Literature DB >> 28312284

Effects of habitat and season on competitive interactions between roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis).

L Persson1.   

Abstract

The competitive interactions between two distantly related fish species, roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis), were studied in enclosures in two habitats. In the open water habitat dominated by small planktonic prey perch grew more slowly and altered its diet from zooplankton to benthic macroinvertebrates when in the presence of roach. No effect, however, of perch on roach was observed. This was probably caused by the higher foraging efficiency of roach on zooplankton (laboratory experiments) and to the presence of a resource utilizable only by roach, bluegreen algae/detritus. In the littoral habitat no interspecific effects were detected even though resources were more limiting. This was probably a consequence of the higher densities of chironomids, on which perch fed more efficiently than roach, and of the presence of bluegreen algae/detritus. Roach, which consumed a larger spectrum of food types than perch, as a result was less affected by competition. The distributions of the species in the lake corresponded to what could be predicted from experiments. The degree of resource limitation varied with season and was highest in summer, while no resource limitation was observed in spring. This variation in resource limitation is probably caused by the increased metabolic demands of the fish in summer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competition; Fish; Habitat; Season; Temperature

Year:  1987        PMID: 28312284     DOI: 10.1007/BF00377504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  Resource partitioning and interspecific competition in two two-species insular anolis lizard communities.

Authors:  S Pacala; J Roughgarden
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-07-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Competition between freshwater fish and goldeneyes Bucephala clangula (L.) for common prey.

Authors:  Mats O G Eriksson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Seasonally fluctuating resources and temporal variability of interspecific competition.

Authors:  Russell J Schmitt; Sally J Holbrook
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Do goldeneye and perch compete for food?

Authors:  John McAllister Eadie; Allen Keast
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability.

Authors:  R M May; R H MacArthur
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Resource partitioning among competing species--a coevolutionary approach.

Authors:  J Roughgarden
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.570

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Feeding of an Iberian stream cyprinid assemblage: seasonality of resource use in a highly variable environment.

Authors:  M F Magalhães
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Coexistence of fish species in a large lowland river: food niche partitioning between small-sized percids, cyprinids and sticklebacks in submersed macrophytes.

Authors:  Małgorzata Dukowska; Maria Grzybkowska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Bridge under troubled water: Turbulence and niche partitioning in fish foraging.

Authors:  Zeynep Pekcan-Hekim; Noora Hellén; Laura Härkönen; Per Anders Nilsson; Leena Nurminen; Jukka Horppila
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Warmer and browner waters decrease fish biomass production.

Authors:  Renee M van Dorst; Anna Gårdmark; Richard Svanbäck; Ulrika Beier; Gesa A Weyhenmeyer; Magnus Huss
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Water transparency drives intra-population divergence in Eurasian Perch (Perca fluviatilis).

Authors:  Pia Bartels; Philipp E Hirsch; Richard Svanbäck; Peter Eklöv
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Preference for cannibalism and ontogenetic constraints in competitive ability of piscivorous top predators.

Authors:  Pär Byström; Per Ask; Jens Andersson; Lennart Persson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.