Literature DB >> 28312663

Ecophysiological consequences of non-random leaf orientation in the prairie compass plant, Silphium laciniatum.

Thomas W Jurik1, Hanzhong Zhang1, John M Pleasants1.   

Abstract

The prairie compass plant (Silphium laciniatum L.) has vertical leaves that are characteristically oriented in a north-south plane (i.e., the flat surfaces of the lamina face east and west). We explored the consequences of this orientation by determining basic photosynthetic and water use characteristics in response to environmental factors and by determining total daily photosynthesis and water use of leaves held in different orientations. Average maximum CO2 exchange rate (CER) of leaves near Ames, IA was constant at 22 micromol m-2 s-1 from May through August and then declined. CER did not exhibit a distinct lightsaturation point. CER at photon flux densities near full sunlight was constant from 22 to 35°C leaf temperature but declined at higher temperatures. However, leaf temperatures rarely exceed 35°C during the growing season. There was no change in the pattern of response of CER to temperature over the growing season. We constrained leaves to face east-west (EW,=natural), to face north-south (NS), or to be horizontal (HOR) on eight days in 1986-1988. EW leaves had the highest light interception, leaf temperatures, CER, and transpiration early and late in the day, whereas HOR leaves had the highest values in the middle of the day. Integrations of CER and transpiration over the eight daytime periods showed EW and HOR leaves to have equivalent carbon gain, higher than that of NS leaves. HOR leaves had the highest daily transpiration. Daily water use efficiency (WUE, carbon gained/water lost) was always highest in EW leaves, with the HOR leaves having 16% lower WUE and NS leaves having 33% lower WUE. The natural orientation of compass plant leaves results in equivalent or higher carbon gain and in increased WUE when compared to leaves with other possible orientations; this is likely to have a selective advantage in a prairie environment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compass plant; Leaf azimuth; Leaf inclination; Photosynthesis; Water use efficiency

Year:  1990        PMID: 28312663     DOI: 10.1007/BF00323533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Ontogeny of Photosynthetic Performance in Fragaria virginiana under Changing Light Regimes.

Authors:  T W Jurik; J F Chabot; B F Chabot
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Solar tracking by plants.

Authors:  J Ehleringer; I Forseth
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Drought and changes in leaf orientation for two California chaparral shrubs: Ceanothus megacarpus and Ceanothus crassifolius.

Authors:  J P Comstock; B E Mahall
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Short-Term Effects of CO(2) on Gas Exchange of Leaves of Bigtooth Aspen (Populus grandidentata) in the Field.

Authors:  T W Jurik; J A Weber; D M Gates
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Chlorophyll determination in intact tissues using n,n-dimethylformamide.

Authors:  R Moran; D Porath
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  EFFECT OF NONRANDOM LEAF ORIENTATION ON REPRODUCTION IN LACTUCA SERRIOLA L.

Authors:  Kenneth S Werk; James Ehleringer
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves.

Authors:  S von Caemmerer; G D Farquhar
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.116

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Photosynthetic symmetry of sun and shade leaves of different orientations.

Authors:  Evan H De Lucia; Hemanth D Shenoi; Shawna L Naidu; Thomas A Day
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Photosynthetic and structural acclimation to light direction in vertical leaves of Silphium terebinthinaceum.

Authors:  Mary E Poulson; Evan H DeLucia
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Population distributions of plant size and light environment of giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) at three densities.

Authors:  Thomas W Jurik
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Leaf orientation and light interception by juvenile Pseudopanax crassifolius(Cunn.) C. Koch in a partially shaded forest environment.

Authors:  Michael J Clearwater; Kevin S Gould
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.