Literature DB >> 28312281

Resource use, energetic profitability, and behavioral decisions in migrant rufous hummingbirds.

Dennis Heinemann1.   

Abstract

Migrant Rufous Hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus) defend nectar resources at stopover sites while replenishing fat reserves needed for migratory flights. During late summer in the Sandia Mountains, central New Mexico, they defend the wasp- and bee-pollinated Scrophularia montana from other hummingbirds. Both hummingbirds and hymenopterans exploit Scrophularia nectar during the early part of its flowering period. As summer colony growth increases the densities of the eusocial hymenopterans by 100-150%, their exploitation of Scrophularia nectar lowers its mean standing crop in flowers by 200-300%. Sometime during the summer, Rufous Hummingbirds abandon and do not further use this resource for the remaining 3-4 weeks of its flowering period. The abandonment always occurs when the mean standing crop of nectar is approximately 0.2-0.3 μL/ flower. This paper describes a model of Rufous Hummingbird energetics, that shows abandonment occurred 1-3 days after they passed the threshold at which the resource could have provided their minimum daily energy requirements. I suggest that constraints imposed by a highly competitive social environment severely reduced the options available to the hummingbirds, and caused them to continue to defend a resource that could no longer meet their energetic requirements.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nectarivores; Patch choice; Selasphorus rufus; Territoriality; Territory/foraging energetics

Year:  1992        PMID: 28312281     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  15 in total

1.  Threshold model of feeding territoriality and test with a hawaiian honeycreeper.

Authors:  F L Carpenter; R E Macmillen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Time, Energy, and Territoriality of the Anna Hummingbird (Calypte anna).

Authors:  F G Stiles
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-08-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Torpor in an andean hummingbird: its ecological significance.

Authors:  F L Carpenter
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Energy limitation of hummingbird populations in tropical and temperate communities.

Authors:  Robert D Montgomerie; C L Gass
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Energetic cost of feeding territories in an Hawaiian honeycreeper.

Authors:  F Lynn Carpenter; Richard E MacMillen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Territorial responses to energy manipulations in the Anna hummingbird.

Authors:  Paul W Ewald; F Lynn Carpenter
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Environmental influence of regulated body temperature in torpid hummingbirds.

Authors:  L L Wolf; F R Hainsworth
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1972-01-01

8.  Energetic efficiency and metabolic transformations.

Authors:  L P Milligan
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1971 Jul-Aug

9.  Hypothermia of Broad-Tailed Hummingbirds during Incubation in Nature with Ecological Correlations.

Authors:  W A Calder; J Booser
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-05-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Digestive physiology is a determinant of foraging bout frequency in hummingbirds.

Authors:  J M Diamond; W H Karasov; D Phan; F L Carpenter
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Mar 6-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.