Literature DB >> 28312492

Mechanisms of competition among insectivorous mammals.

C R Dickman1.   

Abstract

This study investigates the mechanisms of competition between congeneric pairs of insectivorous mammals in two communities in Australia and England. Direct field observations showed that physical interactions between species do not occur, whereas conspecific encounters are frequent. In field enclosures the smaller, subordinate species in each community (Antechinus stuartii: Marsupialia: Sorex minutus: Eutheria) remained alert in the presence of the dominant species (A. swainsonii, S. araneus), and moved quickly away when the latter approached. The rate of prey capture by subordinate individuals also increased immediately after removal of the dominants. Hourly removals of some individuals of the dominant species in each community over 24 h produced hourly increases in the numbers of subordinate individuals that were captured. The rapidity of these responses suggests strongly that the dominant insectivores in each community interfered with the resource use of the subordinate species. Biomass of invertebrates increased inconsistently or slowly within 3 months of removal of the dominant insectivores; hence the rapid responses by subordinate individuals in experiments were not due to simple exploitation or tracking of resource levels. The subordinate insectivores probably detected and avoided contact with dominants instantaneously using auditory or olfactory cues; reciprocal avoidance of congeneric odours was demonstrated using odour-scented traps. Insectivorous mammals may usually compete by interference (or encounter competition, sensu Schoener 1983). For dominant species within communities the cost of interference is minimal and the benefit of gaining exclusive access to resource-rich microhabitats is high. Conversely for subordinate species the benefit of temporarily exploiting the same rich microhabitats may exceed the small costs of vigilance and movement to nearby refugia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antechinus; Competition; Insectivores; Interference; Sorex

Year:  1991        PMID: 28312492     DOI: 10.1007/BF00323757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Competition in desert rodents: an experiment with semipermeable exclosures.

Authors:  J C Munger; J H Brown
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Experimental field evidence of interspecific aggression between two species of kangaroo rat (Dipodomys).

Authors:  R J Frye
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  A test of a competition model with reference to three species of small mammals in south-eastern Australia.

Authors:  C R Dickman; D P Woodside
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An experimental manipulation of the intensity of interspecific competition: effects on a small marsupial.

Authors:  C R Dickman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  A removal experiment with sympatric populations of Apodemus sylvaticus (L.) and A. flavicollis (Melchior) (Rodentia: Muridae).

Authors:  W I Montgomery
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Interference competition and niche theory.

Authors:  T J Case; M E Gilpin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Competition and species diversity.

Authors:  R S Miller
Journal:  Brookhaven Symp Biol       Date:  1969

8.  On co-existence, foraging strategy and the biogeography of weasels and stoats (Mustela nivalis and M. erminea) in Britain.

Authors:  C M King; P J Moors
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.225

  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Implications of climatic seasonality on activity patterns and resource use by sympatric peccaries in northern Pantanal.

Authors:  Gabriel Selbach Hofmann; Igor Pfeifer Coelho; Vinicius Augusto Galvão Bastazini; José Luís Passos Cordeiro; Luiz Flamarion Barbosa de Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Interference competition and temporal niche shifts: elephants and herbivore communities at waterholes.

Authors:  Marion Valeix; Simon Chamaillé-Jammes; Hervé Fritz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Can remote infrared cameras be used to differentiate small, sympatric mammal species? A case study of the black-tailed dusky antechinus, Antechinus arktos and co-occurring small mammals in southeast Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Emma L Gray; Todd E Dennis; Andrew M Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Determining the efficacy of camera traps, live capture traps, and detection dogs for locating cryptic small mammal species.

Authors:  Morgan L Thomas; Lynn Baker; James R Beattie; Andrew M Baker
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  Venom Use in Eulipotyphlans: An Evolutionary and Ecological Approach.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kowalski; Leszek Rychlik
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Patterns of detection and capture are associated with cohabiting predators and prey.

Authors:  Billie T Lazenby; Christopher R Dickman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.