Literature DB >> 28317027

The Type a and Type b Polysaccharide Capsules Predominate in an International Collection of Invasive Kingella kingae Isolates.

Eric A Porsch1, Kimberly F Starr2, Pablo Yagupsky3, Joseph W St Geme4.   

Abstract

Kingella kingae is an encapsulated Gram-negative bacterium and an important etiology of osteoarticular infections in young children. A recent study examining a diverse collection of carrier and invasive K. kingae isolates from Israel revealed four distinct polysaccharide capsule types. In this study, to obtain a global view of K. kingae capsule type diversity, we examined an international collection of isolates using a multiplex PCR approach. The collection contained all four previously identified capsule types and no new capsule types. Over 95% of invasive isolates in the collection were type a or type b, similar to the findings in Israel. These results suggest that the type a and type b polysaccharide capsules may have enhanced pathogenic properties or may mark clonal groups of strains with specific virulence genes. In addition, they raise the possibility that a vaccine containing the type a and type b capsules might be an effective approach to preventing K. kingae disease. IMPORTANCEKingella kingae has emerged as a significant cause of septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, and bacteremia in young children. A recent study examining a diverse collection of K. kingae isolates from Israel revealed four different polysaccharide capsule types in this species, designated types a to d. To determine the global distribution of K. kingae capsule types, we assembled and capsule typed an international collection of K. kingae isolates. The findings reported here show that the type a and type b capsules represent >95% of the invasive isolates, similar to the Israeli isolate collection, suggesting that a polysaccharide-based vaccine targeting these two capsules could be an attractive approach to prevent K. kingae disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kingella kingae; PCR; capsule typing; clinical isolates; polysaccharide capsule

Year:  2017        PMID: 28317027      PMCID: PMC5352833          DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00060-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  mSphere        ISSN: 2379-5042            Impact factor:   4.389


OBSERVATION

The use of improved culture techniques and PCR-based diagnostics in recent years has revealed that the Gram-negative bacterium Kingella kingae is a significant etiology of osteoarticular infections in children 6 to 48 months of age in countries where these sensitive detection methods are routinely employed (1). K. kingae is a normal component of the upper respiratory tract flora in young children and is present in the posterior pharynx in approximately 10% of healthy children 6 to 48 months of age at any given point in time (2–5). This organism is readily transmitted from person to person by close contact among young children, and longitudinal studies have estimated that children have an approximately 70% chance of being colonized with K. kingae during the first 2 years of life (3, 6). In most individuals, colonization with K. kingae persists for weeks to months and is then cleared (3, 6). On occasion, the organism is able to breach the respiratory epithelial barrier, enter the bloodstream, and disseminate to distant sites, causing invasive disease. Analysis of the K. kingae population structure suggests that only some K. kingae strains are able to cause invasive disease (7). The primary clinical presentations of K. kingae disease include septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, spondylodiscitis, tenosynovitis, bacteremia without a focus, and endocarditis (8). The annual incidence of culture-proven disease among children younger than 5 years of age in Israel is 9.4 per 100,000. However, given the difficulty in cultivating K. kingae, this figure represents a minimal estimate (9). Recognizing that the use of species-specific nucleic acid amplification improves the detection of K. kingae by 500% compared to its detection by culture, the true incidence of K. kingae invasive disease in the Israeli population is likely comparable to the incidence of invasive Haemophilus influenzae type b disease before the introduction of H. influenzae type b conjugate vaccines (Hib conjugate vaccines) (i.e., >50 per 100,000) (10). The incidence of K. kingae invasive disease in other countries has not been defined but appears to be high in parts of Europe and a number of other countries around the world. Recent studies have shown that isolates of K. kingae elaborate a polysaccharide capsule (11–13). Interestingly, elimination of encapsulation results in attenuated virulence in an infant rat model of invasive disease (14), suggesting that the capsule is an important virulence factor. Although the specific mechanism by which the capsule facilitates invasive disease has not been defined, the polysaccharide capsules of other pathogenic organisms prevent phagocytosis and block complement-mediated serum killing, promoting bacterial survival in the host. Given this information and the widespread success of polysaccharide conjugate vaccines in reducing morbidity and mortality due to a variety of encapsulated pathogenic bacteria, we recently defined the polysaccharide capsule repertoire in a diverse set of >400 Israeli K. kingae isolates (13). We found that four distinct polysaccharide capsule structures (capsule types a, b, c, and d) were present in this collection and that >95% of invasive disease isolates expressed the type a or type b capsule. Furthermore, we identified the csa, csb, csc, and csd capsule synthesis loci that are necessary for the expression of the type a, type b, type c, and type d capsules, respectively. To gain a broader view of capsule type diversity in the global K. kingae population, in this study, we assembled an international collection of K. kingae isolates and determined the capsule type of each isolate using a multiplex PCR approach. We found that the same four capsule types identified in the Israeli isolate collection were present in the international collection and that no new capsule types were present. In addition, we established that over 95% of invasive isolates expressed the type a or type b capsule. In a previous study, we developed a K. kingae capsule type PCR screening approach that relied on the use of five separate reactions: reactions specific to each of the four capsule types and a reaction that used primers flanking the capsule synthesis locus (13). To streamline the K. kingae capsule-typing process, in this work, we developed a single multiplex PCR approach for one-step identification of the capsule type. The reaction mixture contains four sets of primer pairs specific to each of the four capsule synthesis loci, designed to each produce a different size amplicon. As shown by the results in Fig. 1, the multiplex PCR produces an ~2,000-bp amplicon for the csa locus (encoding the synthesis gene for the type a capsule), an ~1,500-bp amplicon for the csb locus (encoding the synthesis genes for the type b capsule), an ~1,000-bp amplicon for the csc locus (encoding the synthesis genes for the type c capsule), and an ~500-bp amplicon for the csd locus (encoding the synthesis genes for the type d capsule).
FIG 1 

