Literature DB >> 28312790

Trap-nesting bees and wasps colonizing set-aside fields: succession and body size, management by cutting and sowing.

A Gathmann1, H-J Greiler1, T Tscharntke1.   

Abstract

Trap-nesting bees and wasps (Hymenoptera Aculeata) colonizing crop and fallow fields in an agricultural landscape were studied using 20 sown fields (pea, barley, rye, clover-grass mixtures, Phacelia tanacetifolia) and 20 fields with naturally developed vegetation (1- and 2-year old fields, both mown and unmown, and old meadows). Fourteen species of Apoidea, 4 of Sphecidae, 1 of Eumenidae and 4 of parasitoids were reared from reed nests exposed in these 40 fields of 10 field-types. Fields with naturally developed vegetation had twice as many species as sown fields, due to the distribution pattern of the 14 bee species, whereas the 9 predatory species (wasps and parasitoids) showed a rather uniform distribution. None of the trap-nesting bees were found in Phacelia fields, despite contrasting expectations of beekeepers. Old meadows showed a particularly high abundance and species richness, since only 10% of all traps were exposed, but 32% of all bee nests were sampled in old meadows, including 4 bee species that were not found elsewhere. Accordingly, species richness of fields with naturally developed vegetation showed a significant increase with age. Variability in Hymenoptera species numbers could be explained by corresponding differences in plant species numbers. The alternative hypothesis that field size or field connectivity influenced species richness was not supported. Habitats with great floral diversity appeared to offer better and richer food resources for the flower-visiting bees, whereas food availability apparently did not influence predatory wasps. The bees Osmia caerulescens and Megachile versicolor that had colonized early-successional fields took twice as long to provision cells as those that colonized late-successional meadows characterized by a greater plant species richness. In contrast, the eumenid wasp Ancistrocerus gazella took a similar period of time to provision cells in both field types. In addition, bee and wasp species of plant-species-poor fields were on average significantly larger than those of plant-species-rich fields. Thus, body size appeared to be a good predictor of colonization ability. Management by cutting greatly increased plant species richness in early-successional set-aside fields and thus doubled species richness of bees. Cutting of early-successional habitats can be expected to benefit insects and plants in general, whereas older grassland should show the greatest insect diversity when both mown and unmown parts are present.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body size; Colonization; Hymenoptera Aculeata; Set-aside; Succession

Year:  1994        PMID: 28312790     DOI: 10.1007/BF00326084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  1 in total

1.  Distributions of occupied and vacant butterfly habitats in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  C D Thomas; J A Thomas; M S Warren
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  1 in total
  7 in total

1.  Differential effects of habitat isolation and landscape composition on wasps, bees, and their enemies.

Authors:  Christof Schüepp; John D Herrmann; Felix Herzog; Martin H Schmidt-Entling
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Wild bees enhance honey bees' pollination of hybrid sunflower.

Authors:  Sarah S Greenleaf; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Average body length of arboreal and aerial beetle (Coleoptera) assemblages from remnant and plantation Eucalyptus forests in southwestern Australia.

Authors:  Saul A Cunningham; William Murray
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Compositional changes in bee and wasp communities along Neotropical mountain altitudinal gradient.

Authors:  Lucas Neves Perillo; Frederico de Siqueira Neves; Yasmine Antonini; Rogério Parentoni Martins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Fragmentation of nest and foraging habitat affects time budgets of solitary bees, their fitness and pollination services, depending on traits: Results from an individual-based model.

Authors:  Jeroen Everaars; Josef Settele; Carsten F Dormann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Determinants of spatial distribution in a bee community: nesting resources, flower resources, and body size.

Authors:  Anna Torné-Noguera; Anselm Rodrigo; Xavier Arnan; Sergio Osorio; Helena Barril-Graells; Léo Correia da Rocha-Filho; Jordi Bosch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Trap Nesting Wasps and Bees in Agriculture: A Comparison of Sown Wildflower and Fallow Plots in Florida.

Authors:  Joshua W Campbell; Cherice Smithers; Allyn Irvin; Chase B Kimmel; Cory Stanley-Stahr; Jaret C Daniels; James D Ellis
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.769

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.