Literature DB >> 28312688

The vectoring of cactophilic yeasts by Drosophila.

Philip F Ganter1.   

Abstract

At two locations in the Sonoran Desert, yeasts were sampled from species of Drosophila, the flies' cactus hosts, and other neighboring sources of cactophilic yeasts to determine the relation between the yeasts vectored by the fly and the yeasts found in their breeding sites. D. mojavensis, D. nigrospiracula, and D. mettleri vectored yeast assemblages significantly more similar to the yeast species found on the rot from which the flies were collected than to the yeasts found on other rots from the flies host cactus or other rotting cactus at the same site. Rots with Drosophila had fewer yeast species than those without flies, suggesting that flies were associated with younger rots. Rots with flies and the Drosophila also had more yeast species with the capability to produce ethyl acetate than rots without flies. The results support the contention that cactophilic Drosophila feed on a subset of the yeasts available in an area, and may act to maintain differences among the yeast communities found on different species of cactus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cactophilic yeasts; Community structure; Dispersal; Drosophila; Vectoring

Year:  1988        PMID: 28312688     DOI: 10.1007/BF00376943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Dispersal of yeasts and bacteria by Drosophila in a temperate forest.

Authors:  Donald G Gilbert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  A COMPARISON OF DROSOPHILA HABITATS ACCORDING TO THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ATTRIBUTES OF THE ASSOCIATED YEAST COMMUNITIES.

Authors:  William T Starmer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Comparisons of yeast florae from natural substrates and larval guts of southwestern Drosophila.

Authors:  James C Fogleman; William T Starmer; William B Heed
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Yeast communities from host plants and associated Drosophila in southern arizona: new isolations and analysis of the relative importance of hosts and vectors on comunity composition.

Authors:  Philip F Ganter; William T Starmer; Marc-Andre Lachance; Herman J Phaff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Coadaptation ofDrosophila and yeasts in their natural habitat.

Authors:  W T Starmer; J C Fogleman
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  The ecology of the yeast flora in necroticOpuntia cacti and of associatedDrosophila in Australia.

Authors:  J S Barker; P D East; H J Phaff; M Miranda
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Analysis of the community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. II.Opuntia species.

Authors:  W T Starmer; H J Phaff
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Analysis of the community structure of yeasts associated with the decaying stems of cactus. I.Stenocereus gummosus.

Authors:  W T Starmer
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.552

  8 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  The ecology of insect-yeast relationships and its relevance to human industry.

Authors:  Anne A Madden; Mary Jane Epps; Tadashi Fukami; Rebecca E Irwin; John Sheppard; D Magdalena Sorger; Robert R Dunn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Yeast communities as descriptors of habitat use by the Drosophila fasciola subgroup (repleta group) in Atlantic rain forests.

Authors:  P B Morais; C A Rosa; A N Hagler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Uncovering the Yeast Communities in Fungus-Growing Ant Colonies.

Authors:  Rodolfo Bizarria; Tatiane de Castro Pietrobon; Andre Rodrigues
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.192

4.  Yeast communities of diverse Drosophila species: comparison of two symbiont groups in the same hosts.

Authors:  James Angus Chandler; Jonathan A Eisen; Artyom Kopp
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Yeast communities of the cactus Pilosocereus arrabidae as resources for larval and adult stages of Drosophila serido.

Authors:  P B Morais; C A Rosa; A N Hagler; L C Mendonca-Hagler
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.271

6.  Differential attraction of drosophilids to banana baits inoculated with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Hanseniaspora uvarum within a Neotropical forest remnant.

Authors:  Marcos R D Batista; Fabiana Uno; Rafael D Chaves; Rosana Tidon; Carlos A Rosa; Louis B Klaczko
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Dietary Utilization Drives the Differentiation of Gut Bacterial Communities between Specialist and Generalist Drosophilid Flies.

Authors:  Jia-Syuan Chen; Shun-Chern Tsaur; Chau-Ti Ting; Shu Fang
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-07-11

8.  Drosophila regulate yeast density and increase yeast community similarity in a natural substrate.

Authors:  Judy A Stamps; Louie H Yang; Vanessa M Morales; Kyria L Boundy-Mills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Microbial Quantity Impacts Drosophila Nutrition, Development, and Lifespan.

Authors:  Erin S Keebaugh; Ryuichi Yamada; Benjamin Obadia; William B Ludington; William W Ja
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2018-06-08

10.  Protocol for Drosophila sleep deprivation using single-chip board.

Authors:  Xi Jin; Pengyu Gu; Junhai Han
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2021-09-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.