Literature DB >> 28317207

Hidden high rate of pre-eclampsia in twin compared with singleton pregnancy.

C Francisco1, D Wright2, Z Benkő1, A Syngelaki1, K H Nicolaides1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the gestational age at delivery in dichorionic (DC) and monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies, with and without pre-eclampsia (PE), and to determine the relative risk of total and preterm PE compared with that in singleton pregnancies.
METHODS: This was a screening study for PE in twin pregnancies undergoing first-trimester combined screening for aneuploidy and subsequently delivering two phenotypically normal live or stillborn babies at ≥ 24 weeks' gestation. The distribution of gestational age at delivery in DC and MC twins was determined and compared with that in singleton pregnancies from the same population. The relative risk for total and preterm PE in twins compared with singleton pregnancies was determined. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative incidence of PE in twin and singleton pregnancies, assuming no other cause for delivery, were determined and hazard ratios for twins relative to singletons were obtained from a Cox proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: The incidence of PE in singletons was 2.3% (2162/93 297), in DC twin pregnancies was 8.1% (145/1789) and in MC twin pregnancies was 6.0% (26/430). Compared with singletons, the relative risk of total PE was 3.5 for DC twins and 2.6 for MC twins. Delivery < 37 weeks' gestation occurred in 5.5% of singletons, 46.5% of DC twins and 91.4% of MC twins. The incidence of preterm PE was 0.6%, 5.5% and 5.8% for singletons, DC twins and MC twins, respectively. Compared with singletons, the relative risk of preterm PE was 8.7 for DC twins and 9.1 for MC twins. In the Cox proportional hazards regression model, the hazard ratios for DC and MC twin pregnancies relative to singleton pregnancies were 14 and 23, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The relative risk of preterm PE in DC and MC twins is similar and substantially higher than in singleton pregnancies. In ongoing twin pregnancies, the high relative risk of PE may merit a higher intensity of monitoring than is routine for singleton pregnancies.
© 2017 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. © 2017 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  first-trimester screening; pre-eclampsia; pyramid of pregnancy care; twin pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28317207     DOI: 10.1002/uog.17470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  14 in total

1.  A Triple Obstetric Challenge of Thoracopagus-Type Conjoined Twins, Eclampsia, and Obstructed Labor: A Case Report from Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Mariatu Binta Leigh; Valerie John-Cole; Mike Kamara; Alimamy Philip Koroma; Michael Momoh Koroma; Edward Ejiro Emuveyan; Peter Bramlage; Ivo Buschmann
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-12-05

2.  Early Detection of Preeclampsia Using Circulating Small non-coding RNA.

Authors:  Liron Yoffe; Avital Gilam; Orly Yaron; Avital Polsky; Luba Farberov; Argyro Syngelaki; Kypros Nicolaides; Moshe Hod; Noam Shomron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Prevalence and risk of pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension in twin pregnancies: a population-based register study.

Authors:  Katariina Laine; Gulim Murzakanova; Kristina Baker Sole; Aase Devold Pay; Siri Heradstveit; Sari Räisänen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Is female genital mutilation associated with eclampsia? Evidence from a nationally representative survey data.

Authors:  Saverio Bellizzi; Lale Say; Arash Rashidian; Michel Boulvain; Jasmine Abdulcadir
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Sexual violence and eclampsia: analysis of data from Demographic and Health Surveys from seven low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Saverio Bellizzi; Alessandra Nivoli; Paola Salaris; Anna Rita Ronzoni; Giuseppe Pichierri; Francesca Palestra; Ola Wazwaz; Miguel Angel Luque-Fernandez
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.413

6.  Clinical risk factors for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Nipp Chantanahom; Vorapong Phupong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Determinants of adverse birth outcome in Sub-Saharan Africa: analysis of recent demographic and health surveys.

Authors:  Koku Sisay Tamirat; Malede Mequanent Sisay; Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema; Zemenu Tadesse Tessema
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  A Review of Research Progress of Pregnancy with Twins with Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Na Wu; Haitao Shen
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-05-18

9.  Establishment and assessment of a nomogram for predicting adverse outcomes of preterm preeclampsia.

Authors:  Rongxin Chen; Qing Han; Lianghui Zheng; Lingling Jiang; Jianying Yan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Excessive Neutrophil Activity in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Could It Contribute to the Development of Preeclampsia?

Authors:  Lenka Vokalova; Shane V van Breda; Xi Lun Ye; Evelyn A Huhn; Nandor G Than; Paul Hasler; Olav Lapaire; Irene Hoesli; Simona W Rossi; Sinuhe Hahn
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.