≤ t ≤ 40 s. For the latter, the relevant
parameter values were h0 = 3 μm, Δw = 2 mm, tUV = 600 s, D = 5 × 10–11 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s). (b) Film thickness modulation Δhmax(t) for two examples
of a very shallow (Δw = 2 mm, tUV = 600 s, D = 5 × 10–11m2/s) and a very abrupt (Δw = 2
μm, tUV = 10 s, D = 5 × 10–13m2/s) transition. The
other parameter values were h0 = 3 μm
and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s). (c) Self-similar
solution of eq (solid
line) as well as corresponding numerical solutions (symbols) of the
full nonlinear equations (eqs and 7) for times 0.01 ≤ t ≤ 10 s. For the latter, the relevant parameter
values were h0 = 3 μm, Δw = 2 μm, tUV = 60 s, D = 5 × 10–11 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s). (d) Self-similar solutions
ϕon (κ = 1, solid line) and −ϕoff (κ = 0, dashed line) of eq as well as corresponding numerical solutions
(symbols) of the full nonlinear equations (eqs and 7) for times 10–4 ≤ t ≤ 10 s (green
circles) and 40 ≤ t ≤ 1000 s (red squares),
respectively. For the latter, the relevant parameter values were h0 = 3 μm, Δw =
2 μm, tUV = 10 s, D = 5 × 10–13 m2/s, and jbulk(∂γ/∂C) = 6 × 10–7 N/(m s).For a sharp transition in the reaction rate, i.e., for small
values
of Δw, the pressure-driven flow is locked onto
the Marangoni flow because of the phenomenon of capillary choking[117] (Appendix A). The Marangoni
convection term scales asi.e., quadratically with time t. Consequently, both convective terms are negligible compared
to the diffusive term scaling as Djbulkt/(Δw)2, i.e.,
linearly with t, at early times. This corresponds
to the limit of a large convective Damköhler number and a diffusive
Damköhler number of order 1. Thus, in the limit of Δh ≪ h0 or equivalently h ≈ h0, the 1D reaction–convection–diffusion
equation can be simplified toFor an abrupt
transition, the intensity distribution I(x) and thus the reaction rate term are
scale-invariant, i.e., I(x) = I(kx), for arbitrary positive numbers k. Introducing the reduced concentration C′ ≡ C/(jbulkt) allows us to derive (Appendix
A) the following ordinary differential equation (ODE) in the
self-similar coordinate ξ ≡ x/(Dt)1/2The corresponding self-similar
solution for C′(ξ) is plotted as the
solid line in Figure c alongside numerical
solutions of the full set of equations (eqs and 7) for three decades
in time 0.01 ≤ t ≤ 10 s (symbols).Next, we determine a similarity solution for the evolution of the
height profile h(x, t). A small value of Δw implies that initially
the Marangoni stress driving the film deformation is present only
in an exceedingly narrow interval, outside of which the only driving
force is given by capillary pressure gradients. Consequently, at the
borders of this interval, a flux continuity condition must hold, which
provides the above-mentioned linkage between capillary and Marangoni
fluxes.[117] If we set τ ≡ Atκ δ(x) and seek a self-similar solution in the variable ϕ(η)
≡ Δh/(Dβtβ), where η ≡ x/(Etα) is the self-similarity coordinate,
then its validity in the region outside the narrow interval implies
the capillary scaling α = 1/4.[114−116] Here, Dβ and E are constants that render
ϕ and η dimensionless. The flux continuity determines
the value of . For details, we refer the reader to Appendix A.The self-similar solution for C ∼ tC′(ξ) is decoupled from Δh(x, t) because
at early times convective
mass fluxes can be neglected compared to the reactive and diffusive
contributions. Consequently, the effective concentration difference
between illuminated and unilluminated regions scales as ΔC (t ≤ tUV) ∼ t1 or ΔC (t > tUV) = const ∼ t0 before and after switching off the UV light, respectively.
