Literature DB >> 28313339

Comparative investigations into the feeding ecology of six Mantodea species.

Margit Reitze1, Wolfgang Nentwig1.   

Abstract

Six mantid species (Sphodromantis viridis, Polyspilota aeruginosa, Hierodula unimaculata, Parasphendale agrionia, Mantis religiosa and Empusa pennata) were studied in laboratory feeding experiments. Mantids stalk their prey and pounce on it, grasping it with their forelegs. Only living prey is selected and it is consumed directly after the catch. The predator orients itself optically, and therefore only takes notice of moving prey. The maximum size of prey which mantids can overwhelm is species-specific and depends on the prey type. On average mantids eat crickets of 50% their own body-weight while cockroaches can weigh up to 110%. Feeding experiments with 101 species of potential prey of 21 invertebrate orders showed an average feeding rate of 70% and marked differences among the predators. Polyspilota proved to be the least specialized mantid and Empusa caught the smallest amount of prey. Most of the defence mechanisms which arthropods have developed against their enemies proved to be ineffective against mantids. Neither a hard chitinous exoskeleton nor poisonous substances prevented the mantids from attacking their prey successfully. The protective secretion of the cotton stainer Dysdercus intermedius proved to be effective at least in a few instances. Even though these bugs were killed, the mantids usually refused to eat the abdomen, where the glands that produce the protective secretion are to be found. Thanatosis, as exhibited by the chrysomelid Cassida viridis and by the phasmid Carausius morosus, proved to be the best protection against mantids.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical defence; Generalist; Mechanical defence; Predator; Size

Year:  1991        PMID: 28313339     DOI: 10.1007/BF00318324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  3 in total

1.  Foraging strategy of a mantid, Paratenodera angustipennis S.: Mechanisms of switching tactics between ambush and active search.

Authors:  Tamiji Inoue; Toshiaki Marsura
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Responses to starvation in a mantis, Paratenodera angustipennis (S.).

Authors:  Toshiaki Matsura
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Feeding behaviour of the praying mantis: a learned modification.

Authors:  A Gelperin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1968-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Contrasting effects of aquatic subsidies on a terrestrial trophic cascade.

Authors:  Nadin Graf; Roman Bucher; Ralf B Schäfer; Martin H Entling
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Young fire ant workers feign death and survive aggressive neighbors.

Authors:  Deby L Cassill; Kim Vo; Brandie Becker
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-04-05

3.  Aversive Learning in the Praying Mantis (Tenodera aridifolia), a Sit and Wait Predator.

Authors:  Thomas Carle; Rio Horiwaki; Anya Hurlbert; Yoshifumi Yamawaki
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 1.309

4.  The hindgut microbiota of praying mantids is highly variable and includes both prey-associated and host-specific microbes.

Authors:  Kara A Tinker; Elizabeth A Ottesen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sexual differences in weaponry and defensive behavior in a neotropical harvestman.

Authors:  Júlio M G Segovia; Gabriel P Murayama; Rodrigo H Willemart
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Non-consumptive predator effects shape honey bee foraging and recruitment dancing.

Authors:  Allison Bray; James Nieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Neurons of self-defence: neuronal innervation of the exocrine defence glands in stick insects.

Authors:  Konrad Stolz; Christoph-Rüdiger von Bredow; Yvette M von Bredow; Reinhard Lakes-Harlan; Tina E Trenczek; Johannes Strauß
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 3.172

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.