Literature DB >> 28317917

A Stronger Multi-observable Uncertainty Relation.

Qiu-Cheng Song1, Jun-Li Li1,2, Guang-Xiong Peng1, Cong-Feng Qiao1,2,3.   

Abstract

Uncertainty relation lies at the heart of quantum mechanics, characterizing the incompatibility of non-commuting observables in the preparation of quantum states. An important question is how to improve the lower bound of uncertainty relation. Here we present a variance-based sum uncertainty relation for N incompatible observables stronger than the simple generalization of an existing uncertainty relation for two observables. Further comparisons of our uncertainty relation with other related ones for spin- and spin-1 particles indicate that the obtained uncertainty relation gives a better lower bound.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28317917      PMCID: PMC5357915          DOI: 10.1038/srep44764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Uncertainty relation is one of the fundamental building blocks of quantum theory, and now plays an important role in quantum mechanics and quantum information1234. It is introduced by Heisenberg5 in understanding how precisely the simultaneous values of conjugate observables could be in microspace, i.e., the position X and momentum P of an electron. Kennard6 and Weyl7 proved the uncertainty relation where the standard deviation of an operator X is defined by . Later, Robertson proposed the well-known formula of uncertainty relation8 which is applicable to arbitrary incompatible observables, and the commutator is defined by [A, B] = AB − BA. The uncertainty relation was further strengthed by Schrödinger9 with the following form Here the commutator defined as {A, B} ≡ AB + BA. It is realized that the traditional uncertainty relations may not fully capture the concept of incompatible observables as the lower bound could be trivially zero while the variances are not. An important question in uncertainty relation is how to improve the lower bound and immune from triviality problem1011. Various attempts have been made to find stronger uncertainty relations. One typical kind of relation is that of Maccone and Pati, who derived two stronger uncertainty relations where 〈ψ|ψ⊥〉 = 0, , and the sign on the right-hand side of the inequality takes + (−) while i〈[A, B]〉 is positive (negative). The basic idea behind these two relations is adding additional terms to improve the lower bound. Along this line, more terms121314 and weighted form of different terms1516 have been put into the uncertainty relations. It is worth mentioning that state-independent uncertainty relations can immune from triviality problem17181920. Recent experiments have also been performed to verify the various uncertainty relations21222324. Besides the conjugate observables of position and momentum, multiple observables also exist, e.g., three component vectors of spin and angular momentum. Hence, it is important to find uncertainty relation for multiple incompatible observables. Recently, some three observables uncertainty relations were studied, such as Heisenberg uncertainty relation for three canonical observables25, uncertainty relations for three angular momentum components26, uncertainty relation for three arbitrary observables14. Furthermore, some multiple observables uncertainty relations were proposed, which include multi-observable uncertainty relation in product2728 and sum2930 form of variances. It is worth noting that Chen and Fei derived an variance-based uncertainty relation30 for arbitrary N incompatible observables, which is stronger than the one such as derived from the uncertainty inequality for two observables10. In this paper, we investigate variance-based uncertainty relation for multiple incompatible observables. We present a new variance-based sum uncertainty relation for multiple incompatible observables, which is stronger than an uncertainty relation from summing over all the inequalities for pairs of observables10. Furthermore, we compare the uncertainty relation with existing ones for a spin- and spin-1 particle, which shows our uncertainty relation can give a tighter bound than other ones.

Results

Theorem 1. For arbitrary N observables A1, A2, …, AN, the following variance-based uncertainty relation holds The bound becomes nontrivial as long as the state is not common eigenstate of all the N observables. Proof: To derive (7), start from the equality then using the inequality we obtain the uncertainty relation (7) QED. When N = 2 we have the following corollary Corollary 1.1. For two incompatible observables A and B, we have which is derived from Theorem 1 for N = 2, and stronger than uncertainty relation (5). To show that our relation (7) has a stronger bound, we consider the result in ref. 10, the relation (5) is derived from the uncertainty equality Using the above uncertainty equality, one can obtain two inequalities for arbitrary N observables, namely and The bound in (6) is tighter than the one in (12)30. However, the lower bound in (6) is not always tighter than the one in (13) (see Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Example of comparison between our relation (7) and the ones (6), (12), (13).

The upper line is the sum of the variances (SV) . The black line is the lower bound (LB) given by our relation (7). The solid green line is the bound (6) (FB). The dashed green line is the bound (12) (PB1). The blue line is the bound (13) (PB2).

Example 1. To give an overview that the relation (7) has a better lower bound than the relations (6), (12), (13), we consider a family of qubit pure states given by the Bloch vector , and choose the Pauli matrices Then we have (Δσ)2 + (Δσ)2 + (Δσ)2 = 2, , and . Similarly, [Δ(σ − σ)]2 = 2, and . The comparison between the lower bounds (6), (12), (13) and (7) is given in Fig. 1. Apparently, our bound is tighter than (6), (12) and (13). We shall show with detailed proofs and examples that our uncertainty relation (7) has better lower bound than that of (6), (12), (13) in the following sections.

Comparison between the lower bound of our uncertainty relation (7) with that of inequality (12)

First, we compare our relation (7) with the one (12). Note that , the relation (12) becomes Simplify the above inequality, we obtain which is equal to the relation (12). Similarly, by using , our relation (7) becomes Simplify the above inequality, we get which is equal to the relation (7). It is easy to see that the right-hand side of (17) is greater than the right-hand side of (15). Hence, the relation (7) is stronger than the relation (12).