International K. kingae isolates are represented by four capsule types. (A) A representative agarose gel of the multiplex capsule-typing PCR approach is shown. The type a amplicon is ~2,000 bp (lane 1), the type b amplicon is ~1,500 bp (lane 2), the type c amplicon is ~1,000 bp (lane 3), and the type d amplicon is ~500 bp (lane 4). The genomic DNA PCR template sources are as follows: lane 1, KK01 (type a control); lane 2, KK58 (type b control); lane 3, KK60 (type c control); lane 4, BB270 (type d control); lane 5, DNA ladder; lane 6, 16RZ2819K (type a); lane 7, 16SB9163M (type a); lane 8, ATCC 23330 (type c); lane 9, ATCC 23331 (type a); lane 10, ATCC 23332 (type a); lane 11, SW353 (type b); lane 12, SW628 (type b); lane 13, SW268 (type a); lane 14, AUS 01 (type b); lane 15, KK194 (type d).

International K. kingae isolates are represented by four capsule types. (A) A representative agarose gel of the multiplex capsule-typing PCR approach is shown. The type a amplicon is ~2,000 bp (lane 1), the type b amplicon is ~1,500 bp (lane 2), the type c amplicon is ~1,000 bp (lane 3), and the type d amplicon is ~500 bp (lane 4). The genomic DNA PCR template sources are as follows: lane 1, KK01 (type a control); lane 2, KK58 (type b control); lane 3, KK60 (type c control); lane 4, BB270 (type d control); lane 5, DNA ladder; lane 6, 16RZ2819K (type a); lane 7, 16SB9163M (type a); lane 8, ATCC 23330 (type c); lane 9, ATCC 23331 (type a); lane 10, ATCC 23332 (type a); lane 11, SW353 (type b); lane 12, SW628 (type b); lane 13, SW268 (type a); lane 14, AUS 01 (type b); lane 15, KK194 (type d). To investigate global capsule type diversity in K. kingae, we assembled an international strain collection consisting of 150 isolates (Table 1). Genomic DNA was recovered from each isolate and was used as the template in the multiplex PCR assay. We hypothesized that any isolate that failed to produce a capsule locus-specific amplicon could potentially contain a novel capsule synthesis locus or could be a nonencapsulated strain. In total, 89 isolates were capsule type a (59.3%), 49 isolates were type b (32.7%), 8 isolates were type c (5.3%), 3 isolates were type d (2.0%), and 1 isolate (0.7%) yielded no PCR product. Further examination of the isolate that yielded no PCR product revealed that it was nonencapsulated, as assessed by alcian blue staining of surface extracts and inspection of colony morphology (Fig. 2). Using PCR primers that flank the capsule synthesis locus, a 2.5-kb product was amplified from this isolate. Sequencing of this product revealed a truncated csa locus (data not shown). Accordingly, for the purposes of this study, this isolate was considered capsule type a.
TABLE 1 

