Literature DB >> 28312517

Influence of temperature and food availability on the ecological energetics of the giant scallop Placopecten magellanicus : IV. Reproductive effort, value and cost.

B A MacDonald1, R J Thompson1, B L Bayne2.   

Abstract

Gonad output, reproductive effort and residual reproductive value are greater in scallops (Placopecten magellanicus) from shallow water, where conditions are more favourable, than in scallops from deep water. Variation between years in these fitness correlates is also greater in shallow water scallops. High reproductive effort is associated with a greater reproductive cost, although in general reproduction in this species appears to be "restrained", and only in older individuals from shallow water is there evidence of "reckless" reproductive behaviour. Reproductive effort increases as the animal grows older, but residual reproductive value is a maximum at age 4 years, after which it decreases with age owing to greater mortality. Localities vary in their suitability for scallop growth and reproduction, and at one Newfoundland site conditions in shallow water (10 m) are better than those in deep water (31 m). Scallops from the former have a greater fitness than those from the latter. The energy costs of reproduction have implications for life history variability in P. magellanicus, although for a considerable part of its lifetime the scallop is able to maximise gamete production in response to environmental factors (especially the food supply) without trading off reproduction against growth or maintenance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Placopecten magellanicus; Reproductive effort; Scallop

Year:  1987        PMID: 28312517     DOI: 10.1007/BF00378981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort.

Authors:  M F Hirshfield; D W Tinkle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas.

Authors:  S C Stearns
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 4.875

3.  Life-history evolution in Anodonta piscinalis (Mollusca, Pelecypoda) : Correlation of parameters.

Authors:  Erkki Haukioja; Tuomo Hakala
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  MEASURING THE COST OF REPRODUCTION. I. THE CORRELATION STRUCTURE OF THE LIFE TABLE OF A PLANKTON ROTIFER.

Authors:  Graham Bell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Reproductive effort of winkles (Littorina spp.) with contrasted methods of reproduction.

Authors:  Roger N Hughes; Derek J Roberts
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The relationship between food ration and reproductive effort in the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis.

Authors:  R J Thompson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Age-specific residual reproductive value and reproductive effort in the Iceland scallop, Chlamys islandica (O.F. Müller).

Authors:  Ola Vahl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Reproductive effort and value in different populations of the marine mussel, Mytilus edulis L.

Authors:  B L Bayne; P N Salkeld; C M Worrall
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  The cost of reproduction-a physiological approach.

Authors:  P Calow
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1979-02
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Spatial variability in size at maturity of golden king crab (Lithodes aequispinus) and implications for fisheries management.

Authors:  A P Olson; C E Siddon; G L Eckert
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.963

2.  Diminished growth and vitality in juvenile Hydractinia echinata under anticipated future temperature and variable nutrient conditions.

Authors:  Daniel Tschink; Gabriele Gerlach; Michael Winklhofer; Cora Kohlmeier; Bernd Blasius; Laura Eickelmann; Yvonne Schadewell; Julia Strahl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.