Literature DB >> 28313911

Piscivore efficiency and refuging prey: the importance of predator search mode.

Peter Eklöv1, Sebastian Diehl1.   

Abstract

In predator-prey interactions, the efficiency of the predator is dependent on characteristics of both the predator and the prey, as well as the structure of the environment. In a field enclosure experiment, we tested the effects of a prey refuge on predator search mode, predator efficiency and prey behaviour. Replicated enclosures containing young of the year (0+) and 1-year-old (1+) perch were stocked with 3 differentially sized individuals of either of 2 piscivorous species, perch (Perca fluviatilis), pike (Esox lucius) or no piscivorous predators. Each enclosure contained an open predator area with three small vegetation patches, and a vegetated absolute refuge for the prey. We quantified the behaviour of the predators and the prey simultaneously, and at the end of the experiment the growth of the predators and the mortality and habitat use of the prey were estimated. The activity mode of both predator species was stationary. Perch stayed in pairs in the vegetation patches whereas pike remained solitary and occupied the corners of the enclosure. The largest pike individuals stayed closest to the prey refuge whereas the smallest individuals stayed farthest away from the prey refuge, indicating size-dependent interference among pike. Both size classes of prey showed stronger behavioural responses to pike than to perch with respect to refuge use, distance from refuge and distance to the nearest predator. Prey mortality was higher in the presence of pike than in the presence of perch. Predators decreased in body mass in all treatments, and perch showed a relatively stronger decrease in body mass than pike during the experiment. Growth differences of perch and pike, and mortality differences of prey caused by predation, can be explained by predator morphology, predator attack efficiency and social versus interference behaviour of the predators. These considerations suggest that pike are more efficient piscivores around prey refuges such as the littoral zones of lakes, whereas perch have previously been observed to be more efficient in open areas, such as in the pelagic zones of lakes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Piscivore-prev interactions; Predator search mode; Prey refuge; Size-specific prey vulnerability

Year:  1994        PMID: 28313911     DOI: 10.1007/BF00324223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands?

Authors:  A Sih
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Complex predator-prey interactions and predator intimidation among crayfish, piscivorous fish, and small benthic fish.

Authors:  Frank J Rahel; Roy A Stein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.

Authors:  J Altmann
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 1.991

  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  Is prey predation risk influenced more by increasing predator density or predator species richness in stream enclosures?

Authors:  Heather D Vance-Chalcraft; Daniel A Soluk; Nicholas Ozburn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Differential effects of habitat complexity, predators and competitors on abundance of juvenile and adult coral reef fishes.

Authors:  Glenn R Almany
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-06-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Coexistence of behavioural types in an aquatic top predator: a response to resource limitation?

Authors:  Alexander Kobler; Thomas Klefoth; Thomas Mehner; Robert Arlinghaus
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The effect of habitat structure on prey mortality depends on predator and prey microhabitat use.

Authors:  Jan Klecka; David S Boukal
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Zebra mussels affect benthic predator foraging success and habitat choice on soft sediments.

Authors:  M A Beekey; D J McCabe; J E Marsden
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-07-24       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Facing different predators: adaptiveness of behavioral and morphological traits under predation.

Authors:  Martina Heynen; Nils Bunnefeld; Jost Borcherding
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.624

7.  Network of small no-take marine reserves reveals greater abundance and body size of fisheries target species.

Authors:  Fernanda A Rolim; Tim Langlois; Pedro F C Rodrigues; Todd Bond; Fábio S Motta; Leonardo M Neves; Otto B F Gadig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predator community and resource use jointly modulate the inducible defense response in body height of crucian carp.

Authors:  Ilaria de Meo; Kjartan Østbye; Kimmo K Kahilainen; Brian Hayden; Christian H H Fagertun; Antonio B S Poléo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Predation on the Invasive Copepod, Pseudodiaptomus forbesi, and Native Zooplankton in the Lower Columbia River: An Experimental Approach to Quantify Differences in Prey-Specific Feeding Rates.

Authors:  Jesse B Adams; Stephen M Bollens; John G Bishop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessing Potential Vulnerability and Response of Fish to Simulated Avian Predation after Exposure to Psychotropic Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Melanie L Hedgespeth; Per Anders Nilsson; Olof Berglund
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2016-04-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.