Literature DB >> 28312811

Comparative responses of the Savanna grasses Cenchrus ciliaris and Themeda triandra to defoliation.

K C Hodgkinson1, M M Ludlow2, J J Mott2, Z Baruch2.   

Abstract

Two perennial tussock grasses of savannas were compared in a glasshouse study to determine why they differed in their ability to withstand frequent, heavy grazing; Cenchrus ciliaris is tolerant and Themeda triandra is intolerant of heavy grazing. Frequent defoliation at weekly intervals for six weeks reduced shoot biomass production over a subsequent 42 day regrowth period compared with previously undefoliated plants (infrequent) in T. triandra, but not in C. ciliaris. Leaf area of T. triandra expanded rapidly following defoliation but high initial relative growth rates of shoots were not sustained after 14 days of regrowth because of reducing light utilising efficiency of leaves. Frequently defoliated plants were slower in rate of leaf area expansion and this was associated with reduced photosynthetic capacity of newly formed leaves, lower allocation of photosynthate to leaves but not lower tiller numbers. T. triandra appears well adapted to a regime where defoliation is sufficiently infrequent to allow carbon to be fixed to replace that used in initial leaf area expansion. In contrast, C. ciliaris is better adapted to frequent defoliation than is T. triandra, because horizontally orientated nodal tillers are produced below the defoliation level. This morphological adaptation resulted in a 10-fold higher leaf area remaining after defoliation compared with similarly defoliated T. triandra, which together with the maintenance of moderate levels of light utilising efficiency, contributed to the higher leaf area and shoot weight throughout the regrowth period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cenchrus ciliaris; Grazing; Savanna grasses; Shoot regrowth; Themeda triandra

Year:  1989        PMID: 28312811     DOI: 10.1007/BF00378238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Some Quantitative Considerations in Iron Nutrition of Higher Plants.

Authors:  J J Oertli; L Jacobson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1960-09       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Responses of an African graminoid (Themeda triandra Forsk.) to frequent defoliation, nitrogen, and water: a limit of adaptation to herbivory.

Authors:  M B Coughenour; S J McNaughton; L L Wallace
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A test of compensatory photosynthesis in the field: Implications for herbivory tolerance.

Authors:  R S Nowak; M M Caldwell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Coping with herbivory: Photosynthetic capacity and resource allocation in two semiarid Agropyron bunchgrasses.

Authors:  M M Caldwell; J H Richards; D A Johnson; R S Nowak; R S Dzurec
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Root growth response to defoliation in two Agropyron bunchgrasses: field observations with an improved root periscope.

Authors:  J H Richards
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Interactive effect of flooding and grazing on the growth of Serengeti grasses.

Authors:  M Oesterheld; S J McNaughton
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Responses to simulated herbivory and water stress in two tropical C4 grasses.

Authors:  Milton Simoes; Zdravko Baruch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Contribution of flexible allocation priorities to herbivory tolerance in C4 perennial grasses: an evaluation with 13C labeling.

Authors:  D D Briske; T W Boutton; Z Wang
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Survival, growth, and escape from herbivory are determined by habitat and herbivore species for three Australian woodland plants.

Authors:  Kimberly G Allcock; David S Hik
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.