Literature DB >> 28312984

Sensitivity to larval density in populations of Drosophila mojavensis: Influences of host plant variation on components of fitness.

W J Etges1, W B Heed1.   

Abstract

Chromosomally polymorphic populations of Drosophila mojavensis from Baja California feed and breed on agria cactus, Stenocereus gummosus; whereas, monomorphic Arizona populations are associated exclusively with organ pipe cactus, S. thurberi. The effects of this host plant shift in expanding the kinds of feeding and breeding sites were assessed by manipulating larval density and recording differences in egg to adult development time and viability, and adult thorax size in both populations on artificially rotted substrates of both cactus species. Older agria rots increased development time but had no effect on viability. Organ pipe rots were qualitatively poorer substrates than agria rots for both monomorphic and polymorphic populations of D. mojavensis, especially at higher larval densities causing longer egg to adult development times, lower viabilities, and smaller thorax sizes than agria.The Baja population expressed shorter development times, higher viabilities, and smaller thorax sizes than the Arizona population on both cactus substrates. No evidence for cactus host race formation was found. The Baja population was less sensitive to increasing larval densities for all fitness characters studied on both cactus substrates indicating greater developmental homeostasis than in the monomorphic Arizona population. These data support the hypothesized central-marginal population structure within this species coincident with the distribution of host plants and lend insight into the process of adaptive divergence at different life history stages caused by host plant shifts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental homeostasis; Drosophila; Host-plant-shift; Polymorphism; Stenocereus

Year:  1987        PMID: 28312984     DOI: 10.1007/BF00378710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Negative correction between rate of development and female fertility in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Y HIRAIZUMI
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic conditions which promote or retard the formation of species.

Authors:  H L CARSON
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1959

3.  The adaptations of populations to varying environments.

Authors:  R C LEWONTIN
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1957

4.  Studies in quantitative inheritance. XI. Genetic and environmental correlation between body size and egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. 1957.

Authors:  Forbes W Robertson
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.166

5.  GENIC DIFFERENTIATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE EARLY STAGES OF SPECIATON IN THE MULLERI SUBGROUP OF DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  E Zouros
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION IN NATURAL AND EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA AND DROSOPHILA PERSIMILIS.

Authors:  Alexander Sokoloff
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Comparisons of yeast florae from natural substrates and larval guts of southwestern Drosophila.

Authors:  James C Fogleman; William T Starmer; William B Heed
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Selection for rate of development and gene arrangement frequencies in Drosophila persimilis. II. Fitness properties at equilibrium.

Authors:  E B Spiess; L D Spiess
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Larval selectivity for yeast species by Drosophila mojavensis in natural substrates.

Authors:  J C Fogleman; W T Starmer; W B Heed
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The role of phytosterols in host plant utilization by cactophilicDrosophila.

Authors:  J C Fogleman; S M Duperret; H W Kircher
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 1.880

View more
  11 in total

1.  Superparasitism of larval hosts by the walnut fly, Rhagoletis juglandis, and its implications for female and offspring performance.

Authors:  César R Nufio; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Epicuticular hydrocarbon variation in Drosophila mojavensis cluster species.

Authors:  W J Etges; L L Jackson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Deciphering life history transcriptomes in different environments.

Authors:  William J Etges; Meredith V Trotter; Cássia C de Oliveira; Subhash Rajpurohit; Allen G Gibbs; Shripad Tuljapurkar
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Ecological aspects of cactus triterpene glycosides I. Their effect on fitness components ofDrosophila mojavensis.

Authors:  J C Fugleman; L Armstrong
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. VII. Effects of larval dietary fatty acids on adult epicuticular hydrocarbons.

Authors:  William J Etges; Christi L Veenstra; Larry L Jackson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.793

6.  Male-specific transfer and fine scale spatial differences of newly identified cuticular hydrocarbons and triacylglycerides in a Drosophila species pair.

Authors:  Joanne Y Yew; Klaus Dreisewerd; Cássia Cardoso de Oliveira; William J Etges
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Performance of host-races of the fruit fly, Tephritis conura on a derived host plant, the cabbage thistle Cirsium oleraceum: implications for the original host shift.

Authors:  Thorsten Diegisser; Jes Johannesen; Alfred Seitz
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.857

8.  Population differences in host plant preference and the importance of yeast and plant substrate to volatile composition.

Authors:  Priya Date; Amber Crowley-Gall; Aaron F Diefendorf; Stephanie M Rollmann
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Genomic analysis of the four ecologically distinct cactus host populations of Drosophila mojavensis.

Authors:  Carson W Allan; Luciano M Matzkin
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Behavioral evolution accompanying host shifts in cactophilic Drosophila larvae.

Authors:  Joshua M Coleman; Kyle M Benowitz; Alexandra G Jost; Luciano M Matzkin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.