Literature DB >> 28312321

Friends and strangers: a test of the Charnov-Finerty Hypothesis.

Rudy Boonstra1, Ian Hogg1.   

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that populations composed of unrelated animals should perform worse than those composed of related animals by setting up two moderatedly dense field populations in adjacent enclosures: one was composed of related females and one of unrelated females; both had unrelated males. The survival and reproductive success of a number of litters located by spooling were determined. Final population size, pregnancy success, number of young recruited per pregnancy, and survival were similar in both populations. Thus, differences in relatedness produced no differences in demography. We conclude that the Charnov-Finerty Hypothesis in unlikely to be an explanation for microtine population fluctuations.

Keywords:  Charnov-Finerty Hypothesis; Dispersal; Kin selection; Population cycles; Voles

Year:  1988        PMID: 28312321     DOI: 10.1007/BF00380931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Influence of numbers on reproduction and survival in two experimental vole populations.

Authors:  J R CLARKE
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1955-08-16

2.  Myiasis by Wohlfahrtia vigil in nestling Microtus pennsylvanicus.

Authors:  I T Craine; R Boonstra
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.535

3.  Dispersal and the microtine cycle: comparison of two hypotheses.

Authors:  Helena Warkowska-Dratnal; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The effect of kinship on spacing among female red-backed voles, Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae.

Authors:  M Kawata
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Vole population cycles: Kin-selection or familiarity?

Authors:  Marc Bekoff
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Vole population cycles: A case for kin-selection?

Authors:  E L Charnov; J P Finerty
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  A TEST OF THE CHITTY HYPOTHESIS: INHERITANCE OF LIFE-HISTORY TRAITS IN MEADOW VOLES MICROTUS PENNSYLVANICUS.

Authors:  Rudy Boonstra; Peter T Boag
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.694

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Different demography of friends and strangers: an experiment on the impact of kinship and familiarity in Clethrionomys glareolus.

Authors:  H Ylönen; T Mappes; J Viitala
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Gone girl: Richardson's ground squirrel offspring and neighbours are resilient to female removal.

Authors:  Angela R Freeman; Thomas J Wood; Kevin R Bairos-Novak; W Gary Anderson; James F Hare
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.963

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.