Literature DB >> 28313942

Predator impacts on stream benthic prey.

David Wooster1.   

Abstract

The impact that predators have on benthic, macroinvertebrate prey density in streams is unclear. While some studies show a strong effect of predators on prey density, others show little or no effect. Two factors appear to influence the detection of predator impact on prey density in streams. First, many field studies have small sample sizes and thus might be unable to detect treatment effects. Second, streams contain two broad classes of predators, invertebrates and vertebrates, which might have different impacts on prey density for a variety of reasons, including availability of refuge for prey and prey emigration responses to the two types of predators. In addition, predatory vertebrates have more complex prey communities than predatory invertebrates; this complexity might reduce the impact that predatory vertebrates have on prey because of indirect effects. I conducted a meta-analysis on the results of field studies that manipulate predator density in enclosures to determine (1) if predators have a significant impact on benthic prey density in streams, (2) if the impacts that predatory invertebrates and vertebrates have differ, and (3) if predatory vertebrates have different impacts on predatory prey versus herbivorous prey. The results of the meta-analysis suggest that on average predators have a significant negative effect on prey density, predatory invertebrates have a significantly stronger impact than predatory vertebrates, and predatory vertebrates do not differ in their impact on predatory versus herbivorous invertebrate prey. Three methodological variables (mesh size of enclosures, size of enclosures, and experimental duration) were examined to determine if cross correlations exist that may explain the differences in impact between predatory invertebrates and vertebrates. No correlation exists between mesh size and predator impact. Over all predators, no correlation exists between experimental duration and predator impact; however, within predatory invertebrates a correlation does exist between these variables. Also, a correlation was found between enclosure size and predator impact. This correlation potentially explains the difference in impact between predatory invertebrates and predatory vertebrates. Results of the meta-analysis suggest two important areas for future research: (1) manipulate both types of predators within the same system, and (2) examine their impacts on the same spatial scale.

Keywords:  Benthic invertebrates; Meta-analysis; Predator impacts; Streams

Year:  1994        PMID: 28313942     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  The importance of predation, substrate and spatial refugia in determining lotic insect distributions.

Authors:  Alexander S Flecker; J David Allan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The effects of predation and detritus on the structure of a stream insect community: a field test.

Authors:  Alexander S Flecker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effect of an abiotic disturbance on a lotic predator-prey interaction.

Authors:  Sandra J Walde
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Prey preference in stoneflies: a comparative analysis of prey vulnerability.

Authors:  J D Allan; A S Flecker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Balancing risks? Responses and non-responses of mayfly larvae to fish and stonefly predators.

Authors:  Daniel A Soluk; Nicholas C Collins
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A mechanism for interference between stream predators: responses of the stonefly Agnetina capitata to the presence of sculpins.

Authors:  Daniel A Soluk; Nicholas C Collins
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Predation and drift of lotic macroinvertebrates during colonization.

Authors:  J Lancaster
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Can nutrients mask community responses to insecticide mixtures?

Authors:  Alexa C Alexander; Ana T Luis; Joseph M Culp; Donald J Baird; Allan J Cessna
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Effects of stream predator richness on the prey community and ecosystem attributes.

Authors:  Erika Nilsson; Karin Olsson; Anders Persson; Per Nyström; Gustav Svensson; Ulf Nilsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Subsidies to predators, apparent competition and the phylogenetic structure of prey communities.

Authors:  Matthew R Helmus; Norman Mercado-Silva; M Jake Vander Zanden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Selective foraging by non-native rainbow trout on invertebrates in Patagonian streams in Argentina.

Authors:  Cecilia Yanina Di Prinzio; Guillermo Omad; María Laura Miserendino; Ricardo Casaux
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  How do grazers affect periphyton heterogeneity in streams?

Authors:  Maruxa Alvarez; Barbara L Peckarsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of predation risk on population variation in adult size in a stream-dwelling isopod.

Authors:  Timothy C Sparkes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Interactions between fish, grazing invertebrates and algae in a New Zealand stream: a trophic cascade mediated by fish-induced changes to grazer behaviour?

Authors:  Angus R McIntosh; Colin R Townsend
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.225

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.