Comparison between the lower bound of our uncertainty relation (7) with that of inequalities (6) and (13)

Here, we will show the uncertainty relation (7) is stronger than inequalities (13) and (6) for a spin- particle and measurement of Pauli-spin operators σ, σ, σ. Then the uncertainty relation (7) has the form the relation (13) is given by and the relation (6) says that We consider a qubit state and its Bloch sphere representation where are Pauli matrices and the Bloch vector is real three-dimensional vector such that . Then we have , . The relation (18) has the form where we define . And the relation (19) becomes Let us compare the lower bound of (22) with that of (23). The difference of these two bounds is for all . When , the above inequality becomes equality, then the Eq. (24) has the minimum value . This illustrates that the uncertainty relation (7) is stronger that the one (13) for a spin- particle and measurement of Pauli-spin operators σ, σ, σ. Let us compare the uncertainty relation (18) with (20). The relation (20) has the form where we define . Then the difference of these two bounds of relation (22) and (25) becomes where we have twice used Cauchy’s inequality. When and , the above inequality becomes equality, then the Eq. (26) has the minimum value . This illustrates that the uncertainty relation (7) is stronger that the one (6) for a spin- particle and measurement of Pauli-spin operators σ, σ, σ. Example 2. For spin-1 systems, we consider the following quantum state characterized by θ and ϕ with 0 ≤ θ ≤ π, 0 ≤ ϕ ≤ 2π. By choosing the three angular momentum operators () the comparison between the lower bounds (6), (12), (13) and (7) is shown by Fig. 2. The results suggest that the relation (7) can give tighter bounds than other ones (6), (12), (13) for a spin-1 particle and measurement of angular momentum operators , , .
Figure 2

Example of comparison between our relation (7) and ones (6), (12), (13).

We choose , and three components of the angular momentum for spin-1 particle, and a family of states parametrized by θ and ϕ as . (A) For ϕ = π/4, the comparison between our relation (7) and ones (6), (12), (13). The upper line is the sum of the variances (SV) . The black line is the lower bound (LB) given by our relation (7). The solid green line is the bound (6) (FB). The dashed green line is the bound (12) (PB1). The blue line is the bound (13) (PB2). (B) The comparison between our relation (7) and (6), which shows that our relation (7) (LB) has stronger bound than (6) (FB). (C) The comparison between our relation (7) and (13), which shows that our relation (7) (LB) has stronger bound than (13) (PB2). (D) The lower bound of the relation (6) minus the lower bound of the relation (13).

Conclusion

We have provided a variance-based sum uncertainty relation for N incompatible observables, which is stronger than the simple generalizations of the uncertainty relation for two observables derived by Maccone and Pati [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 260401 (2014)]. Furthermore, our uncertainty relation gives a tighter bound than the others by comparison for a spin- particle with the measurements of spin observables σ, σ, σ. And also, in the case of spin-1 with measurement of angular momentum operators L, L, L, our uncertainty relation predicts a tighter bound than other ones.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Song, Q.-C. et al. A Stronger Multi-observable Uncertainty Relation. Sci. Rep. 7, 44764; doi: 10.1038/srep44764 (2017). Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  10 in total

1.  Characterizing entanglement via uncertainty relations.

Authors:  Otfried Gühne
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Quantum-state disturbance versus information gain: Uncertainty relations for quantum information.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.140

3.  Stronger uncertainty relations for all incompatible observables.

Authors:  Lorenzo Maccone; Arun K Pati
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Experimental Test of Heisenberg's Measurement Uncertainty Relation Based on Statistical Distances.

Authors:  Wenchao Ma; Zhihao Ma; Hengyan Wang; Zhihua Chen; Ying Liu; Fei Kong; Zhaokai Li; Xinhua Peng; Mingjun Shi; Fazhan Shi; Shao-Ming Fei; Jiangfeng Du
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Sum uncertainty relations for arbitrary N incompatible observables.

Authors:  Bin Chen; Shao-Ming Fei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Weighted Uncertainty Relations.

Authors:  Yunlong Xiao; Naihuan Jing; Xianqing Li-Jost; Shao-Ming Fei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Multi-observable Uncertainty Relations in Product Form of Variances.

Authors:  Hui-Hui Qin; Shao-Ming Fei; Xianqing Li-Jost
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Mutually Exclusive Uncertainty Relations.

Authors:  Yunlong Xiao; Naihuan Jing
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Reformulating the Quantum Uncertainty Relation.

Authors:  Jun-Li Li; Cong-Feng Qiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Experimental violation and reformulation of the Heisenberg's error-disturbance uncertainty relation.

Authors:  So-Young Baek; Fumihiro Kaneda; Masanao Ozawa; Keiichi Edamatsu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Tight N-observable uncertainty relations and their experimental demonstrations.

Authors:  Zhi-Xin Chen; Hui Wang; Jun-Li Li; Qiu-Cheng Song; Cong-Feng Qiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  The tripartite quantum-memory-assisted entropic uncertainty relation and upper bound on shareability of quantum discord.

Authors:  Hazhir Dolatkhah; Abolhassan Mohammadi; Soroush Haseli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Multipartite uncertainty relation with quantum memory.

Authors:  Saeed Haddadi; Mohammad Reza Pourkarimi; Soroush Haseli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.