Literature DB >> 28313404

Possible indirect interactions between transient and resident killer whales: implications for the evolution of foraging specializations in the genus Orcinus.

Robin W Baird1,2, Peter A Abrams3, Lawrence M Dill1.   

Abstract

Two distinct forms of killer whale (Orcinus orca) occur off the coast of British Columbia, Alaska and Washington State. These have different diets, and may be reproductively isolated. Because the primary food of transient whales (pinnipeds) is a potential competitor for the primary food of resident whales (salmon), or for the smaller fishes on which salmon feed, there should be an indirect interaction between the two forms of killer whale. We use simple mathematical models to show that this interaction will be either of a "plus-minus" type, or a "plus-plus" type (indirect mutualism), depending on whether or not pinnipeds and residents are on the same trophic level. In the case of the "plus-minus" interaction, increasing the population density or improving the environmental conditions of transients will increase the population density of residents, while increasing resident populations will reduce the equilibrium population size of transients. In the case of the "plus-plus" interaction, increasing the population density or improving the environmental conditions of transients will increase the population density of residents, while increasing resident populations will reduce the equilibrium population size of transients. In the case of the "plus-plus" interaction, increasing the population density or improving the environmental conditions of transients will increase the population density of residents, and vice versa. Such effects may not be currently manifest due to reduced populations at most levels in the food web. Regardless, considering such indirect interactions may be important for the management of many of the species involved, and can also provide a valuable framework for examining the evolution of the two forms of killer whales. Frequency-dependent indirect interactions, acting in concert with density-dependence within populations and disruptive selection on prey-type specific foraging characteristics, may have favoured reproductive isolation of the two forms of killer whales. We suggest that these two forms of whale are in the process of speciating, i.e., the two forms are incipient species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foraging; Indirect interactions; Killer whales; Sympatric speciation

Year:  1992        PMID: 28313404     DOI: 10.1007/BF00319024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  2 in total

1.  Darwin's finches: Population variation and sympatric speciation.

Authors:  B R Grant; P R Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Complex foraging polymorphism in bluegill sunfish.

Authors:  T J Ehlinger; D S Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Factors affecting individual foraging specialization and temporal diet stability across the range of a large "generalist" apex predator.

Authors:  Adam E Rosenblatt; James C Nifong; Michael R Heithaus; Frank J Mazzotti; Michael S Cherkiss; Brian M Jeffery; Ruth M Elsey; Rachel A Decker; Brian R Silliman; Louis J Guillette; Russell H Lowers; Justin C Larson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Gene-culture coevolution in whales and dolphins.

Authors:  Hal Whitehead
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Pelagic and benthic ecosystems drive differences in population and individual specializations in marine predators.

Authors:  Sabrina Riverón; Vincent Raoult; Alastair M M Baylis; Kayleigh A Jones; David J Slip; Robert G Harcourt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Not in their genes: phenotypic flexibility, behavioural traditions and cultural evolution in wild bonnet macaques.

Authors:  Anindya Sinha
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.795

5.  Bats' conquest of a formidable foraging niche: the myriads of nocturnally migrating songbirds.

Authors:  Ana G Popa-Lisseanu; Antonio Delgado-Huertas; Manuela G Forero; Alicia Rodríguez; Raphaël Arlettaz; Carlos Ibáñez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Social Differentiation in Common Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) that Engage in Human-Related Foraging Behaviors.

Authors:  Carolyn J Kovacs; Robin M Perrtree; Tara M Cox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  First longitudinal study of seal-feeding killer whales (Orcinus orca) in Norwegian coastal waters.

Authors:  Eve Jourdain; Dag Vongraven; Anna Bisther; Richard Karoliussen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Simple foraging rules in competitive environments can generate socially structured populations.

Authors:  Mauricio Cantor; Damien R Farine
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.912

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.