Literature DB >> 28313029

Density-dependent habitat selection in muskrats: a test of the ideal free distribution model.

F Messier1, J A Virgl1, L Marinelli1.   

Abstract

Two predictions of the ideal free distribution model, a null hypothesis of habitat selection, were examined using free-ranging muskrats. We rejected the prediction that the proportion of the animals found in each of five habitats was independent of population size. Data on over-winter occupancy of muskrat dwellings tend also to refute the prediction of equal fitness reward among habitats. Habitat type and water-level had a profound effect on the suitability of a site for settlement. We concluded that the observed pattern of muskrat distribution followed more closely an ideal despotic distribution where some individuals benefited from a higher fitness because of resource monopolization. Current theories of density-dependent habitat selection, which assume an ideal free distribution, would not apply to muskrats and possibly to many other mammal species.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Habitat selection; Ideal free distribution; Muskrat; Ondatra zibethicus; Spatial distribution

Year:  1990        PMID: 28313029     DOI: 10.1007/BF00329763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  1 in total

1.  Factors Limiting Higher Vertebrate Populations.

Authors:  P L Errington
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Ideal free distribution and natal dispersal in female roe deer.

Authors:  L Kjell Walhström; Petter Kjellander
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Density-dependent habitat selection by brown-headed cowbirds ( Molothrus ater) in tallgrass prairie.

Authors:  William E Jensen; Jack F Cully
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Summer Precipitation Predicts Spatial Distributions of Semiaquatic Mammals.

Authors:  Adam A Ahlers; Lisa A Cotner; Patrick J Wolff; Mark A Mitchell; Edward J Heske; Robert L Schooley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.