Literature DB >> 28313380

The capacity of a Myrmica ant nest to support a predacious species of Maculinea butterfly.

J A Thomas1, J C Wardlaw1.   

Abstract

Caterpillars of Maculinea arion are obligate predators of the brood of Myrmica sabuleti ants. In the aboratory, caterpillars eat the largest available ant larvae, although eggs, small larvae and prepupae are also palatable. This is an efficient way to predate. It ensures that newly-adopted caterpillars consume the final part of the first cohort of ant brood in a nest, before this pupates in early autumn and becomes unavailable as prey. At the same time, the fixed number of larvae in the second cohort is left to grow larger before being killed in late autumn and spring. Caterpillars also improve their feeding efficiency by hibernating for longer than ants in spring, losing just 6% of their weight while the biomass of ant larvae increases by 27%. Final instar caterpillars acquire more than 99% of their ultimate biomass in Myrmica nests, growing from 1.3 mg to an estimated 173 mg. A close correlation was found between the weights of caterpillars throughout autumn and the number of large ant larvae they had eaten. This was used to calculate the number of larvae eaten in spring, allowing both for the loss of caterpillar weight during winter and the increase in the size of their prey in spring. It is estimated that 230 of the largest available larvae, and a minimum nest size of 354 M. sabuleti workers, is needed to support one butterfly. Few wild M. sabuleti nests are this large: on one site, it was estimated that 85% of nests were too small to produce a butterfly, and only 5% could support two or more. This prediction was confirmed by the mortalities of 376 caterpillars in 151 wild M. sabuleti nests there. Mortalities were particularly high in nests that adopted more than two caterpillars, apparently due to scramble competition and starvation in autumn. Survival was higher than predicted in wild nests that adopted one caterpillar. These caterpillars seldom exhaust their food before spring, when there is intense competition among Myrmica for nest sites. Ants often desert their nests in the absence of brood, leaving the caterpillar behind. Vacant nests are frequently repopulated by a neighbouring colony, carrying in a fresh supply of brood. Maculinea arion caterpillars have an exceptional ability to withstand starvation, and sometimes survive to parasitize more than one Myrmica colony. Despite these adaptations, predation is an inefficient way to exploit the resources of a Myrmica nest. By contrast, Maculinea rebeli feeds mainly at a lower trophic level, on the regurgitations of worker ants. Published data show that Myrmica nests can support 6 times more caterpillars of Maculinea rebeli than of M. arion in the laboratory. This is confirmed by field data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Butterfly/ant relationships; Carrying capacity; Maculinea; Myrmica; Scramble competition

Year:  1992        PMID: 28313380     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  2 in total

1.  The effect of queen ants on the survival of Maculinea arion larvae in Myrmica ant nests.

Authors:  J A Thomas; J C Wardlaw
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests.

Authors:  J A Thomas; G W Elmes; J C Wardlaw; M Woyciechowski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.225

  2 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  Defences against brood parasites from a social immunity perspective.

Authors:  S C Cotter; D Pincheira-Donoso; R Thorogood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Patterns of host use by brood parasitic Maculinea butterflies across Europe.

Authors:  András Tartally; Jeremy A Thomas; Christian Anton; Emilio Balletto; Francesca Barbero; Simona Bonelli; Markus Bräu; Luca Pietro Casacci; Sándor Csősz; Zsolt Czekes; Matthias Dolek; Izabela Dziekańska; Graham Elmes; Matthias A Fürst; Uta Glinka; Michael E Hochberg; Helmut Höttinger; Vladimir Hula; Dirk Maes; Miguel L Munguira; Martin Musche; Per Stadel Nielsen; Piotr Nowicki; Paula S Oliveira; László Peregovits; Sylvia Ritter; Birgit C Schlick-Steiner; Josef Settele; Marcin Sielezniew; David J Simcox; Anna M Stankiewicz; Florian M Steiner; Giedrius Švitra; Line V Ugelvig; Hans Van Dyck; Zoltán Varga; Magdalena Witek; Michal Woyciechowski; Irma Wynhoff; David R Nash
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Differences in phenology, daily timing of activity, and associations of temperature utilization with survival in three threatened butterflies.

Authors:  Markus Franzén; Yannick Francioli; John Askling; Oskar Kindvall; Victor Johansson; Anders Forsman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Changes in chemical signature and host specificity from larval retrieval to full social integration in the myrmecophilous butterfly Maculinea rebeli.

Authors:  K Schönrogge; J C Wardlaw; A J Peters; S Everett; J A Thomas; G W Elmes
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Polymorphic growth in larvae of Maculinea butterflies, as an example of biennialism in myrmecophilous insects.

Authors:  Magdalena Witek; Ewa B Sliwinska; Piotr Skórka; Piotr Nowicki; Josef Settele; Michal Woyciechowski
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Relative importance of density-dependent regulation and environmental stochasticity for butterfly population dynamics.

Authors:  Piotr Nowicki; Simona Bonelli; Francesca Barbero; Emilio Balletto
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Variation in butterfly larval acoustics as a strategy to infiltrate and exploit host ant colony resources.

Authors:  Marco Sala; Luca Pietro Casacci; Emilio Balletto; Simona Bonelli; Francesca Barbero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Microbiome of the Maculinea-Myrmica Host-Parasite Interaction.

Authors:  Marco Di Salvo; Matteo Calcagnile; Adelfia Talà; Salvatore Maurizio Tredici; Massimo E Maffei; Karsten Schönrogge; Francesca Barbero; Pietro Alifano
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Ectoparasitic fungi of Myrmica ants alter the success of parasitic butterflies.

Authors:  András Tartally; Norbert Szabó; Anna Ágnes Somogyi; Ferenc Báthori; Danny Haelewaters; András Mucsi; Ágnes Fürjes-Mikó; David R Nash
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.