| Literature DB >> 28316884 |
Fernanda Bribiesca-Contreras1, William I Sellers1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gross dissection is a widespread method for studying animal anatomy, despite being highly destructive and time-consuming. X-ray computed tomography (CT) has been shown to be a non-destructive alternative for studying anatomical structures. However, in the past it has been limited to only being able to visualise mineralised tissues. In recent years, morphologists have started to use traditional X-ray contrast agents to allow the visualisation of soft tissue elements in the CT context. The aim of this project is to assess the ability of contrast-enhanced micro-CT (μCT) to construct a three-dimensional (3D) model of the musculoskeletal system of the bird wing and to quantify muscle geometry and any systematic changes due to shrinkage. We expect that this reconstruction can be used as an anatomical guide to the sparrowhawk wing musculature and form the basis of further biomechanical analysis of flight.Entities:
Keywords: 3D modelling; Birds; Muscle architecture; Staining; Wing
Year: 2017 PMID: 28316884 PMCID: PMC5356476 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Transverse μCT images of a sparrowhawk (A. nisus) wing.
Columns: (A) Control. (B–F) ∼3% (w/v) iodine-buffered formalin solution after three (B), 10 (C), 15 (D), 18 (E), and 25 (F) days. Scale bar equal to 5 mm. Rows: (G) Corresponds to brachial area, (H) antebrachial area and (I) to the avian hand.
Figure 2Difference of contrast in transverse μCT images of A. nisus wing.
Transverse μCT images of A. nisus wing stained in a ∼3% (w/v) iodine-buffered formalin solution for 25 days showing hard and soft tissue elements of the brachial region (A), antebrachial region (B), and hand (C). Red arrow shows an area of low attenuation corresponding to the internal tendon of FCU (6). Scale bar equal to 5 mm. 1, BB; 2, ST; 3, HT; 4, DMA; 5, TPLA; 6, FCU; 7, FDS; 8, PP; 9, FDP; 10, UMV; 11, ELDM; 12, ELA; 13, EDC; 14, ECU; 15, ECTU; 16, EMR; 17, UMD; 18, ISD; 19, ISV; 20, ABDM; 21, ABA; 22, EBA; 23, ADA; 24, HUM; 25, R; 26, U; 27, CMC; 28, fascia; 29, skin. Abbreviations: ABA, abductor alulae; ABDM, abductor digiti majoris; ADA, adductor alulae; BB, biceps brachii; BR, brachialis; CCr, coracobrachialis cranialis; CMC, carpometacarpus; DMA, deltoides major; EBA, extensor brevis alulae; ECTU, ectepicondylo ulnaris; ECU, extensor carpi ulnaris; EDC, extensor digitorum communis; ELA, extensor longus alulae; ELDM, extensor longus digiti majoris; ELDMd, extensor longus digiti majoris pars distalis; EMR, extensor metacarpi radialis; FA, flexor alulae; FCU, flexor carpi ulnaris; FDMI, flexor digiti minoris; FDP, flexor digitorum profundus; FDS, flexor digitorum superficialis; HT, humerotriceps; HUM, humerus; ISD, interosseus dorsalis; ISV, interosseus ventralis; PP, pronator profundus; PS, pronator superficialis; r, radiale; R, radio; ST, scapulotriceps; SU, supinator; TPLA, tensor propatagialis pars longa; U, ulna; u, ulnare; UMD, ulnometacarpalis dorsalis; UMV, ulnometacarpalis ventralis.
Figure 3Three-dimensional model of the wing muscles of a sparrowhawk.
Three-dimensional model of the wing muscles of a sparrowhawk reconstructed from CT images of the stained wing after 25 days in a ∼3% iodine-buffered formalin solution. Dorsal view of superficial (A) and deep (C) muscles and ventral view of superficial (B) and deep (D) muscles. Abbreviations as indicated in Fig. 2.
Figure 4Linear regression plot of wing muscle volumes.
Linear regression plot of the wing muscle volumes of the fresh wing (black lines, solid circles) and scanned wing (grey lines, solid diamonds) against the wing muscle volumes of the 3D model. Solid lines correspond to the regression lines and dashed lines to the 95% prediction intervals. Blue: hand muscles, red: antebrachial muscles, black: brachial muscles.