Literature DB >> 28318695

Monitoring water quality in Toronto's urban stormwater ponds: Assessing participation rates and data quality of water sampling by citizen scientists in the FreshWater Watch.

Andrew B Scott1, Paul C Frost2.   

Abstract

From 2013 to 2015, citizen scientist volunteers in Toronto, Canada were trained to collect and analyze water quality in urban stormwater ponds. This volunteer sampling was part of the research program, FreshWater Watch (FWW), which aimed to standardize urban water sampling efforts from around the globe. We held training sessions for new volunteers twice yearly and trained a total of 111 volunteers. Over the course of project, ~30% of volunteers participated by collecting water quality data after the training session with 124 individual sampling events at 29 unique locations in Toronto, Canada. A few highly engaged volunteers were most active, with 50% of the samples collected by 5% of trainees. Stormwater ponds generally have poor water quality demonstrated by elevated phosphate concentrations (~30μg/L), nitrate (~427μg/L), and turbidity relative to Canadian water quality standards. Compared to other urban waterbodies in the global program, nutrient concentrations in Toronto's urban stormwater ponds were lower, while turbidity was not markedly different. Toronto FWW (FWW-TO) data was comparable to that measured by standard lab analyses and matched results from previous studies of stormwater ponds in Toronto. Combining observational and chemical data acquired by citizen scientists, macrophyte dominated ponds had lower phosphate concentrations while phytoplankton dominated ponds had lower nitrate concentrations, which indicates a potentially important and unstudied role of internal biogeochemical processes on pond nutrient dynamics. This experience in the FWW demonstrates the capabilities and constraints of citizen science when applied to water quality sampling. While analytical limits on in-field analyses produce higher uncertainty in water quality measurements of individual sites, rapid data collection is possible but depends on the motivation and engagement of the group of volunteers. Ongoing efforts in citizen science will thus need to address sampling effort and analytical limits to fully realize the potential value of engaging citizen scientists in water quality sampling.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Citizen science; Nitrate; Phosphate; Toronto; Urban stormwater ponds; Water quality

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28318695     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  Toward sustainable environmental quality: Priority research questions for Europe.

Authors:  Paul J Van den Brink; Alistair B A Boxall; Lorraine Maltby; Bryan W Brooks; Murray A Rudd; Thomas Backhaus; David Spurgeon; Violaine Verougstraete; Charmaine Ajao; Gerald T Ankley; Sabine E Apitz; Kathryn Arnold; Tomas Brodin; Miguel Cañedo-Argüelles; Jennifer Chapman; Jone Corrales; Marie-Agnès Coutellec; Teresa F Fernandes; Jerker Fick; Alex T Ford; Gemma Giménez Papiol; Ksenia J Groh; Thomas H Hutchinson; Hank Kruger; Jussi V K Kukkonen; Stefania Loutseti; Stuart Marshall; Derek Muir; Manuel E Ortiz-Santaliestra; Kai B Paul; Andreu Rico; Ismael Rodea-Palomares; Jörg Römbke; Tomas Rydberg; Helmut Segner; Mathijs Smit; Cornelis A M van Gestel; Marco Vighi; Inge Werner; Elke I Zimmer; Joke van Wensem
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 2.  Applying citizen science to monitor for the Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.3.2: a review.

Authors:  Lauren Quinlivan; Deborah V Chapman; Timothy Sullivan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Characterizing the Breadth and Depth of Volunteer Water Monitoring Programs in the United States.

Authors:  Kristine F Stepenuck; Kenneth D Genskow
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Opportunities, approaches and challenges to the engagement of citizens in filling small water body data gaps.

Authors:  M Kelly-Quinn; J N Biggs; S Brooks; P Fortuño; S Hegarty; J I Jones; F Regan
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.822

5.  Getting the full picture: Assessing the complementarity of citizen science and agency monitoring data.

Authors:  Jeneen Hadj-Hammou; Steven Loiselle; Daniel Ophof; Ian Thornhill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A novel approach for assessing watershed susceptibility using weighted overlay and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) methodology: a case study in Eagle Creek Watershed, USA.

Authors:  Fadhil K Jabbar; Katherine Grote; Robert E Tucker
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 4.223

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.