International isolate collection used in this study

IsolateLocationYearSyndromeaCapsule type
CA7Catalonia, Spain1997OAa
CA20Catalonia, Spain1998OAa
CA40Catalonia, Spain2000OAb
CA48Catalonia, Spain2001OAb
CA49Catalonia, Spain2001OAb
CA55Catalonia, Spain2001OAc
CA57Catalonia, Spain2002OAa
CA61Catalonia, Spain2003OAa
CA63Catalonia, Spain2004Ba
CA64Catalonia, Spain2004Ba
CA65Catalonia, Spain2004Bb
CA66Catalonia, Spain2004OAa
CA67Catalonia, Spain2004Bb
CA68Catalonia, Spain2004OAa
CA73Catalonia, Spain2006OAb
CA75Catalonia, Spain2006Bb
CA77Catalonia, Spain2006OAa
CA78Catalonia, Spain2006OAa
CA83Catalonia, Spain2007OAa
CA84Catalonia, Spain2007OAa
CA85Catalonia, Spain2007OAb
CA88Catalonia, Spain2008OAa
CA94Catalonia, Spain2008OAa
CA95Catalonia, Spain2008OAa
CA99Catalonia, Spain2009OAb
CA105Catalonia, Spain2009Ba
CA112Catalonia, Spain2009OAa
CA151Catalonia, Spain2009OAb
CA179Catalonia, Spain2010OAa
CA120Catalonia, Spain2010Ba
CA122Catalonia, Spain2010OAb
CA129Catalonia, Spain2011OAa
CA131Catalonia, Spain2011OAc
CA138Catalonia, Spain2012OAa
CA139Catalonia, Spain2012Cd
CA181Catalonia, Spain2014OAb
CA183Catalonia, Spain2014Ca
CA189Catalonia, Spain2014OAa
CA197Catalonia, Spain2014OAa
CA198Catalonia, Spain2014OAb
CA199Catalonia, Spain2014OAb
CA202Catalonia, Spain2015OAa
CA203Catalonia, Spain2015OAb
CA216Catalonia, Spain2016Ba
CA217Catalonia, Spain2016OAb
CIP 73.01Besançon, France1972Ba
CIP 101722Grenoble, France1985Ba
CIP 102473Paris, France1986OAb
SCH 25972Paris, France2007OAb
BIA 29991Paris, France2009OAa
SAN 6539Bordeaux, France2009OAb
LEP 6724Bordeaux, France2009UNbb
BOU 30672Paris, France2010OAa
N10-6602Nantes, France2010OAa
N10-6318Nantes, France2010OAa
HER 31223Paris, France2010OAa
N10-10770Nantes, France2010Bd
GRO 7183Bordeaux, France2010OAa
N10-10419Nantes, France2010ECb
ETI 126580Paris, France2011OAa
HAM 137138Paris, France2011OAb
SAI 11985Paris, France2011OAa
POH 14284Paris, France2011OAa
MAR 1853Paris, France2011OAa
STF 4AParis, France2011Ca
DER 112012–1Paris, France2012OAa
NICE 476Nice, France2012OAb
DOR 8225Bordeaux, France2012UNa
CAT30640171-SParis, France2013OAb
COU 1310053120Sables d’Olonnes, France2013ECa
FOF 3022006-SParis, France2013OAb
DAG 31560001-SParis, France2013OAa
ZEH 30720143-SParis, France2013OAa
BRU32800001LAParis, France2013OAa
KWG-1Paris, France2013OAa
AUD31930140-SParis, France2013OAa
BON 36648-laParis, France2013OAb
