| Literature DB >> 28314788 |
Jacob D Soumerai1, Andrew D Zelenetz2, Craig H Moskowitz2,3, M Lia Palomba2, Paul A Hamlin2, Ariela Noy2, David J Straus2, Alison J Moskowitz2, Anas Younes2, Matthew J Matasar2,3, Steven M Horwitz2, Carol S Portlock2, Jason A Konner4, Mrinal M Gounder4, David M Hyman4, Martin H Voss4, Matthew G Fury4, Devika Gajria4, Richard D Carvajal4, Alan L Ho4, Jan H Beumer5,6,7, Brian Kiesel5, Zhigang Zhang8, Alice Chen9, Richard F Little9, Christine Jarjies10, Thu O Dang10, Fallon France10, Nishant Mishra10, John F Gerecitano2,4.
Abstract
Purpose: The PARP inhibitor veliparib enhances the cytotoxicity of alkylating agents. This phase I study evaluated veliparib with the bifunctional alkylator bendamustine (VB) in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and solid malignancies, with a cohort expansion of VB with rituximab (VBR) in patients with B-cell lymphomas.Experimental Design: This dose-escalation study evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of veliparib (20-400 mg twice a day, days 1-7 of 28-day cycle) and bendamustine (70 and 90 mg/m2 intravenously, days 1 and 2). A cohort expansion was conducted, which combined veliparib and bendamustine at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) with rituximab (375 mg/m2, day 1) in patients with B-cell lymphomas. Thirty-four patients were treated in seven dose-escalation cohorts and seven patients in the dose-expansion cohort.<br> Results: The MTD was veliparib 300 mg twice daily plus bendamustine 90 mg/m2 Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were anemia, nausea, hypertension, and hyperhidrosis. Grade ≥3 toxicities included lymphopenia (87.8%), anemia (19.5%), neutropenia (12.2%), thrombocytopenia (9.8%), leukopenia (9.8%), nausea (7.3%), and hypophosphatemia (7.3%). Apparent veliparib clearance was slightly lower than previously reported. Of 14 patients with lymphoma evaluable for response, five of seven (71%) on VB and six of seven (86%) on VBR achieved objective response. One patient with multiple myeloma achieved partial response.Conclusions: VB and VBR were generally well-tolerated. VBR had preliminary clinical activity in patients with B-cell lymphoma, which warrants further investigation in a phase II trial. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01326702 Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4119-26. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28314788 PMCID: PMC5541854 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-3068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 1078-0432 Impact factor: 12.531