Literature DB >> 28313386

Physiological and growth responses of Centaurea maculosa (Asteraceae) to root herbivory under varying levels of interspecific plant competition and soil nitrogen availability.

Thomas Steinger1, Heinz Müller-Schärer2.   

Abstract

Centaurea maculosa seedlings were grown in pots to study the effects of root herbivory by Agapeta zoegana L. (Lep.: Cochylidae) and Cyphocleonus achates Fahr. (Col.: Curculionidae), grass competition and nitrogen shortage (each present or absent), using a full factorial design. The aims of the study were to analyse the impact of root herbivory on plant growth, resource allocation and physiological processes, and to test if these plant responses to herbivory were influenced by plant competition and nitrogen availability. The two root herbivores differed markedly in their impact on plant growth. While feeding by the moth A. zoegana in the root cortex had no effect on shoot and root mass, feeding by the weevil C. achates in the central vascular tissue greatly reduced shoot mass, but not root mass, leading to a reduced shoot/root ratio. The absence of significant effects of the two herbivores on root biomass, despite considerable consumption, indicates that compensatory root growth occurred. Competition with grass affected plant growth more than herbivory and nutrient status, resulting in reduced shoot and root growth, and number of leaves. Nitrogen shortage did not affect plant growth directly but greatly influenced the compensatory capacity of Centaurea maculosa to root herbivory. Under high nitrogen conditions, shoot biomass of plants infested by the weevil was reduced by 30% compared with uninfested plants. However, under poor nitrogen conditions a 63% reduction was observed compared with corresponding controls. Root herbivory was the most important stress factor affecting plant physiology. Besides a relative increase in biomass allocation to the roots, infested plants also showed a significant increase in nitrogen concentration in the roots and a concomitant reduction in leaf nitrogen concentration, reflecting a redirection of the nitrogen to the stronger sink. The level of fructans was greatly reduced in the roots after herbivore feeding. This is thought to be a consequence of their mobilisation to support compensatory root growth. A preliminary model linking the effects of these root herbivores to the physiological processes of C. maculosa is presented.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centaurea maculosa; Compensatory responses; Insect root herbivory; Plant competition; Resource allocation

Year:  1992        PMID: 28313386     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Herbivory simulations in ecological research.

Authors:  I T Baldwin
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Effects of root herbivory by an insect on a foliar-feeding species, mediated through changes in the host plant.

Authors:  A C Gange; V K Brown
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of simulated root herbivory and fertilizer application on growth and biomass allocation in the clonal perennialSolidago canadensis.

Authors:  B Schmid; S L Miao; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The effects of chrysomelid beetle grazing and plant competition on the growth of Rumex obtusifolius.

Authors:  D A Cottam; J B Whittaker; A J C Malloch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Structural analysis of the phytophagous insect guilds associated with the roots of Centaurea maculosa Lam. C. diffusa Lam., and C. vallesiaca Jordan in Europe: : I. Field observations.

Authors:  Heinz Müller
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Alterations in leaf carbohydrate metabolism in response to nitrogen stress.

Authors:  T W Rufty; S C Huber; R J Volk
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 8.340

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  Effects of competition, herbivory and substrate disturbance on growth and size structure in pin cherry (Prunus pensylvanica L.) seedlings.

Authors:  Alan B Shabel; David R Peart
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Herbivory below ground and biological weed control: life history of a root-boring weevil on purple loosestrife.

Authors:  Bernd Blossey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Brassica plant responses to mild herbivore stress elicited by two specialist insects from different feeding guilds.

Authors:  P Sotelo; E Pérez; A Najar-Rodriguez; A Walter; S Dorn
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Drought negates growth stimulation due to root herbivory in pasture grasses.

Authors:  Kirk L Barnett; Scott N Johnson; Sally A Power
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effectiveness of management interventions used to control ragwort species.

Authors:  P D Roberts; A S Pullin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Additive effects of aboveground and belowground herbivores on the dominance of spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe).

Authors:  David G Knochel; Nathan D Monson; Timothy R Seastedt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Additive effects of genotype, nutrient availability and type of tissue damage on the compensatory response of Salix planifolia ssp. planifolia to simulated herbivory.

Authors:  Gilles Houle; Geneviève Simard
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Allocating nitrogen away from a herbivore: a novel compensatory response to root herbivory.

Authors:  Beth A Newingham; Ragan M Callaway; Hormoz Bassirirad
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Spatial heterogeneity in root litter and soil legacies differentially affect legume root traits.

Authors:  Sirgi Saar; Marina Semchenko; Janna M Barel; Gerlinde B De Deyn
Journal:  Plant Soil       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.192

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.