Effects of light and nutrient availability on dry matter and N allocation in six successional grassland species : Testing for resource ratio effects.

Recent discussions on determinants of competitive success during succession require the study of the combined effect of light and nutrient availability on growth and allocation. These effects can be used to predict the outcome of competition at changing resource availabilities. This work is part of a study on the successional sequence in permanent grassland starting after fertilizer application is stopped, but with continued mowing, in order to restore former species-rich communities. This yields a successional sequence which proceeds from grasslands with a high nutrient availability and a closed canopy, to grasslands with a low nutrient availability and an open canopy. If allocation is related to competitive ability, species from the productive stages would be expected to allocate more biomass and nitrogen to leaves, which could make them better competitors for light, while species from the unproductive stages would allocate more biomass to roots, which could make them better nutrient competitors. This study reports on growth, specific leaf area (SLA), vertical display of leaves, and allocation of biomass and nitrogen of six grassland species from this successional sequence at 16 combinations of light and nutrient supply. Species from the poorer successional stages reached a lower final dry weight than species from the richer stages, over all treatment combinations. The experimental design made it possible to test for unique effects of the resource ratio effect of light and nutrients on allocation characteristics. This resource-ratio effect was defined as the ratio light intensity/(light intensity + nutrient supply rate), using standardized levels for the treatments. The within-species variation (plasticity) in both allocation of dry matter and nitrogen was linearly related to this resource-ratio effect. Some interspecific differences in this relationship were found which could be related to the position of the species along the successional gradient. However, the range of plasticity in allocation pattern expressed within each species was much larger than the differences between species. It was concluded that allocation differences between these grassland species are relatively unimportant, given the large amount of plasticity in these traits. Interspecific differences in SLA and vertical stature seemed to be more important in explaining the position of species along the successional gradient.