Literature DB >> 28312266

Cost of reproduction as reduced growth in genotypes of two congeneric species with contrasting life histories.

E G Reekie1, F A Bazzaz2.   

Abstract

We examined the effect of reproduction on growth in 33 genotypes of Plantago major and 14 genotypes of P. rugelii. These two herbaceous perennials have contrasting life histories; P. major reproduces at a smaller size, and allocates a larger proportion of its biomass to reproduction, than P. rugelii. The effect of reproduction on frowth was determined experimentally using photoperiod manipulations to control level of reproduction. The difference in growth between reproductive treatments was divided by the difference in capsule weight to produce a measure of reproductive cost per g of capsule for genotypes of the two species. In both species there was substantial variation among genotypes in the effect of reproduction on growth. Much of this variation could be correlated with differences among genotypes in the extent of reproductive investment and plant size. Cost in terms of reduction in growth per g of capsule increased with reproductive investment in P. rugelii, and with plant size in P. major. We suggest the differences between species in timing and extent of reproduction are related to the differences between species in effect of reproduction on growth. Plantago rugelii may reproduce to a lesser extent than P. major because cost per g of capsule in terms of reduced vegetative biomass, increases with reproductive output in the former species, but not in the latter. Similarly, P. major may reproduce earlier than P. rugelii because cost per g of capsule increases with plant size in P. major, but not in P. rugelii.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Photoperiod; Reproductive effort; Reproductive output; Size at reproduction; Time of reproduction

Year:  1992        PMID: 28312266     DOI: 10.1007/BF00317804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

1.  Predictions of fate from rosette size in teasel (Dipsacus fullonum L.).

Authors:  Patricia A Werner
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Photosynthesis by flowers in Encelia farinosa and Encelia californica (Asteraceae).

Authors:  Kenneth S Werk; James R Ehleringer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGICAL GENETICS IN PLANTAGO. VII. REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT IN POPULATIONS OF P. LANCEOLATA L.

Authors:  Richard B Primack; Janis Antonovics
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Differential costs of sexual and vegetative reproduction in wild strawberry populations.

Authors:  Thomas W Jurik
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Predictions of fate from rosette size in four "biennial" plant species: Verbascum thapsus, Oenothera biennis, Daucus carota, and Tragopogon dubius.

Authors:  Katherine L Gross
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Accessory costs of seed production.

Authors:  Janice M Lord; Mark Westoby
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Timing of seed germination and the reproductive effort in Xanthium canadense.

Authors:  Y Shitaka; T Hirose
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Reproductive trade-offs in genetically distinct clones ofVaccinium macrocarpon, the American cranberry.

Authors:  Elizabeth Elle
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Phenotypic and genetic differences in a perennial herb across a natural gradient of CO2 concentration.

Authors:  Ito Nakamura; Yusuke Onoda; Noe Matsushima; Jun Yokoyama; Masakado Kawata; Kouki Hikosaka
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Inter- and intra-generic differences in growth, reproduction, and fitness of nine herbaceous annual species grown in elevated CO2 environments.

Authors:  E J Farnsworth; F A Bazzaz
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.225

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.