Literature DB >> 28313923

Effects of host switching on gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) under field conditions.

J L Stoyenoff1, J A Witter1, M E Montgomery2, C A Chilcote3.   

Abstract

Effects of various single and two species diets on the performance of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) were studied when this insect was reared from hatch to population on intact host trees in the field. The tree species used for this study were red oak (Quercus rubra L.), white oak (Q. alba L.), bigtooth aspen (Populus grandidentata Michaux), and trembling aspen (P. tremuloides Michaux). These are commonly available host trees in the Lake States region. The study spanned two years and was performed at two different field sites in central Michigan. Conclusions drawn from this study include: (1) Large differences in gypsy moth growth and survival can occur even among diet sequences composed of favorable host species. (2) Larvae that spent their first two weeks feeding on red oak performed better during this time period than larvae on all other host species in terms of mean weight, mean relative growth rate (RGR), and mean level of larval development, while larvae on a first host of bigtooth aspen were ranked lowest in terms of mean weight, RGR, and level of larval development. (3) Combination diets do not seem to be inherently better or worse than diets composed of only a single species; rather, insect performance was affected by the types of host species eaten and the time during larval development that these host species were consumed instead of whether larvae ate single species diets or mixed species diets. (4) In diets composed of two host species, measures of gypsy moth performance are affected to different extents in the latter part of the season by the two different hosts; larval weights and development rates show continued effects of the first host fed upon while RGRs, mortality, and pupal weights are affected strongly by the second host type eaten. (5) Of the diets investigated in this study, early feeding on red oak followed by later feeding on an aspen, particularly trembling aspen, is most beneficial to insects in terms of attaining high levels of performance throughout their lives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diet sequences; Gypsy moth; Host switching; Insect/plant interactions

Year:  1994        PMID: 28313923     DOI: 10.1007/BF00323144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  NADPH-cytodhrome-c-reductase: changes in specific activity in gypsy moth larvae.

Authors:  S Ahmad; A J Forgash
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.354

2.  GENETIC VARIATION AND HOST PLANT RELATIONS IN A PARTHENOGENETIC MOTH.

Authors:  Charles Mitter; Douglas J Futuyma; John C Schneider; J Daniel Hare
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Hostplant, larval age, and feeding behavior influence midgut pH in the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar).

Authors:  J C Schultz; M J Lechowicz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Relationships between leaf age and the food quality of cottonwood foliage for the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar.

Authors:  G A Meyer; M E Montgomery
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Facultative monophagy as a consequence of prior feeding experience: behavioral and physiological specialization in Colias philodice larvae.

Authors:  D N Karowe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Sequential diets, metabolic costs, and growth of Spodoptera eridania (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) feeding upon dill, lima bean, and cabbage.

Authors:  J Mark Scriber
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Ecological significance of mixed-function oxidations.

Authors:  L B Brattsten
Journal:  Drug Metab Rev       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.518

8.  In vitro microsomal epoxidase activity and susceptibility to carbaryl and carbaryl-piperonyl butoxide combinations in house crickets of different age and sex.

Authors:  G M Benke; C F Wilkinson
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Suitability, digestibility and assimilation of various host plants of the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar L.

Authors:  Pedro Barbosa; Jane Greenblatt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Leaf phenolic inhibition of gypsy moth nuclear polyhedrosis virus Role of polyhedral inclusion body aggregation.

Authors:  S T Keating; M D Hunter; J C Schultz
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.626

View more
  6 in total

1.  Phenotypic plasticity and nutrition in a phytophagous insect: consequences of colonizing a new host.

Authors:  Marcus Leclaire; Roland Brandl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Nutritional indices in the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) under field conditions and host switching situations.

Authors:  J L Stoyenoff; J A Witter; M E Montgomery
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Host-choice reduces, but does not eliminate, the negative effects of a multi-species diet for an herbivorous beetle.

Authors:  William C Wetzel; Jennifer S Thaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Census of the bacterial community of the gypsy moth larval midgut by using culturing and culture-independent methods.

Authors:  Nichole A Broderick; Kenneth F Raffa; Robert M Goodman; Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Early-season host switching in Adelphocoris spp. (Hemiptera: Miridae) of differing host breadth.

Authors:  Hongsheng Pan; Yanhui Lu; Kris A G Wyckhuys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Polyculture and Monoculture Affect the Fitness, Behavior and Detoxification Metabolism of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae).

Authors:  Ning Di; Kai Zhang; Fan Zhang; Su Wang; Tong-Xian Liu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.