Literature DB >> 28319336

Impact of mild to severe hemophilia on engagement in recreational activities by US men, women, and children with hemophilia B: The Bridging Hemophilia B Experiences, Results and Opportunities into Solutions (B-HERO-S) study.

Kimberly Baumann1, Grace Hernandez2, Michelle Witkop3, Skye Peltier1, Spencer Dunn2, Susan Cutter4, Neil Frick5, Kimberly Haugstad6, Christine Guelcher7, Mary Jane Frey8, Dawn Rotellini5, David B Clark9, Neeraj N Iyer10, David L Cooper10.   

Abstract

The psychosocial impact of hemophilia on activities was recently investigated in the Hemophilia Experiences, Results and Opportunities (HERO) study (675 people with hemophilia and 561 caregivers of children with hemophilia in 10 countries). The impact of hemophilia B may not be accurately reflected in the HERO results, as ~75% of respondents described issues affecting males with hemophilia A. To address the needs of this population, the Bridging Hemophilia B Experiences, Results and Opportunities Into Solutions (B-HERO-S) was developed as a pilot study in the United States in collaboration with the hemophilia community. The analysis reported here assessed engagement in recreational activities and changes to treatment regimens around activities as reported by 299 adults with hemophilia B and 150 caregivers of children with hemophilia B. Nearly all adults with hemophilia B (98%) experienced a negative impact on their participation in recreational activities due to hemophilia-related issues, and most caregivers (90%) reported that hemophilia B had a negative impact on their child's engagement in recreational activities. One of the main reasons identified for discontinuing past activities was the risk of bruising or bleeding (adults/children with hemophilia B, 49%/41%). In particular, adults with hemophilia B reported a history of activity-related bleeding, and most adults decreased their participation in high-risk activities as they aged. Substantial percentages of adults and children with hemophilia B (including mild/moderate severity) altered their treatment regimens to accommodate planned activities. These findings may help inform guidelines for individualizing treatment regimens around participation in recreational activities based on hemophilia severity, baseline factor level, and activity risk and intensity.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activities; hemophilia B; psychosocial; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28319336     DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Haematol        ISSN: 0902-4441            Impact factor:   2.997


  5 in total

1.  Hemophilia without prophylaxis: Assessment of joint range of motion and factor activity.

Authors:  Michael Wang; Michael Recht; Neeraj N Iyer; David L Cooper; J Michael Soucie
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-07-06

2.  Health-related quality of life in paediatric haemophilia B patients treated with rIX-FP.

Authors:  Sylvia von Mackensen; Jinesh Shah; Wilfried Seifert; Gili Kenet
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 3.  How to discuss gene therapy for haemophilia? A patient and physician perspective.

Authors:  Wolfgang Miesbach; Brian O'Mahony; Nigel S Key; Mike Makris
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 4.  Achieving the unimaginable: Health equity in haemophilia.

Authors:  Mark W Skinner; Diane Nugent; Pam Wilton; Brian O'Mahony; Gerry Dolan; Jamie O'Hara; Erik Berntorp
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.287

5.  A new measure to assess pain in people with haemophilia: The Multidimensional Haemophilia Pain Questionnaire (MHPQ).

Authors:  Ana Cristina Paredes; Patrício Costa; Armando Almeida; Patrícia R Pinto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.