Literature DB >> 28313936

The relationship between population size, amount of brood, and individual foraging behaviour in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L.

C D Eckert1, M L Winston1, R C Ydenberg1.   

Abstract

This study experimentally examines the relationship between colony state and the behaviour of individual pollen and nectar foragers in the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. In the first experiment we test the prediction that individual pollen foragers from colonies with higher brood quantities should exhibit a greater work effort for pollen resources than individual pollen foragers from colonies with low brood quantities. Eight colonies were assigned into two treatment groups; HIGH brood colonies were manipulated to contain 9600±480 cm2 brood area; LOW brood colonies were manipulated to contain 1600±80 cm2 brood area. We measured colony brood levels over the course of the experiment and collected individual pollen loads from returning pollen foragers. We found that, while colonies remained significantly different in brood levels, individual pollen foragers from HIGH brood colonies collected larger loads than individuals from LOW brood colonies. In the second experiment we investigated the influence of colony size on the behaviour of individual nectar foragers. We assigned eight colonies to two treatment groups; LARGE colonies were manipulated to contain 35000±1700 adult workers with 3500±175 cm2 brood area, and SMALL colonies were manipulated to contain 10000±500 adult workers with 1000±50 cm2 brood area. We observed foraging trips of individually marked workers and found that individuals from LARGE colonies made longer foraging trips than those from SMALL colonies (LARGE: 1666.7±126.4 seconds, SMALL: 1210.8±157.6 seconds), and collected larter nectar loads (LARGE: 19.2±1.0 μl, SMALL: 14.6±0.8 μl). These results indicate that individual nectar foragers from LARGE colonies tend to work harder than individuals from SMALL colonies. Both experiments indicate that the values of nectar and pollen resources to a colony change depend on colony state, and that individual foragers modify their behaviour accordingly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colony state; Foraging behaviour; Honey bee

Year:  1994        PMID: 28313936     DOI: 10.1007/BF00323157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  2 in total

1.  On the calculation of sugar concentration in flower nectar.

Authors:  Alan B Bolten; Peter Feinsinger; Herbert G Baker; Irene Baker
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Factors determining the collection of pollen by honeybee foragers.

Authors:  J B Free
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.844

  2 in total
  12 in total

1.  Pheromone-modulated behavioral suites influence colony growth in the honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Tanya Pankiw; Roman Roman; Ramesh R Sagili; Keyan Zhu-Salzman
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-09-25

2.  Stingless bees (Melipona subnitida) adjust brood production rather than foraging activity in response to changes in pollen stores.

Authors:  Camila Maia-Silva; Michael Hrncir; Vera Lucia Imperatriz-Fonseca; Dirk Louis P Schorkopf
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Division of labor associated with brood rearing in the honey bee: how does it translate to colony fitness?

Authors:  Ramesh R Sagili; Tanya Pankiw; Bradley N Metz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The relationship between canopy cover and colony size of the wood ant Formica lugubris--implications for the thermal effects on a keystone ant species.

Authors:  Yi-Huei Chen; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Nosema spp. infection and its negative effects on honey bees (Apis mellifera iberiensis) at the colony level.

Authors:  Cristina Botías; Raquel Martín-Hernández; Laura Barrios; Aránzazu Meana; Mariano Higes
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Sub-lethal effects of dietary neonicotinoid insecticide exposure on honey bee queen fecundity and colony development.

Authors:  Judy Wu-Smart; Marla Spivak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Pan Traps for Tracking Honey Bee Activity-Density: A Case Study in Soybeans.

Authors:  Ashley L St Clair; Adam G Dolezal; Matthew E O'Neal; Amy L Toth
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Comparison of Honey Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Colony Units of Different Sizes as Pollinators of Hybrid Seed Canola.

Authors:  Lynae P Ovinge; Shelley E Hoover
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Pollen Collection, Honey Production, and Pollination Services: Managing Honey Bees in an Agricultural Setting.

Authors:  Shelley E Hoover; Lynae P Ovinge
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  A mathematical model of honey bee colony dynamics to predict the effect of pollen on colony failure.

Authors:  Shahin Bagheri; Mehdi Mirzaie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.