Literature DB >> 28312414

Augmentation of beneficial arthropods by strip-management : 1. Succession of predacious arthropods and long-term change in the ratio of phytophagous and predacious arthropods in a meadow.

Wolfgang Nentwig1.   

Abstract

A 5-year-field experiment was performed in a meadow to test the effect of strip-management (small unmown strips alternating with broad mown strips, Fig. 1) on the abundance and composition of arthropods. The species number and density of most predator groups increased from year to year. The succession (parallel to the development of the unmown strips) favoured more specialized species, so that the initial pioneer species become less abundant in consecutive years. In spiders, this succession leads from a dominance of Linyphiidae to a dominance of Lycosidae; the spider biomass increases and probably predator pressure by spiders is augmented. The stability of the predator community (measured as the variance of their frequency in successive years) is higher than that of the phytophagous groups. Under strip-managed conditions the abundance ("activity density") of most arthropod groups decreases by an average of ca. 12%. The trophic levels, however, are affected to different extents and strong species-specific preferences were found as well. These combined effects lead to constant increase in the ratio of predacious and parasitic to phytophagous insects in the strip-managed area and probably lead also to an increase of the predator pressure facing phytophagous insects. Strip-management is discussed as an important technique among integrated methods for the biological control of pests.

Keywords:  Augmentation; Integrated control; Pest species; Predators; Succession

Year:  1988        PMID: 28312414     DOI: 10.1007/BF00397876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Prey analysis of four species of tropical orb-weaving spiders (Araneae: Araneidae) and a comparison with araneids of the temperate zone.

Authors:  Wolfgang Nentwig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The prey of web-building spiders compared with feeding experiments (Araneae: Araneidae, Linyphiidae, pholcidae, Agelenidae).

Authors:  Wolfgang Nentwig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Non-webbuilding spiders: prey specialists or generalists?

Authors:  Wolfgang Nentwig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Epigeic spiders, their potential prey and competitors: Relationship between size and frequency.

Authors:  Wolfgang Nentwig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Correlations between dry weight of spiders and their length and fresh weight.

Authors:  A Breymeyer
Journal:  Bull Acad Pol Sci Biol       Date:  1967
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.