Literature DB >> 28317120

The efficacy of teachers' responses to incidents of bullying and victimization: The mediational role of moral disengagement for bullying.

Kristel Campaert1, Annalaura Nocentini1, Ersilia Menesini1.   

Abstract

Teachers respond differently to bullying and victimization. Socio-cognitive and moral domain theory suggest that students process teachers' behavior cognitively and that teachers' responses to incidents of bullying and victimization could affect students' level of moral disengagement. We examined the mediating effect of students' moral disengagement between types of teachers' responses to situations of bullying and victimization and individual bullying using multilevel mediation modelling. Participants were 609 students (50% boys, age M = 11.47, SD = 1.14) of central Italy, nested in 34 classes. Students rated the frequency of self-reported bullying and of teachers' responses to incidents of bullying and victimization on a 5-point Likert scale. Teachers' responses to bullying included non-intervention, mediation, group discussion, and sanctions. Teachers' responses to victimization included non-intervention, mediation, group discussion, and victim support. Results indicated that in the teachers' responses to incidents of bullying model, a significant indirect effect of non-intervention (β = .03; 95%CI [.01, .05]) and of sanctions (β = -.02; 95%CI [-.04, -.01]) on bullying through moral disengagement was found at the individual level. Similarly, in the model on teachers' responses toward victims there was a significant indirect effect through moral disengagement of non-intervention (β = .03; 95%CI [.02, .04]) and victim support (β = -.01; 95%CI [-.02, -.001]). At the class level there were no significant indirect effects. In sum, results indicated that moral disengagement is an important mediator at the individual level and suggest including teachers in anti-bullying interventions with a specific focus on their role for moral development.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bullying; moral disengagement; multilevel mediation; teachers’ response; victimization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28317120     DOI: 10.1002/ab.21706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aggress Behav        ISSN: 0096-140X            Impact factor:   2.917


  6 in total

1.  The Role of Bullying-Related Policies: Understanding How School Staff Respond to Bullying Situations.

Authors:  Tracy Evian Waasdorp; Rui Fu; Ann L Perepezko; Catherine P Bradshaw
Journal:  Eur J Dev Psychol       Date:  2021-02-25

2.  Teachers Can Make a Difference in Bullying: Effects of Teacher Interventions on Students' Adoption of Bully, Victim, Bully-Victim or Defender Roles across Time.

Authors:  Christoph Burger; Dagmar Strohmeier; Lenka Kollerová
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2022-09-02

3.  Preservice Preschool Teachers' Responses to Bullying Scenarios: The Roles of Years of Study and Empathy.

Authors:  Heqing Huang; Yanchun Liu; Yulu Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-02-20

4.  Individual and Classroom Social-Cognitive Processes in Bullying: A Short-Term Longitudinal Multilevel Study.

Authors:  Robert Thornberg; Linda Wänström; Shelley Hymel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-07-31

5.  Teachers' Responses to Bullying Questionnaire: A Validation Study in Two Educational Contexts.

Authors:  Fleur Elisabeth van Gils; Hilde Colpin; Karine Verschueren; Karlien Demol; Isabel Maria Ten Bokkel; Ersilia Menesini; Benedetta Emanuela Palladino
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-09

6.  Bystanders of ethnic victimization: Do classroom context and teachers' approach matter for how adolescents intend to act?

Authors:  Sevgi Bayram Özdemir; Takuya Yanagida; Metin Özdemir
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2022-07-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.