Literature DB >> 28312614

The influence of snow on lynx and coyote movements: does morphology affect behavior?

Dennis L Murray1, Stan Boutin1.   

Abstract

We studied sympatric lynx (Lynx canadensis) and coyotes (Canis latrans) to assess how morphological disadvantages to locomotion over snow affected movement patterns. Both species are of similar size and mass, but the feet of lynx are much larger, and coyotes were found to have 4.1-8.8 times the foot-load (ratio of body mass to foot area) of lynx. This resulted in greater mean sinking depths of coyote limbs, although the magnitude of the difference was less than that in foot-load. Coyotes exhibited stronger use of behavioral patterns that reduced negative effects of snow on movements. Coyotes were most abundant at low elevations where snow was shallow, whereas lynx were mostly at higher elevations. Coyotes also used areas at both elevations where snow was shallower than average, while lynx used areas where snow was deeper. further, both species used travel routes where snow was shallower than it was near the track. Coyotes traveled on harder snow and used trails more frequently, thereby tending to reduce sinking depths to those similar to lynx. The behavioral repertoire of coyotes reduced the morphological advantage of large feet possessed by lynx; however, overall sinking depths were still greater in coyotes. Snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) were the main prey of both species, and their foot-load was less than that of either predator. Hare kills by coyotes occurred after fewer bounds than did those by lynx, and the large difference between foot-loads of both species of predators may have forced coyotes to ambush rather than chase hares, as did lynx.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavior; Coyote; Lynx; Morphology; Snow

Year:  1991        PMID: 28312614     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  1 in total

1.  Comparisons of canid and felid social systems from an evolutionary perspective.

Authors:  D G Kleiman; J F Eisenberg
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.844

  1 in total
  9 in total

1.  Foraging ecology of bison at the landscape and plant community levels: the applicability of energy maximization principles.

Authors:  Daniel Fortin; John M Fryxell; Lloyd O'Brodovich; Dan Frandsen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Snow conditions may create an invisible barrier for lynx.

Authors:  Nils Chr Stenseth; Amir Shabbar; Kung-Sik Chan; Stan Boutin; Eli Knispel Rueness; Dorothee Ehrich; James W Hurrell; Ole Chr Lingjaerde; Kjetill S Jakobsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Reconsidering the specialist-generalist paradigm in niche breadth dynamics: resource gradient selection by Canada lynx and bobcat.

Authors:  Michael J L Peers; Daniel H Thornton; Dennis L Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Regional differences in winter diets of bobcats in their northern range.

Authors:  Roberta K Newbury; Karen E Hodges
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  The influence of snowmobile trails on coyote movements during winter in high-elevation landscapes.

Authors:  Eric M Gese; Jennifer L B Dowd; Lise M Aubry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact of rewilding, species introductions and climate change on the structure and function of the Yukon boreal forest ecosystem.

Authors:  Rudy Boonstra; Stan Boutin; Thomas S Jung; Charles J Krebs; Shawn Taylor
Journal:  Integr Zool       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.654

7.  Fine-scale habitat selection by sympatric Canada lynx and bobcat.

Authors:  Samantha J Morin; Jeff Bowman; Robby R Marrotte; Marie-Josée Fortin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Seasonal and daily shifts in behavior and resource selection: how a carnivore navigates costly landscapes.

Authors:  E Hance Ellington; Erich M Muntz; Stanley D Gehrt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Improved Trapping and Handling of an Arboreal, Montane Mammal: Red Panda Ailurus fulgens.

Authors:  Damber Bista; Sonam Tashi Lama; Janno Weerman; Ang Phuri Sherpa; Purushotam Pandey; Madhuri Karki Thapa; Haribhadra Acharya; Nicholas J Hudson; Greg S Baxter; Peter John Murray
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.