ZUL 30220039-SParis, France2013Cb
CRA 32950107-SParis, France2013UNa
AGO 30220109-SParis, France2013OAa
M2003000170Minnesota, USA2003Ca
C2003003154Minnesota, USA2003OAa
M2004000037Minnesota, USA2004Cb
C2005003818Minnesota, USA2005Ba
C2005004024Minnesota, USA2005Ba
C2005004457Minnesota, USA2005OAb
C2005004524Minnesota, USA2005OAb
C2006001196Minnesota, USA2006OAb
C2006001744Minnesota, USA2006OAa
C2006003006Minnesota, USA2006Ba
C2007000490Minnesota, USA2007OAb
Duke 137North Carolina, USA2007ECa
C2009000170Minnesota, USA2009Bb
C2009033016Minnesota, USA2009OAa
C2012000896Minnesota, USA2012OAa
13040Pennsylvania, USA2016OAa
97–982Missouri, USAUNOAa
SLCH 05-001-1817Missouri, USAUNOAa
SLCH 002Missouri, USAUNOAb
PP1New York, USAUNOAa
VTK:500285USAUNUNc
VTK:500287USAUNUNc
VTK:501585USAUNUNa
VTK:501586USAUNUNc
VTK:500615USAUNUNa
VTK:501628USAUNUNa
VTK:501629USAUNUNa
VTK:501804USAUNUNa
CAN1Montreal, Canada2003OAa
CAN2Montreal, Canada2005OAa
CAN3Montreal, Canada2005OAa
CAN7Montreal, Canada2006OAb
CAN8cMontreal, Canada2007OAa
CAN9Montreal, Canada2007OAa
CAN13Montreal, Canada2009OAb
CAN16Montreal, Canada2010OAb
CAN21Montreal, Canada2012OAb
CAN22Montreal, Canada2012Bb
CAN24Montreal, Canada2013OAa
CAN25Montreal, Canada2013OAa
9508+31135Reykjavíc, Iceland1995OAb
9911+17199Reykjavíc, Iceland1999OAa
0111+28183Reykjavíc, Iceland2001OAb
0211+12480Reykjavíc, Iceland2002OAb
0303+28260Reykjavíc, Iceland2003OAb
0309+30201Reykjavíc, Iceland2003OAc
0405+30002Reykjavíc, Iceland2004OAb
0410+23083Reykjavíc, Iceland2004Ba
0601+26281Reykjavíc, Iceland2006OAa
0604+12258Reykjavíc, Iceland2006OAb
S0910230213Reykjavíc, Iceland2009OAb
S1010080184Reykjavíc, Iceland2010OAc
09WG5552PChristchurch, New Zealand2009Ba
09WT1836FChristchurch, New Zealand2009Ba
11DC5983HChristchurch, New Zealand2011Ba
15JS24141RChristchurch, New Zealand2015Ba
15RB7013LChristchurch, New Zealand2015OAa
15RJ0022GChristchurch, New Zealand2015OAa
15R43594MChristchurch, New Zealand2015Ca
16RZ0774EChristchurch, New Zealand2016Ca
16RZ2819KChristchurch, New Zealand2016Ca
16SB9163MChristchurch, New Zealand2016Ca
ATCC 23330Norway1960sCc
ATCC 23331Norway1960sBa
ATCC 23332Norway1960sBa
SW353Switzerland2013Cb
SW628Switzerland2014OAb
SW268Switzerland2015OAa
AUS 01Geelong, Australia2013ECb
KK194St. Petersburg, Russia2003Cd

B, bacteremia; C, carriage; EC, endocarditis; OA, osteoarticular.

