Literature DB >> 28313401

Limits to predator regulation of rabbits in Australia: evidence from predator-removal experiments.

R P Pech1, A R E Sinclair2, A E Newsome1, P C Catling1.   

Abstract

Predator-prey studies in semi-arid eastern Australia demonstrated that populations of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) could be regulated by predators. The functional, numerical and total responses of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) to rabbits and the numerical response of feral cats (Felis catus) to rabbits, are described. Measurement of the rabbit component of foxes' stomach contents indicates a Type III functional response. The size of the fox population in summer was dependent on the availability of rabbits over the immediately preceding rabbit breeding season but there appeared to be no density-dependent aggregation of young foxes in areas of surplus food. The total response of foxes, estimated using the short-term numerical response of dispersing foxes, was directly density-dependent for low rabbit densities and inversely density-dependent for high rabbit densities. Two states are possible with this form of total response: a state with low rabbit densities regulated by predators and a state with high rabbit densities which occurs when rabbits escape predator regulation. The boundary between regulation and non-regulation by predators was demonstrated by a predator-removal experiment. In the treated areas, predators were initially culled and rabbits increased to higher densities than in an untreated area where predators were always present. When predators were allowed back into the treated areas, rabbit populations continued to increase and did not decline to the density in the untreated area. This is the critical evidence for a two-state system. When predators were present, rabbits could be maintained at low densities which were in the density-dependent part of the total response curve for foxes. Exceptionally high rabbit recruitment, or artificially reduced predation, could result in rabbits escaping predator-regulation. Under these circumstances, rabbits could move into the inversely density-dependent region of the total response curve for foxes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional response; Numerical response; Predator regulation; Predator removal

Year:  1992        PMID: 28313401     DOI: 10.1007/BF00319021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  Prolonged prey suppression by carnivores - predator-removal experiments.

Authors:  A E Newsome; I Parer; P C Catling
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Postnatal body weight changes of domestic cats maintained in an outdoor colony.

Authors:  L Rosenstein; E Berman
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 1.156

3.  Food caching by red foxes and some other carnivores.

Authors:  D W MacDonald
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1976-10
  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Predator-prey relationships in a Mediterranean vertebrate system: Bonelli's eagles, rabbits and partridges.

Authors:  Marcos Moleón; José A Sánchez-Zapata; José M Gil-Sánchez; Elena Ballesteros-Duperón; José M Barea-Azcón; Emilio Virgós
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Density dependence: an ecological Tower of Babel.

Authors:  Salvador Herrando-Pérez; Steven Delean; Barry W Brook; Corey J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of vertebrate predation on a caviomorph rodent, the degu (Octodon degus), in a semiarid thorn scrub community in Chile.

Authors:  P L Meserve; J R Gutiérrez; F M Jaksic
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The dilemma of foraging herbivores: dealing with food and fear.

Authors:  Clare McArthur; Peter B Banks; Rudy Boonstra; Jennifer Sorensen Forbey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Effects of predator removal on vertebrate prey populations: birds of prey and small mammals.

Authors:  Kai Norrdahl; Erkki Korpimäki
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Making inference from wildlife collision data: inferring predator absence from prey strikes.

Authors:  Peter Caley; Geoffrey R Hosack; Simon C Barry
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Modelling landscape-level numerical responses of predators to prey: the case of cats and rabbits.

Authors:  Jennyffer Cruz; Alistair S Glen; Roger P Pech
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.