Literature DB >> 28316561

Cellular enrichment through microfluidic fractionation based on cell biomechanical properties.

Gonghao Wang1, Cory Turbyfield2, Kaci Crawford2, Alexander Alexeev1, Todd Sulchek3.   

Abstract

The biomechanical properties of populations of diseased cells are shown to have differences from healthy populations of cells, yet the overlap of these biomechanical properties can limit their use in disease cell enrichment and detection. We report a new microfluidic cell enrichment technology that continuously fractionates cells through differences in biomechanical properties, resulting in highly pure cellular subpopulations. Cell fractionation is achieved in a microfluidic channel with an array of diagonal ridges that are designed to segregate biomechanically distinct cells to different locations in the channel. Due to the imposition of elastic and viscous forces during cellular compression, which are a function of cell biomechanical properties including size and viscoelasticity, larger, stiffer and less viscos cells migrate parallel to the diagonal ridges and exhibit positive lateral displacement. On the other hand, smaller, softer and more viscous cells migrate perpendicular to the diagonal ridges due to circulatory flow induced by the ridges and result in negative lateral displacement. Multiple outlets are then utilized to collect cells with finer gradation of differences in cell biomechanical properties. The result is that cell fractionation dramatically improves cell separation efficiency compared to binary outputs and enables the measurement of subtle biomechanical differences within a single cell type. As a proof-of-concept demonstration, we mix two different leukemia cell lines (K562 and HL60) and utilize cell fractionation to achieve over 45-fold enhancement of cell populations, with high purity cellular enrichment (90% to 99%) of each cell line. In addition, we demonstrate cell fractionation of a single cell type (K562 cells) into subpopulations and characterize the variations of biomechanical properties of the separated cells with atomic force microscopy. These results will be beneficial to obtaining label-free separation of cellular mixtures, or to better investigate the origins of biomechanical differences in a single cell type.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 28316561      PMCID: PMC5354170          DOI: 10.1007/s10404-015-1608-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microfluid Nanofluidics        ISSN: 1613-4982            Impact factor:   2.529


  32 in total

1.  A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: do cell properties reflect metastatic potential?

Authors:  Eric M Darling; Stefan Zauscher; Joel A Block; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Nuclear shape, mechanics, and mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Kris Noel Dahl; Alexandre J S Ribeiro; Jan Lammerding
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Viscoelasticity as a biomarker for high-throughput flow cytometry.

Authors:  Tobias Sawetzki; Charles D Eggleton; Sanjay A Desai; David W M Marr
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Size-exclusion chromatography with on-line light-scattering, absorbance, and refractive index detectors for studying proteins and their interactions.

Authors:  J Wen; T Arakawa; J S Philo
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1996-09-05       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Surface acoustic wave actuated cell sorting (SAWACS).

Authors:  T Franke; S Braunmüller; L Schmid; A Wixforth; D A Weitz
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Deformability based cell margination--a simple microfluidic design for malaria-infected erythrocyte separation.

Authors:  Han Wei Hou; Ali Asgar S Bhagat; Alvin Guo Lin Chong; Pan Mao; Kevin Shyong Wei Tan; Jongyoon Han; Chwee Teck Lim
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  A microfabricated deformability-based flow cytometer with application to malaria.

Authors:  Hansen Bow; Igor V Pivkin; Monica Diez-Silva; Stephen J Goldfless; Ming Dao; Jacquin C Niles; Subra Suresh; Jongyoon Han
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  An equilibrium method for continuous-flow cell sorting using dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  M D Vahey; J Voldman
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients.

Authors:  Sarah E Cross; Yu-Sheng Jin; Jianyu Rao; James K Gimzewski
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2007-12-02       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Stiffness dependent separation of cells in a microfluidic device.

Authors:  Gonghao Wang; Wenbin Mao; Rebecca Byler; Krishna Patel; Caitlin Henegar; Alexander Alexeev; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Cell trapping in Y-junction microchannels: A numerical study of the bifurcation angle effect in inertial microfluidics.

Authors:  Scott J Hymel; Hongzhi Lan; Hideki Fujioka; Damir B Khismatullin
Journal:  Phys Fluids (1994)       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.521

2.  Scaling microfluidic throughput with flow-balanced manifolds to simply control devices with multiple inlets and outlets.

Authors:  Katherine M Young; Peter G Shankles; Theresa Chen; Kelly Ahkee; Sydney Bules; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.258

3.  Microfluidic generation of transient cell volume exchange for convectively driven intracellular delivery of large macromolecules.

Authors:  Anna Liu; Muhymin Islam; Nicholas Stone; Vikram Varadarajan; Jenny Jeong; Sam Bowie; Peng Qiu; Edmund K Waller; Alexander Alexeev; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 31.041

4.  Microfluidic cell sorting by stiffness to examine heterogenic responses of cancer cells to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Muhymin Islam; Roman Mezencev; Brynn McFarland; Hannah Brink; Betsy Campbell; Bushra Tasadduq; Edmund K Waller; Wilbur Lam; Alexander Alexeev; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 8.469

5.  Biophysical subsets of embryonic stem cells display distinct phenotypic and morphological signatures.

Authors:  Tom Bongiorno; Jeremy Gura; Priyanka Talwar; Dwight Chambers; Katherine M Young; Dalia Arafat; Gonghao Wang; Emily L Jackson-Holmes; Peng Qiu; Todd C McDevitt; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Microfluidic Sorting of Cells by Viability Based on Differences in Cell Stiffness.

Authors:  Muhymin Islam; Hannah Brink; Syndey Blanche; Caleb DiPrete; Tom Bongiorno; Nicholas Stone; Anna Liu; Anisha Philip; Gonghao Wang; Wilbur Lam; Alexander Alexeev; Edmund K Waller; Todd Sulchek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.