| Literature DB >> 28316682 |
Z Moradi1, M Far Ajallah Bike Nouri2, M Mohammadi3, F Esfandnia3, P Taovsi3, A Esfandnia3.
Abstract
Introduction: The goal of this research was to assess the stress factors among the elderly living in nursing homes (Eram and Mother) in Kermanshah, in 2015. Research method: This was a descriptive - cross analysis and was performed in the first half of 2015 in a sectional way. The statistical population included 150 elderly men and women aged 60 to 74, and the sample size was selected from 108 people using the Cochran formula. A standard questionnaire was used to collect data from a previously validated survey. Finally, a total of 100 questionnaires were filled in and data were analyzed by using Amos 21 and SPSS 21 software.Entities:
Keywords: assessment; elderly; stress factors
Year: 2015 PMID: 28316682 PMCID: PMC5348947
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Life ISSN: 1844-122X
Mean, variance and the mean scores by applying the Friedman examination
| Dimension | Mean Rank | Mean | Std. Deviation |
| Disappointment | 2.61 | 16.4100 | 4.55958 |
| Seclusion | 4.57 | 20.8500 | 3.12169 |
| Home empty | 2.77 | 16.6600 | 3.59073 |
| Relationship problems | 3.54 | 18.8200 | 5.29604 |
| Physiological problems | 4.26 | 21.0200 | 5.36728 |
| Disability and independence | 3.26 | 17.7200 | 4.54402 |
Relationship between stressor factors and their dimensions
| Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | P | |||
| Disability and independence | <--- | Stressors of aging | .157 | .023 | 6.878 | *** |
| Physiological problems | <--- | Stressors of aging | .168 | .028 | 5.974 | *** |
| Relationship problems | <--- | Stressors of aging | .175 | .027 | 6.474 | *** |
| Home empty | <--- | Stressors of aging | .104 | .019 | 5.422 | *** |
| Seclusion | <--- | Stressors of aging | .112 | .015 | 7.294 | *** |
| Disappointment | <--- | Stressors of aging | .196 | .020 | 9.978 | *** |
| ***Indicates the importance of the relationship at the level of 95%. |
Total directly or indirectly standardized effects
| Standardized Total Effects | Standardized Direct Effects | Standardized Indirect Effects | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stressors of aging | Stressors of aging | Stressors of aging | |
| Disappointment | .708 | .708 | .000 |
| Seclusion | .591 | .591 | .000 |
| Home empty | .478 | .478 | .000 |
| Relationship problems | .545 | .545 | .000 |
| Physiological problems | .515 | .515 | .000 |
| Disability and independence | .569 | .569 | .000 |
The final model-fitting index of the study
| Acceptation level | Obtained value | Interpretation | Accepted level | Standard criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accepted | 283.483 | Chi-square achieved compared with the chi-square table for a particular degree of freedom. | Value of chi-square in the table | Chi-square CIMIN |
| Accepted | .042 | Should be less than 0.5 | Less than 0.5 | The root mean square error of estimate (RMSEA) |
| Rather Accepted | .854 | Near to 0.95 is fitted | Zero (non-fitted), one (good fitted) | Louise Tucker TLI |
| Accepted | 4.899 | Smaller than 1 shows weakness; larger than 5 shows the need to improve fitness levels. | 1 to 5 | relative Chi-square CMIN/ DF |
| Rather Accepted | 0.575 | Should be more than 0.5 or 0.6 | Normalized frugal fit index PNFI | |
| Rather Accepted | 0.589 | Should be more than 0.5 or 0.6 | Comparative frugal fit index PCFI | |
| Rather Accepted | 0.848 | Should be more than 0.9 | Comparing the model to model without its relationship | Bentley Bonet index NFI normalized Fitness indicator |
| Rather Accepted | .883 | Should be more than 0.9 | Examining the model with model beyond its relationship | CFI |
| Rather Accepted | .878 | Standard value is more than 0.9 | Between 0 and 1 | incremental Fitness index IFI |
| Chi-square = 283.483 | ||||
| Degrees of freedom = 15 | ||||
| Probability level = .000 |