Literature DB >> 28313498

Male parasitism and intrasexual competition in a burrowing barnacle.

Nicholas J Gotelli1, Henry R Spivey2.   

Abstract

In sexually dimorphic animals, large male body size is often associated with direct interference competition among males for access to females or resources used in reproduction. In constrast, small male body size may be associated with indirect scramble competition among males for temporal or spatial access to females. Minute, "parasitic" males of the acrothoracican barnacleTrypetesa lampas (Hancock) appear to compete with one another for permanent attachment sites on the external body of the female. Several spatial patterns suggest indirect male-male competition: 1) males were consistently aggregated on the anterior surface of the female ovarian disc; 2) the average distance from attached males to the site of insemination correlated positively with local male density; 3) average male body size on a female decreased as a function of male density; 4) the distribution of males on the left and right hand sides of the female ovarian disc was more even than expected, suggesting that males avoided crowded settlement sites. The number of males attached to a female increased with female body size and matched a null model in which males colonized female "targets" of differing areas. These results suggest that competition between males primarily affected settlement sites and male body sizes within, rather than among, females. Male parasitism may have evolved through both sexual selection for efficient access to females (Ghiselin 1974) and natural selection for reduced burrow density in a space-limited habitat (Turner and Yakovlev 1983).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acrothoracica; Male parasitism; Male-male competition; Sexual selection

Year:  1992        PMID: 28313498     DOI: 10.1007/BF00650319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Dwarf males in the teredinidae (bivalvia, pholadacea).

Authors:  R D Turner; Y Yakovlev
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in turtles (order testudines).

Authors:  James F Berry; Richard Shine
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  ECOLOGICAL CAUSES OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM.

Authors:  Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  SEXUAL SELECTION IN A BRENTID WEEVIL.

Authors:  Leslie K Johnson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 5.  Ecological causes for the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  R Shine
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.875

6.  Alternative male life histories in bluegill sunfish.

Authors:  M R Gross; E L Charnov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  THE EVOLUTION OF MATING STRATEGIES IN BULLFROGS, RANA CATESBEIANA.

Authors:  Richard D Howard
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  MALE ALTERNATIVE REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN A MARINE ISOPOD CRUSTACEAN (PARACERCEIS SCULPTA): THE USE OF GENETIC MARKERS TO MEASURE DIFFERENCES IN FERTILIZATION SUCCESS AMONG α-, β-, AND γ-MALES.

Authors:  Stephen M Shuster
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.694

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Host Relation, Size and Reproduction in the Burrowing Barnacle Trypetesa lampas (Hancock) (Crustacea Cirripedia Acrothoracica).

Authors:  Sofie K D Nielsen; Jens T Høeg; Yoichi Yusa
Journal:  Zool Stud       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.058

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.