| Literature DB >> 28316468 |
Sung-Won Kang1, Hye-Min Kim1, M Shafiur Rahman1, Ah-Na Kim1, Han-Sul Yang1, Sung-Gil Choi2.
Abstract
Defatted bovine liver (DBL) is a potential source of protein and minerals. Supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) and a traditional organic solvent method were used to remove lipid from bovine liver, and the quality characteristics of a control bovine liver (CBL), bovine liver defatted by SC-CO2 (DBLSC-CO2) at different pressures, and bovine liver defatted by organic solvent (DBL-OS) were compared. The DBLSC-CO2 samples had significantly higher (p<0.05) protein, amino acid, carbohydrate, and fiber contents than CBL and DBL-OS. There was a higher yield of lipid from CBL when using SC-CO2 than the organic solvent method. SDS-PAGE analysis demonstrated that the CBL and DBLSC-CO2 had protein bands of a similar intensity and area, whereas DBL-OS appeared extremely poor bands or no bands due to the degradation of proteins, particularly in the 50 to 75 kDa and 20 to 25 kDa molecular weight ranges. In addition, DBLSC-CO2 was shown to have superior functional properties in terms of total soluble content, water and oil absorption, and foaming and emulsification properties. Therefore, SC-CO2 treatment offers a nutritionally and environmentally friendly approach for the removal of lipid from high protein food sources. In addition, SC-CO2 may be a better substitute of traditional organic solvent extraction for producing more stable and high quality foods with high-protein, fat-free, and low calorie contents.Entities:
Keywords: bovine liver; defatted; organic solvent; quality characteristics; supercritical carbon dioxide
Year: 2017 PMID: 28316468 PMCID: PMC5355581 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.1.29
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Fig. 1.Schematic of supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) treatment system.
Proximate composition of CBL, DBLSC-CO2, and DBL-OS samples
| Components (%) | CBL | DBLSC-CO2 | DBL-OS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 bar | 300 bar | 450 bar | Ether | CM | ||
| Moisture | 4.78±0.34b1 | 5.96±1.23ab | 6.78±1.46ab | 6.49±0.96ab | 7.81±0.23a | 7.43±2.46a |
| Protein | 49.26±1.93c | 59.99±1.18a | 60.04±3.56a | 60.99±2.40a | 55.19±1.22b | 57.06±1.66ab |
| Fat | 32.09±0.60a | 5.04±1.38c | 4.49±0.38c | 3.08±0.36c | 9.50±0.30b | 9.52±2.47b |
| Ash | 11.61±0.64bc | 10.38±2.87c | 11.01±0.34bc | 11.57±2.25bc | 14.86±0.21b | 12.97±0.27ab |
| Carbohydrate and fibers | 2.26 | 18.63 | 17.68 | 17.87 | 12.64 | 13.02 |
1 All values are mean±SD (n=3). Different letters indicate that means are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s test.
Fig. 2.Yield of lipid using SC-CO2 and organic solvents extraction methods (%).
Fig. 3.The sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) patterns of different bovine liver samples.
Amino acid composition of CBL, DBLSC-CO2, and DBL-OS samples (Unit: mg/100 g)
| Amino acids | Control | DBLSC-CO2 | DBL-OS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200 bar | 300 bar | 450 bar | Ether | CM1 | ||
| Total essential amino acids | 9718.68 | 8033.95 | 8132.15 | 7959.40 | 5624.79 | 4035.68 |
| Threonine | 507.03a2±2.63 | 367.78b±0.21 | 349.34c±0.62 | 330.42d±2.27 | 260.29e±1.22 | 187.02f±0.26 |
| Valine | 1199.25a±3.16 | 910.80d±2.84 | 941.63c±3.16 | 993.85b±0.21 | 663.49e±2.45 | 452.52f±2.15 |
| Methionine | 491.64a±1.00 | 448.43b±2.94 | 435.29c±3.26 | 399.58d±0.02 | 301.97e±2.51 | 215.31f±2.21 |
| Isoleucine | 742.43a±0.36 | 562.88d±0.39 | 585.93c±1.95 | 625.82b±1.49 | 461.82e±1.29 | 290.70f±1.69 |
| Leucine | 2059.96a±2.51 | 1571.41d±0.28 | 1675.56c±0.39 | 1729.67b±0.19 | 1003.82e±0.21 | 862.16f±0.35 |
| Phenylalanine | 1165.55a±3.37 | 912.10d±2.04 | 984.65c±2.10 | 1001.13b±4.00 | 629.12e±1.95 | 503.07f±0.54 |
| Histidine | 495.06a±2.62 | 432.45b±0.05 | 412.63c±1.39 | 375.38e±2.81 | 406.56d±1.22 | 195.96f±2.09 |
| Lysine | 1649.63a±2.15 | 1505.79b±1.69 | 1443.20c±0.33 | 1360.90e±3.20 | 1122.59d±2.43 | 717.92f±2.29 |
| Arginine | 1408.13a±3.16 | 1322.31b±3.30 | 1303.92c±0.32 | 1142.65d±2.45 | 775.13e±2.64 | 611.01f±1.43 |
| Total nonessential amino acids | 6263.24 | 5269.69 | 5192.50 | 5073.43 | 4034.89 | 3184.98 |
| Aspartic acid | 132.24a±2.61 | 63.79b±0.11 | 62.38b±0.46 | 52.76d±1.32 | 60.03c±1.03 | 59.81c±2.11 |
| Serine | 71.66a±1.37 | 40.15b±3.10 | 33.40c±2.63 | 29.18c±1.44 | 24.68d±2.11 | 19.80e±0.24 |
| Glutamic acid | 13.73a±2.12 | 8.55b±1.09 | 7.69b±2.10 | 6.93b±2.87 | 7.02b±1.28 | 7.49b±3.41 |
| Proline | 1371.24a±1.11 | 1136.67c±1.00 | 1138.77c±4.10 | 1210.28b±2.92 | 609.66e±2.11 | 609.66e±2.11 |
| Glycine | 833.94a±2.01 | 675.61c±2.21 | 620.10e±2.08 | 605.42f±1.05 | 730.40b±1.47 | 673.05d±3.33 |
| Alanine | 2707.15a±2.17 | 2335.73b±2.01 | 2328.59c±4.12 | 2225.55d±2.74 | 1420.21e±2.19 | 1106.66f±3.25 |
| Cysteine | 299.02a±2.96 | 276.97d±2.06 | 278.58c±0.49 | 291.87b±1.93 | 230.52e±1.97 | 141.80f±2.40 |
| Tyrosine | 834.26a±1.41 | 732.22b±3.83 | 722.99c±2.01 | 651.44d±3.26 | 640.58e±2.74 | 566.71f±2.57 |
| Total amino acids | 13532.60 | 13573.00 | 13573.00 | 12555.52 | 9659.68 | 7220.66 |
1Chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v).
2All values are mean±SD (n=3). Different letters indicate that means are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s test.
Fig. 4.Water absorption capacity (WAC) and oil absorption capacity (OAC) of different bovine liver (g/g) samples.
Fig. 5.Total soluble contents of different bovine liver samples (%).
Fig. 6.Emulsifying activity (EA) and emulsion stability (ES) of CBL, DBLSC-CO2 and DBL-OS (%).
Fig. 7.(A) Foaming capacity (FC) after homogenization and foaming stability (FS) after 1 h of homogenization (%), (B) FS reduction ratio against time when total volume was considered 100% for each samples.