Literature DB >> 28313338

On the opportunity cost of the photosynthate invested in stem elongation reactions mediated by phytochrome.

C L Ballaré1, A L Scopel1, R A Sánchez1.   

Abstract

Seedlings of shade-intolerant species react to alterations of the light climate caused by their neighbors with morphological changes that may influence the pattern of resource acquisition and utilization at the whole-canopy level. One such change, the increased stem elongation rate that is triggered by low red (R, 660 nm) to far-red (FR, 730 nm) ratios (R:FR) in dense canopies, might reduce the amount of assimilates available for leaf area expansion or root growth, and in that way affect resource capture by the canopy. We have tested this hypothesis by comparing the growth of both isolated individuals and canopies of the weed Amaranthus quitensis under conditions differing only in the spectral distribution of the incident light. When canopies received the full spectrum of sunlight, the stems were a large proportion (40-57%) of total biomass. Filtering the FR waveband (and hence raising the R:FR ratio to eliminate the neighbors' proximity-signal) resulted in shorter canopies with lighter stems. However, the growth of leaves and roots was not promoted by this treatment, indicating that the opportunity cost of the assimilates invested in the stems was nil or very small. Filtering the FR had no effect on biomass accumulation when plants were grown as isolated individuals. The higher growth of the canopics under full spectrum could be due to a higher light interception or to a higher efficiency of light conversion into biomass. The first possibility is weakened by the observation that filtering the FR had no effect on the dynamics of soil covering by the crops. The second is indirectly strengthened by results of an experiment with isolated plants showing that stem elongation, stem growth, and total plant biomass can be increased by reducing the flux of R light received by the stems without affecting the light climate of the leaves. Further work is needed to distinguish between these two possibilities; whatever the cause, our results show that the elongation responses to decreased R:FR may lead to a net increase in canopy productivity, and do not necessarily have a negative impact on the growth of resource-harvesting organs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canopies; Competition; Light quality; Photosynthate partitioning; Phytochrome

Year:  1991        PMID: 28313338     DOI: 10.1007/BF00318323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Morphology and Photosynthetic Efficiency of Tobacco Leaves That Received End-of-Day Red and Far Red Light during Development.

Authors:  M J Kasperbauer; D E Peaslee
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Promotion of sink activity of developing rose shoots by light.

Authors:  Y Mor; A H Halevy
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies.

Authors:  C L Ballaré; A L Scopel; R A Sánchez
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-01-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Rapid photomodulation of stem extension in light-grownSinapis alba L. : Studies on kinetics, site of perception and photoreceptor.

Authors:  D C Morgan; T O'Brien; H Smith
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Morphological responses of Datura ferox L. seedlings to the presence of neighbours : Their relationships with canopy microclimate.

Authors:  C L Ballaré; R A Sánchez; Ana L Scopel; C M Ghersa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  How portulaca seedlings avoid their neighbours.

Authors:  Ariel Novoplansky; Dan Cohen; Tsvi Sachs
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The effect of grasses on the quality of transmitted radiation and its influence on the growth of white clover Trifolium repens.

Authors:  Lindsey Thompson; John L Harper
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Light and Shade Effects on Abscission and C-Photoassimilate Partitioning among Reproductive Structures in Soybean.

Authors:  J C Heindl; W A Brun
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Photomodulation of axis extension in sparse canopies : role of the stem in the perception of light-quality signals of stand density.

Authors:  C L Ballaré; A L Scopel; R A Sánchez
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Sensitivity to far-red radiation in stomata of Phaseolus vulgaris L.: Rhythmic effects on conductance and photosynthesis.

Authors:  M G Holmes; J C Sager; W H Klein
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.116

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effects of flood-influenced factors on seed germination of Ambrosia tenuifolia.

Authors:  Pedro Insausti; Alberto Soriano; Rodolfo A Sanchez
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Competing neighbors: light perception and root function.

Authors:  Pedro E Gundel; Ronald Pierik; Liesje Mommer; Carlos L Ballaré
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Tree litter and forest understorey vegetation: a conceptual framework to understand the effects of tree litter on a perennial geophyte, Anemone nemorosa.

Authors:  Marie Baltzinger; Frédéric Archaux; Yann Dumas
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Shade avoidance.

Authors:  Jorge J Casal
Journal:  Arabidopsis Book       Date:  2012-01-19

5.  Out of sight but not out of mind: alternative means of communication in plants.

Authors:  Monica Gagliano; Michael Renton; Nili Duvdevani; Matthew Timmins; Stefano Mancuso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reducing shade avoidance responses in a cereal crop.

Authors:  Wibke Wille; Christian B Pipper; Eva Rosenqvist; Sven B Andersen; Jacob Weiner
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 3.276

7.  Light affects tissue patterning of the hypocotyl in the shade-avoidance response.

Authors:  Esther Botterweg-Paredes; Anko Blaakmeer; Shin-Young Hong; Bin Sun; Lorenzo Mineri; Valdeko Kruusvee; Yakun Xie; Daniel Straub; Delphine Ménard; Edouard Pesquet; Stephan Wenkel
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Turning plant interactions upside down: Light signals from below matter.

Authors:  Ningyi Zhang; Jochem B Evers; Niels P R Anten; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 7.228

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.