Literature DB >> 28312840

Genetically-based variation between two spider populations in foraging behavior.

Ann V Hedrick1,2, Susan E Riechert1,2.   

Abstract

Optimal foraging theory is based on the assumption that at least some aspects of foraging behavior are genetically determined (Pyke et al. 1977; Kamil and Sargent 1980; Pyke 1984). Nonetheless, very few studies have examined the role of genetics in foraging behavior. Here, we report on geographical differences in the foraging behavior of a spider (Agelenopsis aperta) and investigate whether these differences are genetically determined. Field studies were conducted on two different populations of A. aperta: one residing in a desert riparian habitat, and the other in a desert grassland habitat. Data from the spiders' natural encounters with prey demonstrated that grassland spiders exhibited a higher frequency of attack than riparian spiders towards 13 of 15 prey types, including crickets and ants. Grassland spiders also had shorter latencies to attack 12 of 15 prey types, including crickets and ants, than riparian spiders. Subsequently, we reared grassland and riparian spiders under controlled conditions in the laboratory and observed their interactions with prey to determine whether the populational differences we found in the field could be genetic. Again, grassland spiders showed a shorter latency to attack prey (crickets, ants) than riparian spiders. These latencies were not significantly affected by the hunger state or age of the spiders. Finally, we reared a second generation (F2) of grassland and riparian spiders in the laboratory and observed their interactions with prey to determine whether the populational differences in the previous generation were due to genetic effects or maternal effects. As before, grassland spiders exhibited a shorter latency to attack prey (crickets) than riparian spiders. We conclude that the foraging differences we observed between these two populations of A. aperta are genetically determined. These differences probably have resulted from either natural selection acting directly on attack frequency and the latency to attack prey, or natural selection acting on traits which are genetically correlated with these aspects of foraging behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral genetics; Foraging behavior; Population variation; Spiders

Year:  1989        PMID: 28312840     DOI: 10.1007/BF00380078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands?

Authors:  A Sih
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  BEHAVIORAL VARIATION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS. II. THE INHERITANCE OF A FEEDING RESPONSE IN CROSSES BETWEEN GEOGRAPHIC RACES OF THE GARTER SNAKE, THAMNOPHIS ELEGANS.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  BEHAVIORAL VARIATION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS. I. PHENOTYPIC, GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CORRELATIONS BETWEEN CHEMORECEPTIVE RESPONSES TO PREY IN THE GARTER SNAKE, THAMNOPHIS ELEGANS.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer.

Authors:  R G O'Brien; M K Kaiser
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components.

Authors:  T A Mousseau; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Complex foraging polymorphism in bluegill sunfish.

Authors:  T J Ehlinger; D S Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Studies on the genetics of feeding behaviour in the cave fish Astyanax mexicanus f. anoptichthys. An example of apparent monofactorial inheritance by polygenes.

Authors:  C Schemmel
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1980
  7 in total
  8 in total

1.  Cross-habitat variation in the phenology of a colonial spider: insights from a reciprocal transplant study.

Authors:  Florencia Fernández Campón
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2010-03

2.  Behavioural hypervolumes of spider communities predict community performance and disbandment.

Authors:  Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Factors affecting the reproductive success of the crab spider Misumenoides formosipes: the covariance between juvenile and adult traits.

Authors:  Michael W Beck; Edward F Connor
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Resting networks and personality predict attack speed in social spiders.

Authors:  Edmund R Hunt; Brian Mi; Rediet Geremew; Camila Fernandez; Brandyn M Wong; Jonathan N Pruitt; Noa Pinter-Wollman
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  The Effect of Keystone Individuals on Collective Outcomes Can Be Mediated through Interactions or Behavioral Persistence.

Authors:  Noa Pinter-Wollman; Carl N Keiser; Roy Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Participation in cooperative prey capture and the benefits gained from it are associated with individual personality.

Authors:  James L L Lichtenstein; Colin M Wright; Lauren P Luscuskie; Graham A Montgomery; Noa Pinter-Wollman; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.624

7.  Smaller and bolder prey snails have higher survival in staged encounters with the sea star Pisaster giganteus.

Authors:  William C Foster; Connor M Armstrong; Gregory T Chism; Jonathan N Pruitt
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Exposure to cuticular bacteria can alter host behavior in a funnel-weaving spider.

Authors:  Olivia B Parks; Krishna S Kothamasu; Michael J Ziemba; Morgan Benner; Madison Cristinziano; Serena Kantz; Daniel Leger; John Li; Devanshi Patel; William Rabuse; Samantha Sutton; Amandi Wilson; Priyanka Baireddy; Aditi A Kamat; Mariah J Callas; Matthew J Borges; Marysa N Scalia; Emily Klenk; Gabrielle Scherer; Maria M Martinez; Sarah R Grubb; Nancy Kaufmann; Jonathan N Pruitt; Carl N Keiser
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.624

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.