Literature DB >> 28318597

The timing of surgery of antenatally diagnosed choledochal malformations: A descriptive analysis of a 26-year nationwide cohort.

Maria H A van den Eijnden1, Ruben H de Kleine2, Ivo de Blaauw3, Paul M J G Peeters2, Bart G P Koot4, Matthijs W N Oomen5, Cornelius E J Sloots6, Wim G van Gemert7, David C van der Zee8, L W Ernest van Heurn5, Henkjan J Verkade9, Jim C H Wilde10, Jan B F Hulscher11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Choledochal malformations (CMs) are increasingly diagnosed antenatally. There is a dilemma between early surgery to prevent CM-related symptoms and postponing surgery to reduce complications. We aimed to identify the optimal timing of surgery in asymptomatic neonates with antenatally diagnosed CM and to identify predictors for development of symptoms.
METHODS: Using the Netherlands Study group on CHoledochal Cyst/malformation (NeSCHoc) we retrospectively collected demographic, biochemical and surgical data from all Dutch patients with an antenatally detected CM.
RESULTS: Between 1989 and 2014, antenatally suspected CM was confirmed in 17 patients at a median age of 10days (1day-2months). Four patients developed symptoms directly after birth (24%). Thirteen patients (76%) remained asymptomatic. Two of these progressed to symptoms before surgical intervention at 0.7 and 2.1months resp. Postoperatively, four patients developed short-term complications and three developed long-term complications. Patients <5.6kg (the series median) showed more short-term complications (66%) when compared to patients >5.6kg (0%, p=0.02).
CONCLUSION: When not symptomatic within the first days of life, the majority of children with antenatally detected CM remains asymptomatic. Surgery might safely be delayed to the age of 6months or a weight of 6kg. Postponing surgery in the clinically and biochemical asymptomatic patient might decrease the complication rate. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antenatal diagnosis; Choledochal cysts; Choledochal malformation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28318597     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  5 in total

1.  Choledochal malformation: terminology and aetiology.

Authors:  Filippo Parolini; Mark Davenport
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Short-term and long-term outcomes after Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy versus hepaticoduodenostomy following laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst in children.

Authors:  Fanny Yeung; Adrian C H Fung; Patrick H Y Chung; Kenneth K Y Wong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Type C Pancreaticobiliary Maljunction Is Associated With Perforated Choledochal Cyst in Children.

Authors:  Linlin Zhu; Jing Xiong; Zhibao Lv; Jiangbin Liu; Xiong Huang; Weijue Xu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.418

4.  Choledochal malformations in adults in the Netherlands: Results from a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ruben H de Kleine; A Marthe Schreuder; Anneke Ten Hove; Jan B F Hulscher; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Cornelis H C Dejong; Jeroen de Jonge; Philip de Reuver; Joris Erdmann; Geert Kazemier; Thomas M van Gulik; Annette S H Gouw; Robert J Porte
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.828

5.  Laparoscopic definitive surgery for choledochal cyst is performed safely and effectively in infants.

Authors:  Takahisa Tainaka; Chiyoe Shirota; Wataru Sumida; Kazuki Yokota; Satoshi Makita; Hizuru Amano; Masamune Okamoto; Aitaro Takimoto; Yoko Kano; Akihiro Yasui; Yoichi Nakagawa; Akinari Hinoki; Hiroo Uchida
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.018

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.