UN, unknown.

Isolate CAN8 is nonencapsulated due to a truncated csaA gene but was included as a type a isolate for the purposes of this analysis.

FIG 2 

Isolate CAN8 is nonencapsulated. Mild-acid surface extracts from capsule type a strain KK01 (lane 1), type b strain KK58 (lane 2), type c strain KK60 (lane 3), type d strain BB270 (lane 4), and isolate CAN8 (lane 5) were analyzed following SDS-PAGE and alcian blue staining. The lack of alcian blue-stained material in the extract of CAN8 confirms that this isolate is nonencapsulated.

International isolate collection used in this study B, bacteremia; C, carriage; EC, endocarditis; OA, osteoarticular. UN, unknown. Isolate CAN8 is nonencapsulated due to a truncated csaA gene but was included as a type a isolate for the purposes of this analysis. Isolate CAN8 is nonencapsulated. Mild-acid surface extracts from capsule type a strain KK01 (lane 1), type b strain KK58 (lane 2), type c strain KK60 (lane 3), type d strain BB270 (lane 4), and isolate CAN8 (lane 5) were analyzed following SDS-PAGE and alcian blue staining. The lack of alcian blue-stained material in the extract of CAN8 confirms that this isolate is nonencapsulated. A detailed summary of the K. kingae capsule-typing results by country and syndrome (invasive isolate, carrier isolate, or unknown) at the time of isolation is shown in Table 2. Among the 126 isolates that were known to be recovered from systemic sites in patients with invasive K. kingae disease (osteoarticular infections, bacteremia, or endocarditis), 76 were type a (60.3%), 45 were type b (35.7%), 4 were type c (3.2%), and 1 was type d (0.8%), similar to the breakdown among invasive isolates in Israel (13). Of the 13 carrier isolates from oropharyngeal swabs, 7 were type a (53.8%), 3 were type b (23.1%), 1 was type c (7.7%), and 2 were type d (15.4%). While the small number of carrier isolates precludes any meaningful analysis of capsule type distribution, the relative representation of each type was similar to the distribution in the previously published Israeli carrier isolate collection (49.0% type a, 19.2% type b, 12.1% type c, and 19.7% type d) (13). With regard to the countries with at least 10 isolates, >80% of isolates were type a or type b, and in all countries except Iceland, the most common capsule type was type a. Interestingly, all 10 of the New Zealand isolates were type a, including the 4 carrier isolates.
TABLE 2 

Summary of capsule-typing results based on country of isolation and associated clinical condition

Country (no. of isolates)No. of isolates from indicated clinical condition with indicated capsule type
Invasive
Carrier
Unknown
Total no.abcdTotal no.abcdTotal no.abcd
Spain (45)4325162211
France (36)302091211321
USA (28)18126211853
Canada (12)127a5
Iceland (12)12372
New Zealand (10)6644
Norway (3)2211
Switzerland (3)21111
Australia (1)11
Russia (1)11
Total (150)12676454113731211713

Isolate CAN8 is nonencapsulated due to a truncated csaA gene but was included as a type a isolate for the purposes of this analysis.