If the width of the transition zone of the concentration distribution
can be considered to be an exceedingly narrow interval despite its
diffusive broadening (as far as the flow field is concerned), then
the exponents in the relation τ = Atκδ(x) have values of κon = 1 and κoff = 0. This implies βon = 3/2 and βoff = 1/2, respectively. The dashed and dotted lines Figure b correspond to power law relations Δh ∼ t3/2 and Δh ∼ t1/2, respectively,
which reproduce the behavior of the full numerical solutions (symbols)
very well. Also, the time exponent of 1.57 in Figure c is close to 3/2, and the origin of the
deviation is that Δw = 0.2 mm is not sufficiently
abrupt.We have also compared the full numerical solutions of eqs and 7 for Δw = 2 μm depicted in Figure b with the self-similar
height profiles ϕ(η)
determined from solving eq . The solid line in Figure d represents ϕon, i.e., the on stage
(β = 3/2), which is an excellent approximation to the numerical
data (symbols) for 5 decades in time 10–4 ≤ t ≤ 10 s. The dashed line represents −ϕoff, i.e., the off stage (β = 1/2), which approximates
the amplitude and shape of the numerical data (symbols) very well
for 40 ≤ t ≤ 1000 s. We inverted the
sign of ϕoff merely to avoid excessive overlap between
the curves. The apparent lateral shift between −ϕoff and the numerical data is caused by the progressive convection
of the concentration distribution, which eq does not account for.Finally, we
note that in the limit of small deformations the self-similar
solutions derived above are equally relevant to the surface- and bulk-dominated
reaction models because the structure of eq is identical in the limit of h ≈ h0.
Reaction
Mechanism
Deep UV irradiation
in an air environment can lead to ozone formation and the partial
oxidation of hydrocarbon surfaces as exploited technologically for
surface cleaning.[1] Thus, our initial expectation
was that ozone generation and the subsequent oxidation of squalane
are likely candidates for the dominant reaction pathway. In striking
contrast, the experimental results obtained in air and nitrogen atmospheres
shown in Figure indicate
that oxygen plays more the role of an inhibitor rather than a promotor
of the reaction. Consistent with our findings in Figure , Bruggeman et al. state that
the presence of oxygen may become a rate-limiting factor because of
its reactivity with short-lived hydrogen and carbon radicals.[125]Generally, photochemical reactions are
complex and require sophisticated experimental instrumentation for
the elucidation of reaction mechanisms, rates, and product distributions.[118−125] Yang et al. studied the photolysis of liquid cyclohexane at 147
nm, with the primary product being cyclohexene. They concluded that
the presence of benzene caused a drastic reduction in the rate of
cyclohexane decomposition due to the scavenging of hydrogen atoms.[118] Holroyd determined the principal primary process
at 147 nm in n-pentane to be H2 elimination
and the formation of hydrogen atoms and pentyl radicals.[119] Nurmukhametov et al. exposed polystyrene films
and solutions to 248 nm radiation and concluded that the UV-induced
reaction includes the dehydrogenation of the molecular chain and the
subsequent formation of polyconjugated polyene chains.[123] Bossa et al. developed and validated a kinetic
model for methane ice photochemistry upon irradiation with UV light
in the 120–200 nm wavelength range.[124] We therefore suspect that alkene formation might occur in our experiments.
Consistent with this hypothesis, Birdi found that the surface tension
values of n-alkenes are systematically higher than
those of corresponding n-alkanes by approximately
0.5–1%.[126]One possible conclusion
from Figure a was
that squalane is an optically thick material
for deep-UV radiation. Moreover, we mentioned that the measured thickness
modulation is comparable for the liquid film facing up or facing down.
This may suggest that the crucial requirement for the reaction is
not so much the presence or absence of ambient gases but rather the
presence or absence of dissolved gases in the liquid. Given the small
liquid film thickness, the diffusion of gases into squalane after
spin-coating requires less than 1 s, which is much shorter than the
time required for mounting the sample.
