Literature DB >> 28319316

Barriers to the management of obstructed defaecation according to colorectal surgeons.

N Al-Mozany1,2,3, C Wright1,2, G O'Grady3, C J Young1,2, M J Solomon1,2,3.   

Abstract

AIM: Obstructed defaecation (OD) has a high prevalence and high disease impact; however, patients often experience suboptimal management. This problem reflects the complex pathophysiology of OD as well as health service delivery factors. This study aimed to identify the factors that act as a barrier to effective management of OD as perceived by specialist colorectal surgeons treating this disorder.
METHOD: A postal questionnaire was administered to a bi-national sampling of colorectal specialists in Australia and New Zealand who were registered with their specialty society. Questions addressed variables relevant in OD management, including clinical access, decision-making, patient factors and surgeon experience and perceptions, and used Likert scales. Statistical analyses compared surgeon practice variables.
RESULTS: The response rate was 68.5% (n = 113). Most surgeons managed OD (94%), and preferred to treat OD patients themselves (87%); however, 33% of these respondents were dissatisfied with their management, 46% felt they lacked management expertise and 33% stated they had inadequate expertise in OD investigations. Clinical investigation services were more limited in private than public practice, and many surgeons lacked access to biofeedback (31%). Other barriers included heterogeneity in decision-making by surgeon age and practice location (P < 0.05), dual pathologies (e.g. irritable bowel syndrome) and psychological factors, and limited uptake of multidisciplinary services and standardized (Rome) diagnostic criteria.
CONCLUSION: Barriers to OD management include surgeon-specific factors, patient-specific factors and healthcare access factors. Increased utilization of pelvic floor and multidisciplinary services, increased training and standardization of OD investigations and improved access to specialist investigations and allied-health management services could improve outcomes for OD. Colorectal Disease
© 2017 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delivery of health care; constipation; pelvic floor; psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28319316     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  1 in total

1.  The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Auerilius Erastus Ricardo Hamilton; Amelia Alice Lin; Christopher John Young
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2020-04-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.