Summary of capsule-typing results based on country of isolation and associated clinical condition Isolate CAN8 is nonencapsulated due to a truncated csaA gene but was included as a type a isolate for the purposes of this analysis. The four previously identified K. kingae capsule types that were originally characterized in a diverse collection of Israeli isolates were also identified in the international collection of isolates presented here. No new capsule types were identified in this international collection, confirming the limited capsular repertoire of K. kingae compared to those of other pathogens that reside in the respiratory tract, such as Neisseria meningitidis (13 capsule types) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (over 90 capsule types). The study has the limitation that carrier isolates were poorly represented, reflecting the lack of K. kingae colonization studies using culture-based methods outside Israel. As a consequence, we cannot exclude the possibility that other capsule types or nonencapsulated strains exist in the countries examined in this study, keeping in mind the likelihood that some K. kingae strains are able to colonize the oropharynx but are unable to cause invasive disease. In addition, there is little information on the epidemiology of K. kingae disease in developing countries, which may harbor unidentified capsule types. Another limitation of this study is the lack of complete epidemiological data on every isolate. Therefore, the capsule type distribution may be skewed due to the presence of epidemiologically related strains in this collection. Given that the capsule-typing multiplex PCR approach is specific for the four known K. kingae capsule types, we anticipated that new capsule types in this international collection of isolates would be associated with the lack of a PCR amplicon. The only isolate that failed to yield an amplicon in the multiplex PCR was strain CAN8. Using PCR primers that flank the capsule synthesis locus, we were able to amplify a 2.5-kb amplicon from this strain. Nucleotide sequencing of this amplicon revealed a truncated csaA gene with a large, 1,085-bp deletion in the 3′ region, resulting in a nonencapsulated phenotype. Thus, CAN8 is a type a strain that presumably experienced a deletion event and does not have a novel capsule type. In conclusion, we found that 95.1% of the international invasive disease isolates were either capsule type a or b, virtually identical to the 96.0% of Israeli invasive disease isolates that were either type a or type b (13). This finding is similar to the situation with H. influenzae, where isolates expressing the serotype b capsule were responsible for >95% of all invasive H. influenzae disease in the pre-Hib vaccine era, despite the presence of 6 different polysaccharide capsule types (capsule types a to f) (15). It is possible that the K. kingae type a and type b polysaccharide capsules have enhanced pathogenic properties. Alternatively, these capsules may be associated with clonal groups of strains that harbor important virulence genes. Because anticapsular antibody protects against disease caused by organisms such as H. influenzae type b and S. pneumoniae, it is intriguing to speculate that a type a-type b capsular polysaccharide conjugate vaccine might be an effective strategy to prevent disease by K. kingae.

Bacterial strains.

The international K. kingae isolates examined in this study are listed in Table 1. The capsule type a (KK01), capsule type b (KK58), capsule type c (KK60), and capsule type d (BB270) control strains were described previously (13). The K. kingae isolates were grown on chocolate II agar (BD, Sparks, MD) for 17 to 18 h at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. The isolates were stored in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth with 20% glycerol at −80°C.

Capsule typing.

A multiplex PCR strategy was developed to screen for the presence of each of the four unique capsule synthesis loci in a single PCR assay. The primers were designed to produce an ~2,000-bp amplicon for the csa locus (csamultiF, 5′ AGTACAGAACACTTGTTGTTGC 3′, and csamultiR, 5′ AACATTGGCGCAGACAAATTC 3′), an ~1,500-bp amplicon for the csb locus (csbmultiF, 5′ AGATTGGTGGACTTTATATGGTAATTATG 3′, and csbmultiR, 5′ AAATAGAATATTGCGACTGTGCG 3′), an ~1,000-bp amplicon for the csc locus (cscmultiF, 5′ CATTAGCATTGATGCCATTTATGAAC 3′, and cscmultiR, 5′ CGATTGATGACTATTAAACCTTCGG 3′), and an ~500-bp amplicon for the csd locus (csdmultiF, 5′ AAAGGTAAATATCAATTTGCAATTATTTGC 3′, and csdmultiR, 5′ CTTAATAGGACATCATCACCCAAATC 3′). Genomic DNA from the K. kingae isolates was prepared using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI). Each PCR mixture contained 5 μl of 2.0× Taq red Apex master mix (Genesee Scientific, San Diego, CA), 0.5 μl of genomic DNA template, each of the eight primers at a final concentration of 125 nM, and sterile PCR-grade H2O in a total reaction mixture volume of 10 μl. The cycling conditions were as follows: 2 min at 94°C, 30 cycles of 15 s at 94°C, 20 s at 58°C, and 1 min at 72°C, and a final 5-min extension at 72°C. Three microliters of each PCR mixture was analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis, and the capsule type was determined by the size of the amplicon (Fig. 1). The accuracy of this multiplex PCR strategy in determining capsule type was confirmed by comparing the results with the previously published results of the original PCR-based capsule-typing system (13).

