Literature DB >> 28319267

Risk factors associated with failure of treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy.

Ying-Cheng Chiang1, Yi-An Tu1, Jehn-Hsiahn Yang1, Shin-Yu Lin1, Chien-Nan Lee1, Jin-Chung Shih1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with treatment failure among women with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).
METHODS: In a retrospective study, the medical records of patients with CSP treated at National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, from 1994 to 2015 were reviewed. The women were managed primarily with hysterotomy, evacuation, or methotrexate. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the factors associated with treatment failure.
RESULTS: Among 90 patients, 44 underwent hysterotomy, 18 underwent evacuation, and 28 received methotrexate. The success rates were 100% (44/44) for hysterotomy, 83% (15/18) for evacuation, and 57% (16/28) for methotrexate (P<0.001). ROC curve analysis indicated that a pregnancy length of 8 weeks and a mean sac diameter (MSD) of 4 cm were both predictive of failure of treatment by primary evacuation and methotrexate. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, an MSD of 4 cm or more was the only independent risk factor for treatment failure (odds ratio 68.99, 95% confidence interval 6.27-759.60; P=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Primary hysterotomy was suitable for treatment of CSP of any size. Failure of primary evacuation or methotrexate usually occurred when the MSD was larger than 4 cm.
© 2017 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean scar pregnancy; Evacuation; Hysterotomy; Mean sac diameter; Methotrexate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28319267     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  3 in total

1.  New ultrasound grading system for cesarean scar pregnancy and its implications for management strategies: An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Shin-Yu Lin; Chia-Jung Hsieh; Yi-An Tu; Yi-Ping Li; Chien-Nan Lee; Wen-Wei Hsu; Jin-Chung Shih
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The Efficacy and Health Economics of Different Treatments for Type 1 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Tingting Hong; Zeying Chai; Manman Liu; Lingzhi Zheng; Feng Qi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Selection of Laparoscopy or Laparotomy for Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Peiying Fu; Ting Zhou; Pengfei Cui; Wenwen Wang; Shixuan Wang; Ronghua Liu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-09-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.