Literature DB >> 28313336

Responses of pocket gophers (Thomomys bottae) to changes in diet quality.

S C Loeb1, R G Schwab1, M W Demment2.   

Abstract

We examined digestibility of dry matter, nutrients, and fiber, and food intake, metabolic fecal losses, weight change, and gut size of pocket gophers (Thomomys bottae) in relation to diet quality in the laboratory. Pocket gophers were maintained for 15-20 days on one of seven diets which contained from 18% to 56% neutral detergent fiber (NDF). NDF content of the diet was an excellent predictor of diet quality. Digestibility of dry matter, NDF, and nitrogen all decreased with increasing NDF content of the diet. In general, pocket gophers compensated for low diet quality by increasing dry matter intake, but those given high quality forage before the lowest quality diet reduced their intake. Thus, the response of pocket gophers to low quality diets may depend on their body condition. Because increased food intake resulted in increased total metabolic fecal losses and metabolic fecal nitrogen losses, decreasing food intake on low-quality diets may be advantageous. A further response of pocket gophers to decreased food quality was an increase in size of cecum and large intestine, suggesting that fermentation of cell walls became increasingly important as diet quality decreased.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diet quality; Digestibility; Food intake; Gut size; Herbivory

Year:  1991        PMID: 28313336     DOI: 10.1007/BF00318321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  REGULATION OF FOOD INTAKE IN RUMINANTS. 1. PELLETED RATIONS VARYING IN ENERGY CONCENTRATION.

Authors:  M J MONTGOMERY; B R BAUMGARDT
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Effect of dilution of the diet with an indigestible filler on feed intake in the mouse.

Authors:  D C DALTON
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The importance of a relative shortage of food in animal ecology.

Authors:  T C R White
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Burrow structure and foraging costs in the fossorial rodent, Thomomys bottae.

Authors:  D Vleck
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Comparative digestibility of acid detergent fiber by laboratory albino and wild Polynesian rats.

Authors:  M V Garrison; R L Reid; P Fawley; C P Breidenstein
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 6.  Control of feed intake and regulation of energy balance in ruminants.

Authors:  C A Baile; J M Forbes
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Influence of level of energy demand on the ability of rats to compensate for diet dilution.

Authors:  A D Peterson; B R Baumgardt
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Effects of dietary fiber levels on weight gain, cecal volume and volatile fatty acid production in rabbits.

Authors:  W H Hoover; R N Heitmann
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Meadow vole nutrition studies with semisynthetic diets.

Authors:  J S Shenk; F C Elliott; J W Thomas
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1970-12       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 10.  The energetic efficiency of metabolism.

Authors:  A J Webster
Journal:  Proc Nutr Soc       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.297

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dynamic digestive responses to increased energy demands in the leaf-eared mouse (Phyllotis darwini).

Authors:  Daniel E Naya; Leonardo D Bacigalupe; Diego M Bustamante; F Bozinovic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  The allometry of rodent intestines.

Authors:  Barry G Lovegrove
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Efficiency of facultative frugivory in the nectar-feeding bat Glossophaga commissarisi: the quality of fruits as an alternative food source.

Authors:  Detlev H Kelm; Juliane Schaer; Sylvia Ortmann; Gudrun Wibbelt; John R Speakman; Christian C Voigt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.200

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.