Implications
for Reaction Monitoring
The experimentally adjustable parameters
of this technique are the
initial film thickness h0, the aperture
size w, and the illumination
time tUV. The extractable parameters are
the surface tension change Δγ = γ
– γ0 and the diffusion coefficient D. Our experiments were restricted to a constant aperture
width w ≈ 1 mm,
which implied that they had a low sensitivity toward variations in D. According to our simulations, however, which are well
validated by the gathered experimental data, we expect that smaller
slit widths allow more conclusive information regarding the value
of D. The achievable time resolution is determined
by how quickly a measurable grayscale modulation is observed in the
interferometry images. On the basis of the numerical results and a
required minimum thickness modulation Δhtot ≈ 50 nm, we estimate that a time resolution of several
seconds is feasible for the relatively weak surface tension changes
occurring in squalane. We have specifically selected squalane in order
to demonstrate that relatively subtle chemical composition changes
can be detected conveniently. According to eq , the response time will be faster for more
intense irradiation, e.g., by using laser sources, for reactions that
exhibit higher conversion rates or more surface-active reaction products,
for thicker films, lower viscosities, and smaller values of Δw.We note that the oblong geometry of the
aperture (w = 1 mm ≪ w = 10 mm < ∞) enhances
the sensitivity of the method compared to a 1D geometry (w → ∞) by up to approximately
30% for w ≈ 1
mm because the end effect increases the height of the maximum. The
maximum is free to stretch along the y direction,
thereby minimizing reductions of Δhmax induced by capillary confinement. By comparison, for a square aperture
(w = w = 1 mm), the enhancement compared to
the 1D geometry is only a few percent for typical parameter values.We note further that in the dilute regime considered in this article
the method is sensitive only to products jbulk(∂γ/∂C) and Jsurf(∂γ/∂C) but not
independently to Jsurf and ∂γ/∂C. This is a consequence of the fact that the concentration
of the reaction product scales with the production rate constants jbulk and Jsurf.
The lubrication equation is coupled to the concentration field via
the Marangoni stresses, e.g. , which thus depend only on the above-mentioned
products. Consequently, the height profile h and
fluxes Q and Q, which enter into eq , depend only on products jbulk(∂γ/∂C) and Jsurf(∂γ/∂C). The same, therefore, holds for the Peclet number inherent
in eq .
Summary
We have studied broadband deep-UV irradiation
of thin liquid films
of the aliphatic hydrocarbon squalane through a slit aperture. This
served as a model system for monitoring photochemical reactions based
on the interferometric detection of film thickness deformations. The
mechanism driving material redistribution is solutocapillary Marangoni
flow as a consequence of surface tension changes induced by the reaction
products. Because of the differential nature of Marangoni flows, a
high sensitivity of the technique can be achieved. Surface tension
changes of as small as Δγ = 10–6 N/m can be detected, and time resolutions below 1 s can be achieved.
We performed systematic experiments where we varied the film thickness
and illumination time. Interestingly, experiments performed in a nitrogen
atmosphere resulted in a significantly stronger film deformation than
experiments performed in either air or Ar environments. We also developed
a model of the photochemical reaction and the convection and diffusion
of the reaction products. Although the model takes into account only
a single photoproduct species, it reproduces the experimental results
almost quantitatively, if we assume that the reaction occurs primarily
in a region close to the liquid surface that is much smaller than
the film thickness. The main output parameter of the numerical simulations
is the product of the reaction rate and the rate of change of surface
tension with the photoproduct concentration. By using narrower aperture
widths, information on the diffusion coefficient of the photoproduct
species could also be gathered. Besides performing numerical simulations,
we also derived and numerically validated self-similar solutions of
the governing equations for the concentration and the height profiles,
which characterize the early time response.
Authors: Kevin Critchley; Jeyaratnam P Jeyadevan; Hitoshi Fukushima; Masaya Ishida; Tatsuya Shimoda; Richard J Bushby; Stephen D Evans Journal: Langmuir Date: 2005-05-10 Impact factor: 3.882
Authors: Lei Zhao; Serena Seshadri; Xichen Liang; Sophia J Bailey; Michael Haggmark; Michael Gordon; Matthew E Helgeson; Javier Read de Alaniz; Paolo Luzzatto-Fegiz; Yangying Zhu Journal: ACS Cent Sci Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 14.553