Alcian blue staining.

Surface extracts were prepared using Tris-acetate, pH 5.0, separated using SDS-PAGE, and stained with alcian blue as described previously (11).
  14 in total

Review 1.  Kingella kingae: carriage, transmission, and disease.

Authors:  Pablo Yagupsky
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Epidemiological features of invasive Kingella kingae infections and respiratory carriage of the organism.

Authors:  Pablo Yagupsky; Nechama Peled; Orna Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Genotyping of invasive Kingella kingae isolates reveals predominant clones and association with specific clinical syndromes.

Authors:  Uri Amit; Nurith Porat; Romain Basmaci; Philippe Bidet; Stéphane Bonacorsi; Ron Dagan; Pablo Yagupsky
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  The pathogenicity of Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  D C Turk
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Broad-spectrum biofilm inhibition by Kingella kingae exopolysaccharide.

Authors:  Meriem Bendaoud; Evgeny Vinogradov; Nataliya V Balashova; Daniel E Kadouri; Scott C Kachlany; Jeffrey B Kaplan
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Invasive pediatric Kingella kingae Infections: a nationwide collaborative study.

Authors:  Gal Dubnov-Raz; Moshe Ephros; Ben-Zion Garty; Yechiel Schlesinger; Ayala Maayan-Metzger; Joseph Hasson; Imad Kassis; Orna Schwartz-Harari; Pablo Yagupsky
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Specific real-time polymerase chain reaction places Kingella kingae as the most common cause of osteoarticular infections in young children.

Authors:  Sylvia Chometon; Yvonne Benito; Mourad Chaker; Sandrine Boisset; Christine Ploton; Jérôme Bérard; François Vandenesch; Anne Marie Freydiere
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Person-to-person transmission of Kingella kingae among day care center attendees.

Authors:  A Slonim; E S Walker; E Mishori; N Porat; R Dagan; P Yagupsky
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Genetic and Molecular Basis of Kingella kingae Encapsulation.

Authors:  Kimberly F Starr; Eric A Porsch; Patrick C Seed; Joseph W St Geme
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Modulation of Kingella kingae adherence to human epithelial cells by type IV Pili, capsule, and a novel trimeric autotransporter.

Authors:  Eric A Porsch; Thomas E Kehl-Fie; Joseph W St Geme
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 7.867

View more
  8 in total

1.  Distribution of Kingella kingae Capsular Serotypes in France Assessed by a Multiplex PCR Assay on Osteoarticular Samples.

Authors:  Romain Basmaci; Philippe Bidet; Cindy Mallet; Raphaël Vialle; Stéphane Bonacorsi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Kingella kingae: From carriage to infection.

Authors:  Romain Basmaci; Stéphane Bonacorsi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Kingella kingae Virulence Factors and Insights into Pathogenicity.

Authors:  Eric A Porsch
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-05-10

4.  Kingella kingae Surface Polysaccharides Promote Resistance to Human Serum and Virulence in a Juvenile Rat Model.

Authors:  Vanessa L Muñoz; Eric A Porsch; Joseph W St Geme
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 5.  Detection of Respiratory Colonization by Kingella kingae and the Novel Kingella negevensis Species in Children: Uses and Methodology.

Authors:  Pablo Yagupsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Kingella kingae Intrauterine Infection: An Unusual Cause of Chorioamnionitis and Miscarriage in a Patient with Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease.

Authors:  Maria Paola Bonasoni; Andrea Palicelli; Giulia Dalla Dea; Giuseppina Comitini; Giulia Pazzola; Giuseppe Russello; Graziella Bertoldi; Marcellino Bardaro; Claudia Zuelli; Edoardo Carretto
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-04

7.  Kingella kingae Reveals Its Secrets.

Authors:  Pablo Yagupsky
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-06-21

8.  Kingella negevensis shares multiple putative virulence factors with Kingella kingae.

Authors:  Eric A Porsch; Pablo Yagupsky; Joseph W St Geme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.