Literature DB >> 28315417

Higher BMI is associated with stronger effects of social cues on everyday snacking behaviour.

Benjamin Schüz1, Sarah Revell2, Andrew P Hills3, Natalie Schüz3, Stuart G Ferguson4.   

Abstract

Discretionary food choices (snacks) contribute up to a third of the daily energy intake and potentially contribute to energy imbalance and weight gain. Individual snack intake behaviour is guided by internal and external cues, with social cues (seeing others eat, being alone) consistently showing large effects. A wide body of (mainly laboratory-based) research suggests marked differences in people's response to eating cues based on BMI. Here, we show that these BMI differences in cue responsiveness also pertain to everyday snacking behaviour. In two combined ecological momentary assessment studies, 122 participants with BMIs ranging from 18.34 to 45.71 kg/m2 logged their everyday snacking behaviour in real-time over two weeks along with the presence or absence of social cues. Random-effects modelling showed that people with higher BMI were more likely to consume high-energy snacks when alone, and were more likely to consume low-energy snacks in the presence of others eating. This suggests BMI differences in cue responsiveness that are in line with impression management theory and underlines the importance of social cues for snacking behaviour and provides avenues for both theory and intervention development.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Eating; Ecological momentary assessment; Snacking; Social influence

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28315417     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  5 in total

1.  Frequency of eating alone is associated with adolescent dietary intake, perceived food-related parenting practices and weight status: cross-sectional Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health, and Eating (FLASHE) Study results.

Authors:  Marla Reicks; Cynthia Davey; Alex Kojo Anderson; Jinan Banna; Mary Cluskey; Carolyn Gunther; Blake Jones; Rickelle Richards; Glade Topham; Siew Sun Wong
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Highly processed food intake and immediate and future emotions in everyday life.

Authors:  Jenna R Cummings; Emma T Schiestl; A Janet Tomiyama; Tanvi Mamtora; Ashley N Gearhardt
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Habit strength and between-meal snacking in daily life: the moderating role of level of education.

Authors:  Saskia Wouters; Viviane Thewissen; Mira Duif; Rob Jh van Bree; Lilian Lechner; Nele Jacobs
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment of Diet: Implications and Perspectives for Nutritional Epidemiology.

Authors:  Andrea Maugeri; Martina Barchitta
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  The Use of Food Images and Crowdsourcing to Capture Real-time Eating Behaviors: Acceptability and Usability Study.

Authors:  Katharine Harrington; Shannon N Zenk; Linda Van Horn; Lauren Giurini; Nithya Mahakala; Kiarri N Kershaw
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-12-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.