| Literature DB >> 28319187 |
S Kathleen Bandt1, Jarod L Roland2, Mrinal Pahwa3, Carl D Hacker3,4, David T Bundy5, Jonathan D Breshears6, Mohit Sharma3, Joshua S Shimony4,7, Eric C Leuthardt2,3,4,8,9.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The brain's functional architecture of interconnected network-related oscillatory patterns in discrete cortical regions has been well established with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies or direct cortical electrophysiology from electrodes placed on the surface of the brain, or electrocorticography (ECoG). These resting state networks exhibit a robust functional architecture that persists through all stages of sleep and under anesthesia. While the stability of these networks provides a fundamental understanding of the organization of the brain, understanding how these regions can be perturbed is also critical in defining the brain's ability to adapt while learning and recovering from injury.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28319187 PMCID: PMC5358752 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173448
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patient Demographics & Clinical Information.
| Patient | Age | Gender | Handedness | Pathology | Location | Preoperative Neuro Exam | Postoperative Neuro Exam |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 48 | M | Right | GBM | L Temporal | Confused, expressive dysphasia | Improved; fluent speech with subtle naming deficit |
| B | 64 | F | Right | GBM | L Parietal | Confused, dysgraphia | Improved; normal exam |
| C | 54 | F | Right | GBM | L Parietal | Expressive dysphasia, dyscalculia, dysgraphia, R/L confusion | Improved; persistent subtle expressive dysphasia |
| D | 77 | F | Right | GBM | L Temporal | Expressive dysphasia | Improved, intermittent paraphasias |
| E | 69 | F | Right | GBM | L Temporal | History of acute 6wks prior to presentation, resolved at time of presentation | Normal exam |
| F | 55 | M | Right | GBM | L Temporo-occipital | Expressive dysphasia | Stable; expressive dysphasia |
GBM = Glioblastoma; M = Male; F = Female; R = Right; L = Left.
Fig 1Intraoperative Photograph.
(A) Exposed cortical surface demonstrating gross tumor. (B) Axial MRI slice from same patient identifying left temporo-occipital tumor. (C) Intraoperative ECoG grid on cortical surface for mapping.
Fig 2Preoperative MR Imaging.
Representative axial slices demonstrating preoperative T2 weighted (upper panel) and contrast enhanced T1 weighted (lower panel) MR imaging demonstrating intracranial neoplasm in each patient.
Power-law spectral fit.
| Patient | Tumor R2 values | Distant R2 value |
|---|---|---|
| A | 0.989 | 0.982 |
| B | 0.732 | 0.914 |
| C | 0.976 | 0.991 |
| D | 0.991 | 0.988 |
| E | 0.991 | 0.982 |
| F | 0.907 | 0.968 |
Fig 3Power spectra comparing tumor (red) and distant (blue) spectral densities from each individual subject.
Fig 4A. Bar plot demonstrating comparison between average correlation values between all tumor electrode pairs (red) and all distant electrode pairs (blue). This suggests that connectivity is maintained within cortical regions invaded by glioma. B. Bar histogram demonstrating comparison between distributions of correlation values (detrended for distance) between tumor electrodes (red) and a multiply permuted and resampled subpopulation of distant electrodes (blue) normalized to their respective probability density functions. This accounts for differences in the number of tumor electrodes compared to distant electrodes as well as smaller inter-electrode differences in the tumor electrode subgroup. There was no significant difference between the two groups
Fig 5Patient specific correlation matrices demonstrating representative correlation maps with seeds placed centrally within each patient’s tumor (left column) and remotely within distant cortex (right column) for each individual subject.