Literature DB >> 28313197

Reduction of predation risk under the cover of darkness: Avoidance responses of mayfly larvae to a benthic fish.

Joseph M Culp1, Nancy E Glozier1, Garry J Scrimgeour1.   

Abstract

Mayfly larvae of Paraleptophlebia heteronea (McDunnough) had two antipredator responses to a nocturnal fish predator (Rhinichthys cataractae (Valenciennes)): flight into the drift and retreat into interstitial crevices. Drift rates of Paraleptophlebia abruptly increased by 30 fold when fish were actively foraging in the laboratory streams but, even before fish were removed, drift began returning to control levels because larvae settled to the substrate and moved to areas of low risk beneath stones. This drifting response was used as an immediate escape behavior which likely decreases risk of capture from predators which forage actively at night. Surprisingly, drift most often occurred before contact between predator and prey, and we suggest that in darkness this mayfly may use hydrodynamic pressure waves for predator detection, rather than chemical cues, since fish forage in an upstream direction. Although drifting may represent a cost to mayfly larvae in terms of relocation to a new foraging area with unknown food resources, the immediate mortality risk probably out-weighs the importance of staying within a profitable food patch because larvae can survive starvation for at least 2 d. In addition to drifting, mayflies retreated from upper, exposed substrate surfaces to concealed interstitial crevices immediately after a predator encounter, or subsequent to resettlement on the substrate after predator-induced drift. A latency period was associated with this response and mayflies remained in these concealed locations for at least 3 h after dace foraging ceased. Because this mayfly feeds at night and food levels are significantly lower in field refugia under stones, relative to exposed stone surfaces, predator avoidance activity may limit foraging time and, ultimately, reduce the food intake of this stream mayfly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral response; Fish; Mayfly; Predation risk; Streams

Year:  1991        PMID: 28313197     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands?

Authors:  A Sih
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The importance of predation, substrate and spatial refugia in determining lotic insect distributions.

Authors:  Alexander S Flecker; J David Allan
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Balancing risks? Responses and non-responses of mayfly larvae to fish and stonefly predators.

Authors:  Daniel A Soluk; Nicholas C Collins
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Complex predator-prey interactions and predator intimidation among crayfish, piscivorous fish, and small benthic fish.

Authors:  Frank J Rahel; Roy A Stein
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Stream drift as a consequence of disturbance by invertebrate predators : Field and laboratory experiments.

Authors:  B Malmqvist; P Sjöström
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Predator detection and avoidance by lotic mayfly nymphs of different size.

Authors:  Pertii Tikkanen; Timo Muotka; Arto Huhta
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The relative importance of refugia in determining the drift and habitat selection of predaceous stoneflies in a sandy-bottomed stream.

Authors:  Russell B Rader; J V McArthur
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Effects of trout on the diel periodicity of drifting in baetid mayflies.

Authors:  Paul L Douglas; Graham E Forrester; Scott D Cooper
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Unpredictable movement as an anti-predator strategy.

Authors:  Graham Richardson; Patrick Dickinson; Oliver H P Burman; Thomas W Pike
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Feeding while evading predators by a lotic mayfly: linking short-term foraging behaviours to long-term fitness consequences.

Authors:  Garry J Scrimgeour; Joseph M Culp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.